Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:45:58.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comment on the yield from national surveys of mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rachel Jenkins ,
Howard Meltzer ,
Terry Brugha  and
Paul Bebbington
Rachel Jenkins
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre, Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK, email [email protected]
Howard Meltzer
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Disability, Section of Social and Epidemiological Psychiatry, University of Leicester, UK
Terry Brugha
Affiliation:
Brandon Mental Health Unit, Section of Social and Epidemiological Psychiatry, Leicester General Hospital, UK
Paul Bebbington
Affiliation:
Social and Community Psychiatry, Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Henderson and Andrews have written a timely paper to examine the yield from national surveys, and pose questions of value for money, survey methods, delineation of pathology by categorical boundaries rather than dimensions, and breadth of risk factors examined. We would like to address the points they raise, exemplified by the purposes (Jenkins et al, 1997) and yield of the British survey programme.

Type
Original Papers
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 20 - 22
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2008

References

Bebbington, P., Dunn, A., Jenkins, R., et al (1998) The influence of age and sex on the prevalence of depressive conditions: report for the National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity. Psychological Medicine, 28, 9–19.Google Scholar
Bebbington, P. E., Meltzer, H., Brugha, T., et al (2000) Unequal access and unmet need: neurotic disorders and the use of primary care services. Psychological Medicine, 30, 1359–1367.Google Scholar
Bebbington, P. E., Bhugra, D., Brugha, T., et al (2004) Psychosis, victimisation and childhood disadvantage: evidence from the Second British National Survey of Psychiatric Epidemiology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 220–226.Google Scholar
Brugha, T. S., Morgan, Z., Bebbington, P., et al (2003) Social support networks and type of neurotic symptom among adults in British households. Psychological Medicine, 33, 307–318.Google Scholar
Brugha, T. S., Bebbington, P. E., Singleton, N., et al (2004) Trends in service use and treatment for mental disorders in adults throughout Great Britain. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 378–384.Google Scholar
Brugha, T., Singleton, N., Meltzer, H., et al (2005) Psychosis in the community and in prisons: a report from the British National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 774–780.Google Scholar
Coid, J., Yang, M., Roberts, A., et al (2006) Violence and psychiatric morbidity in a national household population – a report from the British Household Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164, 1199–1208.Google Scholar
Farrell, M., Boys, A., Singleton, N., et al (2006) Predictors of mental health service utilisation in the 12 months before imprisonment: analysis of results from a national prisons survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 548–553.Google Scholar
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Richards, H., et al (2000) The Development and Well-Being Assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 645–655.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Lewis, G., Bebbington, P., et al (1997) The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain: strategy and methods. Psychological Medicine, 27, 765–774.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Brugha, D., Meltzer, H., et al (2005) Psychiatric and social aspects of suicidal behaviour in prisons. Psychological Medicine, 35, 257–269.Google Scholar
Johns, L. C., Cannon, M., Singleton, N., et al (2004) The prevalence and correlates of self-reported psychotic symptoms in the British population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 298–305.Google Scholar
Layard, R. (2006). The case for psychological treatment centres. BMJ Clinical Research Edition, 332, 1030–1032.Google Scholar
Melzer, D., Fryers, T., Jenkins, R., et al (2003) Social position and the common mental disorders with disability: estimates from the National Psychiatric Survey of Great Britain. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 238–243.Google Scholar
Moran, P., Stewart, R., Brugha, T., et al (2007) Personality disorder and cardiovascular disease: results from a national household survey. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 69–74.Google Scholar
Skapinakis, P., Weich, S., Lewis, G., et al (2006) Socio-economic position and common mental disorders. Longitudinal study in the general population in the UK. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 109–117.Google Scholar
Targosz, S., Bebbington, P., Brugha, T., et al (2003) Lone mothers, social exclusion and depression. Psychological Medicine, 33, 715–722.Google Scholar
Vostanis, P., Brugha, T., Goodman, R., et al (2006) Relationship between parental psychopathology, parenting strategies and child mental health: findings from the GB national study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 509–514.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.