Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:30:26.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudes to diagnosis and management in dementia care: views of future general practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2016

Eugene Yee Hing Tang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Ratika Birdi
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Louise Robinson
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Eugene Tang, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Level 2, Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK. Phone: 0191 2088758. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Considerable international governmental support is focused on the timely diagnosis of dementia and post-diagnostic care of people with dementia. Identifying those at high risk of dementia is one approach to timely diagnosis. General practitioners (GPs) are well-placed clinicians in the community to provide both pre- and post-diagnostic dementia care. However, GPs have in the past consistently demonstrated low confidence in both diagnosing dementia and providing care for these complex patients particularly for patients in the post-diagnostic phase. It is currently unclear how future GPs view dementia care. We aimed to evaluate the current attitudes and experiences of future GPs in dementia care and their views on targeting high risk groups. All (n = 513) GP trainees were approached by email to participate in a cross-sectional web and paper-based survey in the North of England. A further reminder was sent out two months after the initial invitation. We received 153 responses (29.8% response rate, 66.7% female, average age 31 (range 25–55 years old). The main difficulties encountered included coordinating supporting services for carers and the person with dementia and responding to co-existing behavioral and psychiatric symptoms. Further education in dementia management was considered to be important by respondents. GP trainees were generally very positive about their future role in caring for people with dementia, particularly in the area of earlier diagnosis via identification of high-risk individuals. Future GPs in one area of England are very positive about their key role in dementia care. In order to facilitate the delivery of high quality, community-based care, work is required to establish core post-diagnostic dementia support services. Further research is needed to identify effective systems to enable accurate assessment and to ensure earlier diagnosis in high-risk groups.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, S., Orrell, M., Iliffe, S. and Gracie, A. (2010). GPs' attitudes, awareness, and practice regarding early diagnosis of dementia. British Journal of General Practice, 60, e360e365.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Willis, R., Matthews, D., Contell, F., Chan, J. and Murray, J. (2007). Improving the quality of care for mild to moderate dementia: an evaluation of the croydon memory service model. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 782788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borson, S. et al. (2013). Improving dementia care: the role of screening and detection of cognitive impairment. Alzheimers and Dementia, 9, 151159.Google Scholar
Cahill, S. C. M., Walsh, C., O'Connell, H. and Lawlor, B. (2006). Dementia in primary care: the first survey of Irish general practitioners. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 319324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, B. D. et al. (2008). Reaction to a dementia diagnosis in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 405412.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2015). Prime Minister's challenge on dementia 2020. Produced by Williams Lea for the Department of Health.Google Scholar
Iliffe, S. et al. (2009). Primary care and dementia: 1. diagnosis, screening and disclosure. International Journal of Geiatric Psychiatry, 24, 895901.Google Scholar
Koch, T. and Iliffe, S. (2010). Rapid appraisal of barriers to the diagnosis and management of patients with dementia in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 11, 52.Google Scholar
Moore, V. and Cahill, S. (2013). Diagnosis and disclosure of dementia—a comparative qualitative study of Irish and Swedish general practitioners. Aging and Mental Health, 17, 7784.Google Scholar
Norton, S., Matthews, F. E., Barnes, D. E., Yaffe, K. and Brayne, C. (2014). Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurology, 13, 788794.Google Scholar
Siontis, G. C., Tzoulaki, I., Siontis, K. C. and Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review. BMJ, 344, e3318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, E. Y. H. and Robinson, A. L. (2014). Dementia and primary care: views of future general practitioners. Education for Primary Care, 25, 360361.Google Scholar
Tang, E. Y. et al. (2015). Current developments in dementia risk prediction modelling: an updated systematic review. PLoS One, 10, e0136181.Google Scholar
Turner, S. et al. (2004). General practitioners' knowledge, confidence and attitudes in the diagnosis and management of dementia. Age and Ageing, 33, 461467.Google Scholar
van der Roest, H. G. et al. (2009). What do community-dwelling people with dementia need? A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 949965.Google Scholar