Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T12:36:11.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of age, working memory, and word order on passive-sentence comprehension: evidence from a verb-final language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2017

Jee Eun Sung ,
Jae Keun Yoo ,
Soo Eun Lee  and
Bora Eom
Jee Eun Sung*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
Jae Keun Yoo
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
Soo Eun Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
Bora Eom
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jee Eun Sung, PhD., Associate Professor, Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Education Building A-306, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, South Korea. Phone: +82 10 3286 7243; Fax: +82 2 3277 2123. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background:

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of working-memory (WM) capacity on age-related changes in abilities to comprehend passive sentences when the word order was systematically manipulated.

Methods:

A total of 134 individuals participated in the study. The sentence-comprehension task consisted of the canonical and non-canonical word-order conditions. A composite measure of WM scores was used as an index of WM capacity.

Results:

Participants exhibited worse performance on sentences with non-canonical word order than canonical word order. The two-way interaction between age and WM was significant, suggesting that WM effects were greater than age effects on the task.

Conclusions:

WM capacity effects on passive-sentence comprehension increased dramatically as people aged, suggesting that those who have larger WM capacity are less vulnerable to age-related changes in sentence-comprehension abilities. WM capacity may serve as a cognitive reserve associated with sentence-comprehension abilities for elderly adults.

Keywords

working-memory capacityagingsentence comprehensioncanonicity of word order
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 939 - 948
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (ed.), Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, D., DeDe, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J. and Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging, 26, 439–450. doi:10.1037/a0021837.Google Scholar
Caplan, D. and Waters, G. (2003). On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: studies with auditory moving window presentation. Brain and Language, 84, 222–249. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00514-X.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A. and Just, M. A. (1995). Language comprehension: sentence and discourse processing. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 46, 91–120. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.000515.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A. and Ball, H. E. (1989). Effects of age on comprehension of complex sentences in adulthood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 143–150. doi:10.1044/jshr.3201.143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeDe, G., Caplan, D., Kemtes, K. and Waters, G. S. (2004). The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 19, 601–616. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrell, F. (2015). Problems caused by categorizing continuous variables/References/Editable references/Key reference/Key reference for response variables. Available at: http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/CatContinuous; last accessed 7 July 2015.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Y. (2006). A normative study of the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in the Elderly. Korean Journal of Psychology, 25, 1–12. doi:10.14385/KSSP.25.2.1.Google Scholar
Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–287. doi:10.1017/S0142716400007578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. and Kemtes, K. (1999). Limitations on syntactic processing. In Kemper, S. and Kliegl, R. (eds.), Constraints on Language: Aging, Grammar, and Memory (pp. 79–105). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kemtes, K. and Kemper, S. (1997). Younger and older adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentence. Psychology and Aging, 12, 362–371. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.12.2.362.Google Scholar
Light, L. (1990). Interactions between memory and language in old age. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 275–290). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Morris, R. G., Gick, M. L. and Craik, F. I. M. (1988). Processing resources and age differences in working memory. Memory and Cognition, 16, 362–366. doi:10.3758/BF03197047.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K., Fein, D., Nicholas, M. and Albert, M. L. (1991). Auditory comprehension and aging: decline in syntactic processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 433–452. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005865.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K., Nicholas, M., Albert, M. L. and Woodward, S. (1985). On comprehension across the adult lifespan. Cortex, 21, 273–280. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(85)80032-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochon, E., Waters, G. S. and Caplan, D. (1994). Sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer′s disease. Brain and Language, 46, 329–349. doi:10.1006/brln.1994.1018.Google Scholar
Rochon, E., Waters, G. S. and Caplan, D. (2000). The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 395–413. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4302.395.Google Scholar
Sohn, H.-M. (1999). The Korean Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 448–460. doi:10.1017/S1355617702813248.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2015–2028. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. (2012). Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. The Lancet Neurology, 11, 1006–1012. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Ryan, S. and Leonard, J. S. (2000). Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 315–322. doi:10.1080/036107300750015714.Google Scholar
Sung, J. E. (2011). The reliability and validity of short-term and working memory pointing tasks developed for clinical populations with speech and language disorders. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 16, 185–201.Google Scholar
Sung, J. E. (2015a). Effects of syntactic structure on sentence comprehension abilities as a function of the canonicity of word-order and their relation to working memory capacity in Korean-speaking elderly adults. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 20, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, J. E. (2015b). Age-related changes in sentence production abilities and their relation to working-memory capacity: evidence from a verb-final language. PLoS One 10, e0119424. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0119424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, J. E. (2016). Age-related decline in case-marker processing and its relation to working memory capacity. The Journal of Gerontology: Series B. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv117, First published online: January 16, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S. and Caplan, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16, 128–144. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, G. S. and Caplan, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550–564. doi:10.3758/BF03195534.Google Scholar
Waters, G. S. and Caplan, D. (2005). The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension. Memory, 13, 403–413. doi:10.1080/09658210344000459.Google ScholarPubMed
Waters, G. S., Caplan, D. and Rochon, E. (1995). Processing capacity and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 1–30. doi:10.1080/02643299508251990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., Rochon, E. and Caplan, D. (1998). Task demands and sentence comprehension in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Brain and Language, 62, 361–397. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1880.Google Scholar
Yeom, T. H., Park, Y. S., Oh, K. J., Kim, J. K. and Lee, Y. H. (1992). A Manual for K–WAIS. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Guidance.Google Scholar
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Wingfield, A. and Brownell, H. (1995). The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: evidence from the elderly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 165–182. doi:10.1007/BF02145354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed