Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:24:36.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential item functioning related to education and age in the Italian version of the Mini-mental State Examination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2006

Paul K. Crane ,
Laura E. Gibbons ,
Lance Jolley ,
Gerald van Belle ,
Ricardo Selleri ,
Edoardo Dalmonte  and
Diana De Ronchi
Paul K. Crane
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
Laura E. Gibbons
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
Lance Jolley
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Gerald van Belle
Affiliation:
Departments of Biostatistics and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
Ricardo Selleri
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Edoardo Dalmonte
Affiliation:
Unit of Geriatric Medicine, Local Health Authority of Ravenna, Faenza, Italy
Diana De Ronchi
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Background: Differential item functioning (DIF) exists when test item responses by members of different demographic groups are statistically different when controlling for ability. DIF may indicate item bias. Our objective was to determine whether items from the Italian Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) had DIF related to educational attainment, age, gender and occupation. We were also interested in exploring the significance of DIF in screening tests.

Methods: In a two-stage study from Granarolo, Italy, residents over age 61 (n = 495) were evaluated with the Italian MMSE. Those with MMSE scores of 28 or lower were further evaluated for dementia. MMSE results were coded in 10 item bundles. We used ordinal logistic regression to determine whether item bundles had DIF.

Results: Six of the 10 MMSE item bundles had DIF in educational attainment subgroups. Four of these six bundles also had DIF related to age. Items that required literacy were much harder for those with lower educational attainment.

Conclusions: DIF related to education appeared at as few as 3 years of formal schooling. These findings suggest cautious interpretation of data from studies using the Italian MMSE in populations with heterogeneous educational backgrounds. DIF is especially troublesome for two-stage studies that use screening tests.

Keywords

test biasscreening testsdementiacognitive functioningordinal logistic regressiontwo-stage sampling design (epidemiology)
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 505 - 515
Copyright
International Psychogeriatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)