Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T22:49:46.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

409 - Psychometric features of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) in long-term and community care settings: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2021

Mauricio Molinari Ulate ,
Aysan Mahmoudi ,
Henriëtte G. van der Roest  and
Manuel A. Franco−Martín
Mauricio Molinari Ulate
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca Department of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation
Aysan Mahmoudi
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca Department of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation
Henriëtte G. van der Roest
Affiliation:
Department on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute)
Manuel A. Franco−Martín
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca Psychiatric Department, Zamora Healthcare Complex Department on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) incorporate the key principles of integrated care delivery, which is regarded as the most effective approach of care provisioning to face challenges of dementia care, such as uncoordinated care, risk of hospitalizations, care planning and unmet needs. For this reason, implementing CGAs in care practice might be highly relevant, however, to do so, we must consider their psychometric characteristics.

Research Objective:

To provide insight into the content and the reliability and validity of CGAs used in long-term care and home care settings.

Method:

A search strategy was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science, targeting studies that have focused on the validity and reliability of available CGAs for long-term and home care settings. Studies in English and Spanish and published up to July 13, 2021, were considered.

Preliminary results of the ongoing study:

A total of 72 studies reporting on the validity/reliability of 13 different CGAs were identified. For long-term care facilities, five CGAs were reported; for home care, eight assessment tools were targeted. Most of the CGAs covered a wide range of domains, such as Physical Health, Functional, Mental Health, and Social Status. Evidence for good to excellent validity and reliability was reported for various instruments.

Conclusion:

Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) and subsequent updated instruments reported strong evidence of good to excellent validity and reliability for multiple countries. For this reason, interRAI LTCF and interRAI HC are recommended to be use for long-term and home care facilities, as they are the latest versions of the RAI-MDS.

This project is part of the Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions Innovative Training Network H2020-MSCA-ITN, under grant agreement number 813196

Type
OnDemand Free/Oral Communications
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 33 , Issue S1 , October 2021 , pp. 34 - 35
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2021