Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:06:19.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficacy of a multifactorial memory training in older adults living in residential care settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2013

Andrea Vranić ,
Ana Marija Španić ,
Barbara Carretti  and
Erika Borella
Andrea Vranić*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Ana Marija Španić
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Barbara Carretti
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy
Erika Borella*
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy
*
Andrea Vranić, Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Luciceva 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. Email: [email protected].
Correspondence should be addressed to: Erika Borella, Department of General Psychology, Via Venezia, 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Phone: +39-049-8276035; Fax: +39-049-8276600. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Several studies have shown an increase in memory performance after teaching mnemonic techniques to older participants. However, transfer effects to non-trained tasks are generally either very small, or not found.

Methods:

The present study investigates the efficacy of a multifactorial memory training program for older adults living in a residential care center. The program combines teaching of memory strategies with activities based on metacognitive (metamemory) and motivational aspects. Specific training-related gains in the Immediate list recall task (criterion task), as well as transfer effects on measures of short-term memory, long-term memory, working memory, motivational (need for cognition), and metacognitive aspects (subjective measure of one's memory) were examined. Maintenance of training benefits was assessed after seven months.

Fifty-one older adults living in a residential care center, with no cognitive impairments, participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to two programs: the experimental group attended the training program, while the active control group was involved in a program in which different psychological issues were discussed.

Results:

A benefit in the criterion task and substantial general transfer effects were found for the trained group, but not for the active control, and they were maintained at the seven months follow-up.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that training procedures, which combine teaching of strategies with metacognitive–motivational aspects, can improve cognitive functioning and attitude toward cognitive activities in older adults.

Keywords

memory trainingolder adultsstrategiestransfer effectsmetacognition
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 25 , Issue 11 , November 2013 , pp. 1885 - 1897
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borella, E., Carretti, B. and De Beni, R. (2008). Working memory and inhibition across the adult life span. Acta Psychologica, 128, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottiroli, S., Cavallini, E. and Vecchi, T. (2008). Long-term effects of memory training in the elderly: a longitudinal study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 42, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, Y., Li, S.-C., Müller, V., von Oertzen, T. and Lindenberger, U. (2007). Memory plasticity across the life span: uncovering children's latent potential. Developmental Psychology, 43, 465–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brehmer, Y.et al. (2008). Comparing memory skill maintenance across the life span: preservation in adults, increase in children. Psychology and Aging, 23, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buschkuehl, M.et al. (2008). Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 743–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calero, M. D. and Navarro, E. (2007). Cognitive plasticity as a modulating variable on the effects of memory training in elderly persons. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carretti, B., Borella, E. and De Beni, R. (2007). Does strategic memory training improve the working memory performance of younger and older adults? Experimental Psychology, 54, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carretti, B., Borella, E., Zavagnin, M. and De Beni, R. (2011a). Impact of metacognition and motivation on the efficacy of strategic memory training in older adults: analysis of specific, transfer and maintenance effects. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 52, e192–e197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carretti, B., Facchini, G. and Nicolini, C. (2011b). How autobiographical memories can support episodic recall: transfer and maintenance effect of memory training with old-old low-autonomy adults. Aging, Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallini, E., Pagnin, A. and Vecchi, T. (2003). Aging and everyday memory: the beneficial effect of memory training. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, T., Bartus, R. T., Ferris, S. H., Whitehouse, P., Cohen, G. D. and Gershon, S. (1986). Age-associated memory impairment: proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change. Report of a national institute of mental health work group. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beni, R., Borella, E., Marigo, C. and Rubini, E. (2008). Lab-I Empowerment cognitivo. Intervento e potenziamento della memoria in adulti e anziani. [Lab-I cognitive empowerment: a training to improve memory in adults and elderly people]. Firenze: Giunti O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J. and Hertzog, C. (2001). Measuring strategy production during associative learning: the relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Memory and Cognition, 29, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A. and Delaney, P. F. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 257–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, M. and Scogin, F. (1997). Effects of memory training on the subjective memory functioning and mental health of older adults: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 12, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, A. L.et al. (2012). Memory training interventions for older adults: a meta-analysis. Aging Mental Health, 16, 722–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasting, E. C. and West, R. L. (2009). The relative success of a group-based and self-help memory training program. Psychology and Aging, 24, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S. and Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, S. B. and DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarro, J., Menacho, I., Alcalde, C., Marchena, E., Ruiz, G. and Aguilar, M. (2009). Cognitive changes among institutionalized elderly people. Educational Gerontology, 35, 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piras, F., Borella, E., Incoccia, C. and Carlesimo, G. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice recommendations for memory rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 47, 149–175.Google ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C. (1994). Standard Progressive Matrices – SPM. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.Google Scholar
Reijnders, J., van Heugten, C. and van Boxtel, M. (2013). Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 12, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigsdotter-Neely, A. (2000). Multifactorial memory training in normal aging: in search of memory improvement beyond the ordinary. In Hill, R. D., Bäckman, L. and Stigsdotter-Neely, A. (eds), Cognitive Rehabilitation in Old Age (pp. 64–80). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonkovic, M. and Vranic, A. (2011). Self-evaluation of memory systems: development of the questionnaire. Aging and Mental Health, 15, 830–837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troyer, A. K. (2001). Improving memory knowledge, satisfaction, and functioning via an education and intervention program for older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 8, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A. and Goossens, L. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 7, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, R. L. and Yassuda, M. S. (2004). Aging and memory control beliefs: a performance in relation to goal setting and memory self-evaluation. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarevski, P. (1995). Provjerite pamćenje [Test your memory]. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.Google Scholar