Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T00:26:36.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of nurse-observed symptoms of delirium in long-term care: effects on prevalence and outcomes of delirium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2010

Jane McCusker ,
Martin G. Cole ,
Philippe Voyer ,
Johanne Monette ,
Nathalie Champoux ,
Antonio Ciampi ,
Minh Vu  and
Eric Belzile
Jane McCusker*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Martin G. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Philippe Voyer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Johanne Monette
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Nathalie Champoux
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Département de médecine familiale, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Antonio Ciampi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Minh Vu
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal and Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Eric Belzile
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. J. McCusker, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital Center, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5, Canada. Phone: +1 514-435-3511-5062; Fax: +1 514-734-2652. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported that nurse detection of delirium has low sensitivity compared to a research diagnosis. As yet, no study has examined the use of nurse-observed delirium symptoms combined with research-observed delirium symptoms to diagnose delirium. Our specific aims were: (1) to describe the effect of using nurse-observed symptoms on the prevalence of delirium symptoms and diagnoses in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and (2) to compare the predictive validity of delirium diagnoses based on the use of research-observed symptoms alone with those based on research-observed and nurse-observed symptoms.

Methods: Residents aged 65 years and over of seven LTC facilities were recruited into a prospective study. Using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), research assistants (RAs) interviewed residents and nurses to assess delirium symptoms. Delirium symptoms were also abstracted independently from nursing notes. Outcomes measured at five month follow-up were: death, the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS), the Barthel ADL scale, and a composite outcome measure (death, or a 10-point decline in either the HDS or the ADL score).

Results: The prevalence of delirium among 235 LTC residents increased from 14.0% (using research-observed symptoms only) to 24.7% (using research- and nurse-observed symptoms). The relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for prediction of the composite outcome, after adjustment for covariates, were: 1.43 (0.88, 1.96) for delirium using research-observed symptoms only; 1.77 (1.13, 2.28) for delirium using research- and nurse-observed symptoms, in comparison with no delirium.

Conclusions: The inclusion of delirium symptoms observed by nurses not only increases the detection of delirium in LTC facilities but improves the prediction of outcomes.

Keywords

deliriumdetectionnursing homelong-term care
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , May 2011 , pp. 602 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. S. et al. (1992). The Delirium Symptom Interview: an interview for the detection of delirium symptoms in hospitalized patients. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 5, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickel, H. (1996). The Hierarchic Dementia Scale: usage. International Psychogeriatrics, 8, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boller, F., Verny, M., Hugonot-Diener, L. and Saxton, J. (2002). Clinical features and assessment of severe dementia: a review. European Journal of Neurology, 9, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonett, D. G. and Price, R. M. (2006). Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 3039–3047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo, G., Dubois, M.-F., Hébert, R., De Wals, P. and Messier, L. (2002). A prospective evaluation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in long-term care patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 740–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buntinx, F., Niclaes, L., Suetens, C., Jans, B., Mertens, R. and Van Den Akker, M. (2002). Evaluation of Charlson's Comorbidity Index in elderly living in nursing homes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 1144–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L. and MacKenzie, R. C. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, M. G. and Dastoor, D. P. (1987). A new hierarchic approach to the measurement of dementia. Psychosomatics, 28, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosa, D., Intrator, O., McNicoll, L., Cang, Y. and Teno, J. (2007). Preliminary derivation of a nursing home confusion assessment method based on data from the minimum data set. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 1099–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, T. S. et al. (2001). Risk factors for adverse drug events among nursing home residents. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 1629–1634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosmer, D. W. J. and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Inouye, S. K., VanDyck, C. H., Alessi, C. A., Balkin, S., Siegal, A. P. and Horwitz, R. J. (1990). Clarifying confusion: the Confusion Assessment Method, a new method for detection of delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 941–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, S. K., Rushing, J. T., Foreman, M. D., Palmer, R. M. and Pompei, P. (1998). Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiologic study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inouye, S. K., Foreman, M. D., Mion, L. C., Katz, K. H. and Cooney, L. M. Jr (2001). Nurse's recognition of delirium and its symptoms. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 2467–2473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inouye, S. K., Leo-Summers, L., Zhang, Y., Bogardus, S. T. J., Leslie, D. L. and Agostini, J. V. (2005). A chart-based method for identification of delirium: validation compared with interviewer ratings using the Confusion Assessment Method. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 312–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahoney, F. I. and Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.Google ScholarPubMed
McCusker, J., Cole, M., Dendukuri, N., Belzile, E. and Primeau, F. (2001). Delirium in older medical inpatients and subsequent cognitive and functional status: a prospective study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165, 575–583.Google ScholarPubMed
McCusker, J. et al. (2010). Prevalence and incidence of delirium in long term care. Unpublished manuscript (available from the author).Google Scholar
Rönnberg, L. and Ericsson, K. (1994). Reliability and validity of the Hierarchic Dementia Scale. International Psychogeriatrics, 6, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, S., Vanclay, F. and Cooper, B. (1989). Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voyer, P., Richard, S., Doucet, L. and Carmichael, P. (2009). Detecting delirium and subsyndromal delirium using different diagnostic criteria among demented long-term care residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, L. A., Fearing, M. A., Sternberg, E. J. and Inouye, S. K. (2008). The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 823–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. and Yu, K. F. (1998). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA, 280, 1690–1691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, Y., Cole, M., Primeau, F., McCusker, J., Bellavance, F. and Laplante, J. (1998). Detection and diagnosis of delirium in the elderly: psychiatrist diagnosis, Confusion Assessment Method or consensus diagnosis? International Psychogeriatrics, 10, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed