Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:15:40.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff (SCIDS) scale: development, reliability, and validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2012

Astrid Kristine Schepers ,
Martin Orrell ,
Niamh Shanahan  and
Aimee Spector
Astrid Kristine Schepers*
Affiliation:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK R&D, North East London Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Goodmayes, Essex, UK
Martin Orrell
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK R&D, North East London Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Goodmayes, Essex, UK
Niamh Shanahan
Affiliation:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
Aimee Spector
Affiliation:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Astrid K. Schepers, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 100 Mattison Road, London, N4 1BE, UK. Phone: +44 7788 685 669; Fax: +44 020 7679 9426. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background: Sense of competence in dementia care staff (SCIDS) may be associated with more positive attitudes to dementia among care staff and better outcomes for those being cared for. There is a need for a reliable and valid measure of sense of competence specific to dementia care staff. This study describes the development and evaluation of a measure to assess “sense of competence” in dementia care staff and reports on its psychometric properties.

Methods: The systematic measure development process involved care staff and experts. For item selection and assessment of psychometric properties, a pilot study (N = 37) and a large-scale study (N = 211) with a test–retest reliability (N = 58) sub-study were undertaken.

Results: The final measure consists of 17 items across four subscales with acceptable to good internal consistency and moderate to substantial test–retest reliability. As predicted, the measure was positively associated with work experience, job satisfaction, and person-centered approaches to dementia care, giving a first indication for its validity.

Conclusions: The SCIDS scale provides a useful and user-friendly means of measuring sense of competence in care staff. It has been developed using a robust process and has adequate psychometric properties. Further exploration of the construct and the scale's validity is warranted. It may be useful to assess the impact of training and perceived abilities and skills in dementia care.

Keywords

self-efficacyprofessional caregiverscaregiversAlzheimer'smeasure developmentpsychometric propertiesolder adultstraining needs
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 24 , Issue 7 , July 2012 , pp. 1153 - 1162
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Pajares, F. and Urdan, T. (eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Brodaty, H., Green, A. and Koschera, A. (2003). Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 657–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. D. (2009). Statistics corner: questions and answers about language testing statistics: choosing the right number of components or factors in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13, 19–23.Google Scholar
Clare, L., Baddeley, A., Moniz-Cook, E. and Woods, B. (2003). A quiet revolution. The Psychologist, 16, 250–254.Google Scholar
Davison, T. E., McCabe, M. P., Visser, S., Hudgson, C., Buchanan, G. and George, K. (2007). Controlled trial of dementia training with a peer support group for aged care staff. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 868–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health (2009). Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnema, E. et al. (2005). The effect of integrated emotion-oriented care versus usual care on elderly persons with dementia in the nursing home and on nursing assistants: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firth-Cozens, J. and Hardy, G. E. (1992). Occupational stress, clinical treatment and changes in job perceptions. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 65, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hasson, H. and Arnetz, J. E. (2008). Nursing staff competence, work strain, stress and satisfaction in elderly care: a comparison of home-based care and nursing homes. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 468–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J., Bagley, H., Reilly, S., Burns, A. and Challis, D. (2008). Care staff working with people with dementia: training, knowledge and confidence. Dementia, 7, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kuske, B., Hanns, S., Luck, T., Angermeyer, M. C., Behrens, J. and Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2007). Nursing home staff training in dementia care: a systematic review of evaluated programs. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 818–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintern, T. (2009). Improving Quality in Dementia Care: Relationships Between Care Staff Attitudes, Behaviour and Resident Quality of life. Saarbruecken: VDM Verlag Dr Mueller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. S. and Peragine, G. (2003). Measuring and enhancing self-efficacy among professional caregivers of individuals with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 18, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCallion, P., McCarron, M. and Force, L. T. (2005). A measure of subjective burden for dementia care: the caregiving difficulty scale - intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Middleton, J. I., Stewart, N. J. and Richardson, J. S. (1999). Caregiver distress related to disruptive behaviors on special care units versus traditional long-term care units. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 25, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moniz-Cook, E. et al. (2008). A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, D., Berg-Weger, M., McGillick, J. and Schwartz, L. (2002). Basic care I: the effect of dementia-specific training on certified nursing assistants and other staff. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 17, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plain English Campaign (2001). How to Write in Plain English. Available at: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/howto.pdf.Google Scholar
Schepers, A. (2010). The Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Questionnaire for Staff (SOCID-S): Development, reliability, and validity. D. Clin. Psy. thesis (Volume 1), University College London.Google Scholar
Shanahan, N. (2010). The development of a knowledge of dementia measure for residential care staff: from conceptual development to empirical evaluation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Spector, A. et al. (2003). Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teri, L., Huda, P., Gibbons, L., Young, H. and van Leynseele, J. (2005). STAR: a dementia-specific training program for staff in assisted living residences. The Gerontologist, 45, 686–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dongen, E. (2001). It isn't something to yodel about, but it exists! Faeces, nurses, social relations and status within a mental hospital. Aging and Mental Health, 5, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernooij-Dassen, M., Felling, A. and Persoon, J. (1997). Predictors of change and continuity in home care for dementia patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 671–677.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernooij-Dassen, M. J. F. J., Felling, A. J. A., Brummelkamp, E., Dauzenberg, M. G. H., van den Bos, G. A. M. and Grol, R. (1999). Assessment of caregiver's competence in dealing with the burden of caregiving for a dementia patient: a Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ) suitable for clinical practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 256–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernooij-Dassen, M., Lamers, C., Bor, J., Felling, A. and Grol, R. (2000). Prognostic factors of effectiveness of a support program for caregivers of dementia patients. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 51, 159–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, S. et al. (2005). Attitudes, stress, and satisfaction of staff who care for residents with dementia. Gerontologist, 45, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed