Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T07:53:16.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Delphi study of late-onset personality disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2019

Erlene Rosowsky ,
Emily Lodish ,
James M. Ellison  and
S. P. J. van Alphen
Erlene Rosowsky*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Alliance for Aging, William James College, Newton, MA, USA
Emily Lodish
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychology Department, William James College, Newton, MA, USA
James M. Ellison
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA The Swank Foundation Endowed Chair in Memory Care and Geriatrics, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA
S. P. J. van Alphen
Affiliation:
Clinical Geropsychology, Department of Clinical & Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium Clinical Center of Excellence for Personality Disorders in Older Adults, Mondriaan Hospital, Heerlen-Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Erlene Rosowsky, Alliance for Aging, William James College, 1 Wells Avenue, Newton, MA 02459, USA. Phone: Office: 617- 327-6777; Cell: 781-254-8381; Fax: 617-327-4447. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Objectives:

The DSM-5 describes personality disorders (PDs) as emerging in early life and remaining continuous throughout the life-span. Yet case studies and expert opinion support the existence of late-onset PDs. Little is known about PDs in late life, and our instruments for assessing them are not well validated. Thus, the focus of this exploratory Delphi study was the late-onset PD, with special attention to the accuracy of the core criteria for the diagnosis.

Design:

A Delphi study was designed to assess the presentation of PDs in late life. The Delphi consisted of three successive rounds of inquiry. Between rounds, the participants were provided with a summary of the panel’s responses.

Participants:

A panel of 21 experts included published authors, researchers, and teachers from the USA, the UK, Australia, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

Measurements:

Researchers designed a survey that included an introduction, a demographic questionnaire, and five questions that varied in presentation and response format.

Results:

Experts reached consensus that a variant of PD appears de novo in old age. The core features of inflexibility and pervasiveness may not pertain to late-onset PD. There was agreement that frequently occurring life events contribute selectively to the expression of late-onset PD, with the major ones being death of a spouse or partner and transition to a nursing or assisted-living facility.

Conclusions:

Nearly all participants took the position that PD can present for the first time in old age and be clinically identifiable without having been so identified earlier in life.

Keywords

late-onset personality disorderspersonality disorders in older adults
Type
Original Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 31 , Issue 7: Issue Theme: Diverse Approaches to Stemming Cognitive Decline , July 2019 , pp. 1007 - 1013
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agronin, M. E. and Maletta, G. (2000). Personality disorders in late life: understanding and overcoming the gap in research. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 4–18. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200002000-00002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Balsis, S., Woods, C. M., Gleason, M. J. and Oltmanns, T. F. (2007). Overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of personality disorders in older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 742–753. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31813c6b4e.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, I. R. et al. (2014). Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunderson, J. G. et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 300–315. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, C. and Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, M. F. (1999). Stability and change in personality disorder features: the longitudinal study of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1009–1015. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.11.1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35, 1–4.Google Scholar
Rosowsky, E. (1999). The patient-therapist relationship and the psychotherapy of the older adult with personality disorder. In: , E. Rosowsky, , , R. C. Abrams, and , R. Zweig, (Eds.), Personality Disorders in Older Adults: Emerging Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment (pp. 153–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.Google Scholar
Rossi, G., Van den Broeck, J., Dierckx, E., Segal, D. L. and van Alphen, S. P. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging & Mental Health, 18, 936–940. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.924089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L. and Rosowsky, E. (2006). Personality Disorders and Older Adults: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Tackett, J. L., Balsis, S., Oltmanns, T. F. and Krueger, R. F. (2009). A unifying perspective on personality pathology across the life span: developmental considerations for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 687–713. doi: 10.1017/S095457940900039X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Alphen, S. J., Derksen, J. J. L., Sadavoy, J. and Rosowsky, E. (2012a). Features and challenges of personality disorders in late life. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 805–810. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.667781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Alphen, S. J. et al. (2012b). Age-related aspects and clinical implications of diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders in older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 35, 27–41. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2011.628368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B. and Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among borderline patients and Axis II comparison subjects: a 16-year prospective follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 476–483. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11101550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed