Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:57:13.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication in healthcare interactions in dementia: a systematic review of observational studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Jemima Dooley Open the ORCID record for Jemima Dooley [Opens in a new window] ,
Cate Bailey  and
Rose McCabe
Jemima Dooley*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK
Cate Bailey
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Rose McCabe
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jemima Dooley, Room 1.07, College House, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX12LU, UK. Phone: 07793007148. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Communication is affected by dementia, even in the early stages. Studies directly observing how patients, companions and healthcare professionals communicate have not yet been reviewed.

Methods:

Eight databases were searched, and hand searches of relevant journals and grey literature were performed up to August 2014. Two authors reviewed abstracts independently and collectively reviewed for agreement of inclusion. Findings were narratively synthesized.

Results:

23 studies were identified observing: diagnostic, follow up, day center, primary care and research consent interactions. Companions were present in 14 studies. Three themes emerged: emotional impact of diagnosis, level of patient involvement and participant strategies to save face and cope with cognitive impairment. Eight studies observed diagnostic disclosure describing emotional reactions, with professionals using mitigating language and rarely checking patient understanding. Studies reported varying patient involvement, showing marginalization in primary care but not in assessments or diagnostic feedback. Patients used humor and metaphor to compensate for difficulties retrieving information and responding appropriately, suggesting preserved awareness of the pragmatics of interaction. Companion roles fluctuated between patient advocate and professional informant. Professionals encountered challenges adapting to heterogeneous patient groups with varying capabilities and needs.

Conclusions:

Patient-companion-professional communication in dementia care raises various ethical questions: how to strike a balance between different communicative needs of patients and companions; clarity versus sensitivity in delivery of the diagnosis; and whether to minimize or expose interactional difficulties and misunderstanding to enrich patient understanding and involvement. Healthcare professionals need guidance in delivering a diagnosis and strategies to optimize patient and companion participation.

Keywords

dementiaAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive impairmentcommunicationinteractionpatient involvementdiagnosisface work
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 27 , Issue 8 , August 2015 , pp. 1277 - 1300
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abley, C.et al. (2013). Patients’ and carers’ views on communication and information provision when undergoing assessments in memory services. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, T. and Gardiner, P. (2005). Communication and interaction within dementia care triads: developing a theory for relationship-centred care. Dementia, 4, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aminzadeh, F., Byszewski, A., Molnar, F. J. and Eisner, M. (2007). Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers’ perspectives. Aging & Mental Health, 11, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, M., Marczinski, C. A., Davis-Faroque, N. and Kertesz, A. (2007). A longitudinal study of language decline in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohling, H. R. (1991). Communication with Alzheimer's patients: an analysis of caregiver listening patterns. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourgeois, M. S. and Mason, L. A. (1996). Memory wallet intervention in an adult day-care setting. Behavioral Interventions, 11, 3–18.Google Scholar
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2002). 10 questions developed by the National CASP Collaboration for Qualitative Methodologies. In Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust (ed.). Oxford: Public Health Resource Unit.Google Scholar
Dixon-Woods, M.et al. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 12, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggenberger, E., Heimerl, K. and Bennett, M. I. (2012). Communication skills training in dementia care: a systematic review of effectiveness, training content, and didactic methods in different care settings. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour (pp. 5–46). Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Hannes, K. (2011). Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In Noyes, J., et al. (eds.) Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group.Google Scholar
Hasselkus, B. R. (1992a). The family caregiver as interpreter in the geriatric medical interview. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 6, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselkus, B. R. (1992b). Physician and family caregiver in the medical setting: negotiation of care. Journal of Ageing Studies, 6, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselkus, B. R. (1994). Three track care: older patient, family member and physician in the medical visit. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedman, R., Hansebo, G., Ternestedt, B. M., Hellstrom, I. and Norberg, A. (2014a). Expressed sense of self by people with Alzheimer's disease in a support group interpreted in terms of agency and communion. Journal of Applied Gerontology. Epublished ahead of print, doi: 10.1177/0733464814530804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedman, R., Hellstrom, I., Ternestedt, B. M., Hansebo, G. and Norberg, A. (2014b). Social positioning by people with Alzheimer's disease in a support group. Journal of Aging Studies, 28, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunsaker, A. E., Schmidt, K. and Lingler, J. H. (2010). Discussing dementia-related behaviors during medical visits for people with Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 25, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, S. A., Leger-Krall, S. and Wilson, H. S. (1997). Early probable Alzheimer's disease and awareness context theory. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1399–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnieli-Miller, O., Werner, P., Aharon-Peretz, J. and Eidelman, S. (2007). Dilemmas in the (un)veiling of the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: walking an ethical and professional tight rope. Patient Education and Counseling, 67, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnieli-Miller, O., Werner, P., Neufeld-Kroszynski, G. and Eidelman, S. (2012). Are you talking to me?! An exploration of the triadic physician-patient-companion communication within memory clinic encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 88, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, J., Woods, B., Hahn, S. and Hill, J. (2004). Community mental health nursing and early intervention in dementia: developing practice through a single case history. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, J. M., Kraft-Todd, G., Scahpira, L., Kossowsky, J. and Riess, H. (2014). The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One, 9, e101191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. (1994). “Elderspeak”: speech accommodations to older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinmonth, A. L., Woodcock, A., Griffin, S., Spiegal, N. and Campbell, M. J. (1998). Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ, 317, 1202–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindholm, C. (2008). Laughter, communication problems and dementia. Communication & Medicine, 5, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindholm, C. (2013). Challenges and opportunities of group conversations: the day care center as a communication milieu. In Guendouzi, J. and Davis, B. H. (eds.), Pragmatics in Dementia Discourse (pp. 205–238). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindholm, C. and Wray, A. (2011). Proverbs and formulaic sequences in the language of elderly people with dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 10, 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, E., Clare, L. and Pistrang, N. (2005). Processes and experiences of mutual support in professionally-led support groups for people with early-stage dementia. Dementia, 4, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, Good news: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, R., Heath, C., Burns, T. and Priebe, S. (2002). Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: conversation analytic study. BMJ, 325, 1148–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinner, G. (2000). Truth-telling and the diagnosis of dementia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 514–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popay, P.et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods Programme. Lancaster: Institute of Health Research.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. J.et al. (1991). Charting uncharted terrain: a behavioral observation system for mutual help groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 715–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, L., Bamford, C., Briel, R., Spencer, J. and Whitty, P. (2010). Improving patient-centered care for people with dementia in medical encounters: an educational intervention for old age psychiatrists. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, L.et al. (2011). The transition to dementia – individual and family experiences of receiving a diagnosis: a review. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 1026–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roter, D. and Larson, S. (2002). The Roter interaction analysis system: utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabat, S. R., Johnson, A., Swarbrick, C. and Keady, J. (2011). The ‘demented other’ or simply ‘a person’? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self. Nursing Philosophy, 12, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, E. Y. and Carpenter, B. D. (2011). Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, P. A. (1998a). “My brain's on strike’’: the construction of identity through memory accounts by dementia patients. Research on Aging, 20, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, P. A. (1998b). “You’re out of your mind!”: humor as a face-saving strategy during neuropsychological examinations. Special Issue: Mentoring and Nurturing Communication in Health Contexts. (pp. 357–372). US: Lawrence Erlbaum US.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. A., de Meiros, K. and Bartell, A. (2011). “Oh he was forgettable”: construction of self identity through use of communicative coping behaviors in the discourse of persons with cognitive impairment. Dementia (14713012), 10, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K. L., Lingler, J. H. and Schulz, R. (2009). Verbal communication among Alzheimer's disease patients, their caregivers, and primary care physicians during primary care office visits. Patient Education and Counseling, 77, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sep, M. S., van Osch, M., van Vliet, L. M., Smets, E. M. and Bensing, J. M. (2014). The power of clinicians’ affective communication: how reassurance about non-abandonment can reduce patients’ physiological arousal and increase information recall in bad news consultations. An experimental study using analogue patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 95, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivas Rao, G. and Blake, L. M. (2002). Decision-making capacity in the elderly. Primary Care Update, 9, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, R. L. Jr., (2013). How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, 286–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugarman, J.et al. (2007). Proxies and consent discussions for dementia research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 556–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, L. and McCabe, R. (2012). The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Dungen, P. et al. (2014). Preferences regarding disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 26, 1603–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Staa, A. (2011). Unraveling triadic communication in hospital consultations with adolescents with chronic conditions: the added value of mixed methods research. Patient Education and Counseling, 82, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfs, C. A.et al. (2011). Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms? Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaleta, A. K. and Carpenter, B. D. (2010). Patient-centered communication during the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 25, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaleta, A. K., Carpenter, B. D., Porensky, E. K., Xiong, C. J. and Morris, J. C. (2012). Agreement on diagnosis among patients, companions, and professionals after a dementia evaluation. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 26, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed