Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:49:03.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simple diagnostic signs in those with cognitive impairment–anything to improve detection of cognitive disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Michael C. Woodward AM*
Affiliation:
Aged Care Services, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Get access

Extract

With now over 50 million people worldwide with dementia (Prince et al., 2013), there are almost certainly well over 100 million people with cognitive concerns and many of these will attend their health professional keen to know what is going on. We need those without intensive training in this field to be more confident and correct in their diagnosis when such a concerned person turns up. Many simple diagnostic tests have been proposed and some assessed – these include the walk and talk (divided attention) test (those who stop when asked a question while walking may be cognitively impaired) (Lamoth et al., 2011), the clock drawing test (Brodaty and Moore, 1997), the “handbag” sign (those clutching their personal possessions are more likely to be cognitively impaired) and the “hippopotamus sign” (calling the rhinoceros, in those tests that include this, a hippopotamus). Simple screening tests have been extensively validated and are important to the clinician in formulating a diagnosis (Lorentz et al., 2002). The “head-turning” and the “attended with/alone” signs are frequently observed, and many clinicians assessing such individuals would be well aware of them and probably even unknowingly factor them into their diagnosis. In this issue, Pinar Soysal and colleagues (Soysal et al., 2017) have evaluated these signs and, in those older people attending with cognitive concerns, found they had quite good diagnostic value. They were not very specific but showed good sensitivity and negative predictive value. Indeed, at the recent Alzheimer's Association International Conference in London there were several posters evaluating “soft but simple” signs although not all performed as expected – one group found gait actually sped up in those with cognitive impairment that were asked a question.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brodaty, H. and Moore, C. M. (1997). The clock drawing test for dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 619627.Google Scholar
Lamoth, C. J., van Deudekom, F. J., van Campen, J. P., Appels, B. A., de Vries, O. J. and Pijnappels, M. (2011). Gait stability and variability measures show effects of impaired cognition and dual tasking in frail people. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 26.Google Scholar
Lorentz, W. J., Scanlan, J. M. and Borson, S. (2002). Brief screening tests for dementia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 723733.Google Scholar
Prince, M., Bryce, R., Albanese, E., Wimo, A., Ribeiro, W. and Ferri, C. P. (2013). The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 9, 6375.Google Scholar
Soysal, P., Usarel, C., Ispirli, G. and Isik, A. (2017). Attended with and head-turning sign can be clinical markers of cognitive impairment in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 17. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001181.Google ScholarPubMed