Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:29:36.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia: construct and concurrent validity in patients with mild to moderate dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2011

Sebastian Voigt-Radloff ,
Rainer Leonhart ,
Matthias Schützwohl ,
Luisa Jurjanz ,
Thomas Reuster ,
Antje Gerner ,
Kira Marschner ,
Fenna van Nes ,
Maud Graff  and
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
...Show all authors
Sebastian Voigt-Radloff*
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Therapy, Centre of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Freiburg, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
Rainer Leonhart
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, University of Freiburg, Germany
Matthias Schützwohl
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Luisa Jurjanz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Thomas Reuster
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Antje Gerner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Kira Marschner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Fenna van Nes
Affiliation:
Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Maud Graff
Affiliation:
Alzheimer Centre Nijmegen, Scientific Institute for Quality in Health Care Rehabilitation-Occupational Therapy, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Affiliation:
Alzheimer Centre Nijmegen, Scientific Institute for Quality in Health Care, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Kalorama Foundation, The Netherlands
Marcel Olde Rikkert
Affiliation:
Alzheimer Centre Nijmegen, Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Vjera Holthoff
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany
Michael Hüll
Affiliation:
Section of Gerontopsychiatry and Neuropsychology, Centre of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Freiburg, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr Sebastian Voigt-Radloff, Department of Occupational Therapy, Centre of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Freiburg, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany. Phone: +49 761 270 70860. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to translate the Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia (IDDD) into German and to evaluate the construct and concurrent validity in people with mild to moderate dementia.

Methods: IDDD data of two pooled samples (n = 301) were analyzed regarding ceiling and bottom effects, internal consistency, factor reliability and correlations with corresponding scales on cognition and activities of daily living.

Results: We found minimal bottom (< 5%) and ceiling (≤ 2%) effects, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.7) and moderate to good factor reliability (0.66–0.87). Low correlations with cognition (Pearson coefficient: < 0.17) confirmed the differences between cognitive testing and activities of daily living (ADL). Minor correlations with other ADL scores (r < 0.2) indicated that different scores cover a different range of ADLs. The original two factor model could not be confirmed. A suggested four factor model distinguishing initiative and performance of basic and instrumental ADL demonstrated better indices of fit and higher correlations with corresponding scales.

Conclusion: A four factor model of the IDDD can be used in dementia research for assessing initiative in and performance of basic and household activities of daily living. The findings suggest that ADL scales correlate only poorly and that further development of the IDDD is needed to cover a broader range of ADLs.

Keywords

activities of daily livingdementiavalidation studies
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2012 , pp. 382 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Böhm, P., Peña-Casanova, J., Aguilar, M., Hernández, G., Sol, J. M. and Blesa, R. (1998). Clinical validity and utility of the interview for deterioration of daily living in dementia for Spanish-speaking communities NORMACODEM Group. International Psychogeriatrics, 10, 261–270.Google ScholarPubMed
Bouwens, S. F., van Heugten, C. M. and Verhey, F. R. (2009). Association between cognition and daily life functioning in dementia subtypes. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 764–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapparo, C. and Ranka, J. (2006). The PRPP System of Task Analysis: User's Training Manual. Research Edition. Sydney: OP Network.Google Scholar
Cook, D. A. and Beckman, T. J. (2006) Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. American Journal of Medicine, 119, 166.e7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demers, L., Oremus, M., Perrault, A., Champoux, N. and Wolfson, C. (2000). Review of outcome measurement instruments in Alzheimer's disease drug trials: psychometric properties of functional and quality of life scales. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 13, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, A. K., Grossberg, G. T. and Sheth, D. N. (2004). Activities of daily living in patients with dementia: clinical relevance, methods of assessment and effects of treatment. CNS Drugs, 18, 853–875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erkinjuntti, T., Hokkanen, L., Sulkava, R. and Palo, J. (1988). The Blessed Dementia Scale as a screening test for dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 3, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Medicines Agency (2008). Guideline on Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias. Doc. Ref. CPMP/EWP/553/95 Rev. 1. Available at http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/055395en.pdf; last accessed 19 May 2011.Google Scholar
Frost, M. H., Reeve, B. B., Liepa, A. M., Stauffer, J. W. and Hays, R. D., for the Mayo / FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group (2007). What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health, 10 (Suppl. 2), S94–S105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galasko, D. et al. (1997). An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11 (Suppl. 2), S33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, S. et al. (2010). Effects of donepezil on activities of daily living: integrated analysis of patient data from studies in mild, moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 973–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georges, J., Jansen, S., Jackson, J., Meyrieux, A., Sadowska, A. and Selmes, M. (2008). Alzheimer's disease in real life: the dementia carer's survey. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 546–551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graff, M. J., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Thijssen, M., Dekker, J., Hoefnagels, W. H. and Rikkert, M. G. (2006). Community-based occupational therapy for patients with dementia and their care givers: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 33, 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (2009). Non-Drug Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease. Available at http://www.iqwig.de/download/A05-19D_Executive_summary_Non_drug_therapies_in_Alzheimers_disease.pdf; last accessed 19 May 2011.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Moniz-Cook, E. et al. for the INTERDEM Group (2008). A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2007). Dementia: A NICE-SCIE Guideline on Supporting People with Dementia and their Carers in Health and Social Care. National Clinical Practice Guideline no. 42 (commissioned by the Social Care Institute for Excellence and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence). London: The British Psychological Society and Gaskell.Google Scholar
Nott, M., Chapparo, C. and Heard, R. (2008). Reliability of the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform System of Task Analysis: a criterion-referenced assessment. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal (online).Google Scholar
Roth, M. et al. (1986). CAMDEX: a standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 698–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkes, S. A., de Lange-de Klerk, E. S., Pijnenburg, Y. A., Scheltens, P. and Uitdehaag, B. M. (2009). A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: room for improvement. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 80, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, V. D. and Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 268–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teunisse, S. and Derix, M. M. (1997). The interview for deterioration in daily living activities in dementia: agreement between primary and secondary carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 9 (Suppl. 1), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teunisse, S., Derix, M. M. and van Crevel, H. (1991). Assessing the severity of dementia: patient and carer. Archives of Neurology, 48, 274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H. and Deeg, D. (2011) Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7, 313–316. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt-Radloff, S. and Hüll, M. (2011). Daily functioning in dementia: pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions demonstrate small effects on heterogeneous scales – a synopsis of four health technology assessments of the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care regarding the endpoint activities of daily living. Psychiatrische Praxis. Epublished ahead of print [in German]Google Scholar
Work Group on Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias (2007). Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. Available at http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/PracticePDFs/AlzPG101007.pdf; last accessed 19 May 2011.Google Scholar