Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:23:15.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential cognitive impairment in subjects with geriatric depression who will develop Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a retrospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2005

Léonie Jean
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval, Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert-Giffard, Québec City, Canada
Martine Simard
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval, Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert-Giffard, Québec City, Canada École de psychologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, Canada
Robert van Reekum
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, and Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Diana E. Clarke
Affiliation:
Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences and the Collaborative Program in Aging and the Life Course, University of Toronto, and Department of Psychiatry, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively differentiate the cognitive profile of subjects with geriatric depression who will later be diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) from those who will be diagnosed with other dementias, and subjects who will remain with no dementia.

Methods: Forty-four depressed patients admitted to a day hospital program for depression who participated in a historical cohort study were assessed after 7.5 years of follow-up. Fourteen of these subjects subsequently developed dementia: seven met the criteria for probable AD and seven met the criteria for dementias other than AD (Dementia-No-AD; D-NAD, such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), vascular and mixed dementia). Thirty subjects remained without dementia (No Dementia, ND) at follow-up. The three groups were thus compared on their baseline cognitive performances on the six sections of the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and on the five subscales of the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS).

Results: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Student–Newman–Keuls analyses with an alpha of p<0.05 revealed that the subjects who received a diagnosis of dementia at follow-up had previously had more impairment on tasks measuring attention and memory (DRS-MMSE) than those who did not develop dementia (AD=D-NAD<ND). Moreover, the future AD subjects could be differentiated on the basis of their difficulties on the MMSE-orientation subtest (AD<ND=D-NAD), whereas the future D-NAD subjects initially had more problems with executive functions (DRS) and MMSE-visuospatial abilities (D-NAD<AD=ND).

Conclusion: The identification of early neuropsychological markers in elderly depressed patients highlights the need to evaluate this population broadly as soon as possible in the depression/dementia process in order to improve the prognosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)