Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:44:05.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting subjective memory complaints in the AIBL aging study: biomarkers, memory, affect, and age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2013

R. Buckley*
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
M. M. Saling
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
D. Ames
Affiliation:
National Aging Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St. Vincent's Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
C. C. Rowe
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
N. T. Lautenschlager
Affiliation:
Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St. Vincent's Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences and Western Australian Centre for Health and Aging, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
S. L. Macaulay
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization Preventative Health Flagship, Parkville, Australia
R. N. Martins
Affiliation:
School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
C. L. Masters
Affiliation:
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
T. O'Meara
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization Preventative Health Flagship, Parkville, Australia
G. Savage
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
C. Szoeke
Affiliation:
National Aging Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
V. L. Villemagne
Affiliation:
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
K. A. Ellis
Affiliation:
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St. Vincent's Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Rachel Buckley, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. Phone: +61-3-8344-4297. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Background:

The prognostic value of subjective memory complaints (SMCs) in the diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type is unclear. While some studies have found an association between SMCs and cognitive decline, many have found a stronger association with depression, which raises questions about their diagnostic utility.

Methods:

We examined the cross-sectional association between SMC severity (as measured using the MAC-Q, a brief SMC questionnaire) and affect, memory, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers (β-amyloid deposition and the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOEε4) allele) in healthy elderly controls (HC; M = 78.74 years, SD = 6.7) and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; M = 72.74 years, SD = 8.8). We analyzed a subset of individuals drawn from the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study of Aging.

Results:

SMCs were more severe in MCI patients than in HCs. SMC severity was related to affective variables and the interaction between age and group membership (HC/MCI). Within the HC group, SMC severity was related to affective variables only, while severity correlated only with age in the MCI group. SMCs were not related to cognitive variables or AD biomarkers.

Conclusion:

SMCs were related to solely by poorer mood (greater depressive and anxious symptomatology) in the cognitively healthy elderly however mean levels were subclinical. This finding argues for the assessment of affective symptomatology in conjunction with cognitive assessment in elderly memory complainers. Future AIBL research will focus on assessing other AD biomarkers, such as brain atrophy and Aβ plasma markers, in relation to complaint severity. Once our 36-month follow-up data are collected, we propose to assess whether SMCs can predict future cognitive decline.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulrab, K. and Heun, R. (2008). Subjective memory impairment. A review of its definitions indicates the need for a comprehensive set of standardised and validated criteria. European Psychiatry, 23, 321330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braak, H. and Braak, E. (1991). Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica, 82, 239259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chételat, G.et al. (2010). Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease. Annals of Neurology, 67, 317324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarnette, R. M., Almeida, O. P., Förstl, H., Paton, A. and Martins, R. N. (2001). Clinical characteristics of individuals with subjective memory loss in Western Australia: results from a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 168174.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, T., Feher, E. and Larrabee, G. (1992). Assessment of memory complaint in age-associated memory impairment: the MAC-Q. International Psychogeriatrics, 4, 165176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E. and Ober, B. (2000). CVLT-II, California Verbal Learning Test, Adult Version, Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Elfgren, C., Gustafson, L., Vestberg, S. and Passant, U. (2010). Subjective memory complaints, neuropsychological performance and psychiatric variables in memory clinic attendees: a 3-year follow-up study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, e110e114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, K.et al. (2009). The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 672687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, S.et al. (2006). Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet, 367, 12621270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginó, S.et al. (2010). Memory complaints are frequent but qualitatively different in young and elderly healthy people. Gerontology, 56, 272277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glodzik-Sobanska, L.et al. (2007). Subjective memory complaints: presence, severity and future outcome in normal older subjects. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24, 177184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenop, K. R.et al. (2011). Awareness of cognitive deficits in older adults with cognitive-impairment-no-dementia (CIND): comparison with informant report. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 25, 2433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, C. R.et al. (2010). Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. The Lancet Neurology, 9, 119128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonker, C., Geerlings, M. I. and Schmand, B. (2000). Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 983991.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lautenschlager, N. T., Flicker, L., Vasikaran, S., Leedman, P. and Almeida, O. P. (2005). Subjective memory complaints with and without objective memory impairment: relationship with risk factors for dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 731734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyers, J. and Meyers, K. (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 183194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G. and Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56, 303308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plotkin, D., Mintz, J. and Jarvik, L. (1985). Subjective memory complaints in geriatric depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 11031105.Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, M.et al. (2011). Memory complaint questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 199205, doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B. and Gauthier, S. (2008). Current evidence for subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) as the pre-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of subsequently manifest Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. L., Clare, L. and Woods, R. T. (2009). Subjective memory complaints and awareness of memory functioning in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 28, 95109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, C. C.et al. (2010). Amyloid imaging results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 31, 12751283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snaith, R. and Zigmond, A. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361370.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1945). Wechsler Memory Scale®–Third edition(WMS–III). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Winblad, B.et al. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yesavage, J.et al. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Buckley Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Buckley Supplementary Material(File)
File 62.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Buckley Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Buckley Supplementary Material(File)
File 62.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Buckley Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Buckley Supplementary Material(File)
File 64.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Buckley Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Buckley Supplementary Material(File)
File 57.1 KB