Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:33:32.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How ‘culture bound’ is ‘cultural psychiatry’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sushrut Jadhav
Sushrut Jadhav*
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences as Applied to Medicine, University College London, 48 Riding House Street, London W1N 8AA, UK, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cultural psychiatry as a clinical specialty sprung mainly from Europe and North America, in order to respond to growing concerns of ethnic minorities in high-income countries. Academic psychiatrists pursuing comparative international studies on mental health, together with medical anthropologists conducting clinical ethnographies, contributed to its theoretical basis (Kleinman, 1987; Littlewood, 1990). What at first appeared to be a marginal specialty is no longer so. For example, the UK alone has witnessed a steady growth of the field, as evidenced by its mandatory inclusion in mental health training curricula, and the existence of several taught masters courses, academic positions in universities and three dedicated journals, as well as, more recently, lead papers in mainstream publications that have debated the cultural position of ‘biology’ itself (Timimi & Taylor, 2004). Additionally, with a proliferation of clinical jobs for ‘ethnic minority’ services in hospital trusts across the country, there is ample scope for employment. The overall evidence indicates that ‘cultural psychiatry’ in the UK is now a specialty in its own right.

Type
Thematic Paper – Cultural Variations in the Perception of Psychopathology
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , April 2004 , pp. 6 - 7
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2004

References

Good, B., Good, M. & Moradi, R. (1985) The interpretation of Iranian depressive illness and dysphoric affect. In Culture and Depression: Studies in the Anthropology and Cross-cultural Psychiatry of Affective Disorder (eds Kleinman, A. & Good, B.), pp. 369–428. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jadhav, S. (1995) The cultural origins of Western depression. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 42 (special issue on the cultural validity of psychiatric diagnosis), 269–286.Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. & Young, A. (1998) Culture and somatization: clinical, epidemiological and ethnographic perspectives. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 420–430.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1987) Anthropology and psychiatry: the role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 447–454.Google Scholar
Krause, I. (1989) Sinking heart: a Punjabi communication of distress. Social Science and Medicine, 29, 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, R. (1990) From categories to contexts: a decade of the ‘new cross-cultural psychiatry’. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 308–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, O. (ed.) (1990) Divine Passions. The Social Construction of Emotion in India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Timimi, S./Taylor, E. (2004) ADHD is best understood as a cultural construct (debate). British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.