Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:47:16.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older patients attending a general hospital in south India: DSM-5 standards and correlates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2018

Abu P. Varghese ,
J. Prasad  and
K. S. Jacob
Abu P. Varghese
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
J. Prasad
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
K. S. Jacob*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Professor K. S. Jacob, Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632002, India. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background and Aims:

The changes in DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for dementia (Major neurocognitive disorder (NCD)) and mild cognitive impairment (mild NCD) mandate a re-evaluation of screening instruments. This study attempted to validate screening instruments, identify optimum threshold, and describe their indices of efficacy.

Method:

Consecutive people above the age of 65 years attending the outpatient department of a general hospital were recruited. They were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Vellore Screening Instruments for Dementia and were evaluated against the DSM-5 standard. Bivariate and multivariate statistics were obtained. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were drawn, optimum thresholds obtained, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values calculated.

Results:

One hundred and thirty four older people were recruited. The majority were women, married, with low levels of education, not employed, living with family, and had medical co-morbidity. A minority satisfied DSM-5 criteria for major (1.5%) and mild NCD (36.5%). The factors associated with NCD were older age, fewer years of education, and lower socio-economic status. MMSE, VSID patient, and VSID informant scores were significantly associated with NCD. The indices of efficacy for the MMSE and VSID patient version were modest for identifying Mild NCD. However, their performance in identifying major NCD was better. Nevertheless, optimal thresholds for recognition differed markedly from their originally recommended cut-offs.

Conclusions:

The DSM-5 standards, with new and different cognitive domains, mandate a revaluation and recalibration of existing screening instruments. Ideally, new screening instruments, which match the cognitive domains and DSM-5 standard should be developed.

Keywords

dementiacognitive dysfunctionmental status and dementia testsIndia
Type
Original Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 31 , Issue 1: Issue Theme: Parkinson's Disease , January 2019 , pp. 133 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA: APA.Google Scholar
Cherbuin, N., Anstey, K. J. and Lipnicki, D. M. (2008). Screening for dementia: a review of self- and informant-assessment instruments. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 431–458.Google Scholar
Díaz-Orueta, U., Blanco-Campal, A. and Burke, T. (2017). Rapid review of cognitive screening instruments in MCI: proposal for a process-based approach modification of overlapping tasks in select widely used instruments. International Psychogeriatrics, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Ferri, C. P. and Jacob, K. S. (2017). Dementia in low-income and middle-income countries: different realities mandate tailored solutions. PLoS Medicine, 14, e1002271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002271. eCollection 2017 Mar.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Ganguli, M. et al. (1995). A Hindi version of the MMSE: the development of a cognitive screening instrument for a larlely illiterate population in India. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 367–377.Google Scholar
Jacob, K. S., Kumar, S. P., Gayathri, K., Abraham, S. and Prince, M (2007a). The diagnosis of dementia in the community. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 669–678.Google Scholar
Jacob, K. S., Kumar, P. S., Gayathri, K., Abraham, S. and Prince, M. J. (2007b). Can health workers diagnose dementia in the community? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 116, 125–128.Google Scholar
Milne, A., Culverwell, A., Guss, R., Tuppen, J. and Wheton, R. (2008). Screening for dementia in primary care: a review of the efficacy and quality of measures. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 911–926.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 411–431.Google Scholar
Patel, V. and Prince, M. (2001). Aging and mental health in a developing country: who cares? Qualitative studies from Goa, India. Psychological Medicine, 31, 29–38.Google Scholar
Prince, M. et al. (2004). Effects of education and culture on the validity of the geriatric mental state and its AGECAT algorithm. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 429–436.Google Scholar
Reddy, N. B., Pallavi, M., Reddy, N. N., Reddy, C. S., Singh, R. K. and Pirabu, R. A. (2012). Psychological morbidity status among the rural geriatric population of Tamil Nadu, India: a cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 34, 227–231.Google Scholar
Scazufca, M., Almeida, O. P., Vallada, H. P., Tasse, W. A. and Menezes, P. R. (2009). Limitations of the mini-mental state examination for screening dementia in a community with low socioeconomic status: results from the Sao Paulo ageing & health study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 25, 8–15.Google Scholar
Sosa, A. L. et al. (2012). Prevalence, distribution, and impact of mild cognitive impairment in Latin America, China, and India: a 10/66 population-based study. PLoS Medicine, 9, e1001170.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. et al. (2009). The vellore screening instruments and strategies for the diagnosis of dementia in the community. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 539–547.Google Scholar
Vasantharekha, R., Priyanka, H. P., Swarnalingam, T., Srinivasan, A. V. and ThyagaRajan, S. (2017). Interrelationship between Mini-Mental State Examination scores and biochemical parameters in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 10, 1737–1745.Google Scholar