Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:01:16.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Field Experiments in International Relations: A Randomized Study of Anonymous Incorporation1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2013

Michael G. Findley
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin. E-mail: [email protected]
Daniel L. Nielson
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. E-mail: [email protected]
J.C. Sharman
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Efforts to fight international money laundering, corruption, and terrorist financing depend crucially on the prohibition barring the formation of anonymous shell companies. To study the effectiveness of this prohibition, we perform the first international relations (IR) field experiment on a global scale. With university institutional review board (IRB) clearance, we posed as consultants requesting confidential incorporation from 1,264 firms in 182 countries. Testing arguments drawn from IR theory, we probe the treatment effects of specifying (1) the international standards (managerialism), (2) penalties for noncompliance with these standards (rationalism), (3) the desire to follow norms through complying with international standards (constructivism), and (4) status as a U.S. customer. We find that firms prompted about possible legal penalties for violating standards (rationalism) were significantly less likely to respond to inquiries and less likely to comply with international law compared to the placebo condition. Some evidence also suggests that the constructivist condition caused significantly greater rates of noncompliance. The U.S. origin condition and the managerial condition had no significant effects on compliance rates. These results present anomalies for leading theories and underscore the importance of determining causal effects in IR research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreas, Peter. 2010. The Politics of Measuring Illicit Flows and Policy Effectiveness. In Sex, Drugs, and Body Counts: The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Punishment, edited by Andreas, Peter and Greenhill, Kelly M., 2345. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter, and Nadelmann, Ethan. 2006. Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K.. 2010. Conclusion: Authority, Legitimacy, and Accountability. In Who Governs the Globe? edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., 356–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, Cole, Shawn, Duflo, Esther, and Linden, Leigh. 2007. Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3):1235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baradaran, Shima, Findley, Michael, Nielson, Daniel, and Sharman, J.C.. 2013. Does International Law Matter? Minnesota Law Review 97 (3):743837.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review 94 (4):9911013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Broockman, David E.. 2011. Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India. Econometrica 72 (5):1409–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2):175205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jessica, and Dupas, Pascaline. 2010. Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (1):145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, Angus S. 2010. Instruments, Randomization, and Learning About Development. Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2):424–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 1993. The Situational Levers of Negotiating Flexibility. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (2):236–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, Daniel, Broome, Benjamin J., and Korper, Susan H.. 1988. Value Differences and Conflict Resolution: Facilitation or Delinking? Journal of Conflict Resolution 32 (3):489510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1986. Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheredge, Lloyd S. 1978. A World of Men: The Private Sources of American Foreign Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). 2006. The Misuse of Corporate Vehicles, Including Trust and Company Service Providers. Paris: FATF/OECD. Available at ⟨http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Misuse%20of%20Corporate%20Vehicles%20including%20Trusts%20and%20Company%20Services%20Providers.pdf⟩. Accessed 20 April 2013.Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). 2007. Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach to Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing: High Level Principles and Procedures. Paris: FATF/OECD. Available at ⟨http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/RBA%20ML%20and%20TF.pdf⟩. Accessed 20 April 2013.Google Scholar
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). 2012. International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation. Available at ⟨http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF_Recommendations.pdf⟩. Accessed 29 February 2012.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael G., Nielson, Daniel L., and Sharman, J.C.. Forthcoming. Global Shell Games: Experiments in Transnational Relations, Crime and Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Institutional Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friman, H. Richard, ed. 2009. Crime and the Global Political Economy. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S.. 2003. The Underprovision of Experiments in Political Science. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 589 (1):94112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, John M., and Seabrooke, Leonard, eds. 2007. Everyday Politics of the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60 (1):3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2010. Experimenting in Democracy Promotion: International Observers and the 2004 Presidential Elections in Indonesia. Perspectives on Politics 8 (2):511–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly 37 (4):459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Michael, and Reuter, Peter. 2006. Money Laundering. In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, edited by Tonry, Michael, 289375. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, Stephen D., and List, John A.. 2007. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2):153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 65 (3):682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1):142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Tingley, Dustin, Cowden, Jonathan, Frazzetto, Giovanni, and Johnson, Dominic D.P.. 2009. Monoamine Oxidase A Gene (MAOA) Predicts Behavioral Aggression Following Provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (7):2118–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mintz, Alex, and Geva, Nehemia. 1993. Why Don't Democracies Fight Each Other? An Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3):484503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, Geva, Nehemia, Redd, Steven B., and Carnes, Amy. 1997. The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making: An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform. American Political Science Review 91 (3):553–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2009. Private Governance for the Public Good? Exploring Private Sector Participation in Global Financial Regulation. In Power, Interdependence, and Non-State Actors in World Politics, edited by Milner, Helen and Moravcsik, Andrew, 126–46. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr., and Keohane, Robert O.. 1971. Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction. International Organization 25 (3):329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2001. Behind the Corporate Veil: Using Corporate Entities for Illicit Purposes. Paris: OECD. Available at ⟨http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/43703185.pdf⟩. Accessed 20 April 2013.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen, Murphy, Richard, and Chavagneux, Christian. 2010. Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2002. International Law, International Relations and Compliance. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 538–58. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redd, Steven B. 2002. The Influence of Advisers on Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (3):335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Peter, ed. 2012. Draining Development? Controlling Flows of Illicit Funds from Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2008. The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn? Working Paper 2008-0142. Cambridge, Mass.: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2003. An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions. Political Analysis 11 (2):111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2011. Testing the Global Financial Transparency Regime. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4):9811001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1998. Compliance with International Agreements. Annual Review of Political Science 1:7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2010. Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science 13:273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, Royce A. Jr., Straits, Bruce C., Straits, Margaret M., and McAllister, Ronald J.. 1985. Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 61 (4):821–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1979. Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC. Available at ⟨http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html⟩. Accessed 20 April 2013.Google Scholar
van der Does de Willebois, Emile, Halter, Emily M., Harrison, Robert A., Park, Ji Won, and Sharman, J.C.. 2011. The Puppet Masters: How the Corrupt Use Legal Structures to Hide Stolen Assets and What to Do About It. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verret, J. W. 2010. Terrorism Finance, Business Associations, and the “Incorporation Transparency Act.” Louisiana Law Review 70 (3):857910.Google Scholar
Walker, John, and Unger, Brigitte. 2009. Measuring Global Money Laundering: “The Walker Gravity Model.” Review of Law and Economics 5 (2):821–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Findlay supplementary material

Findlay supplementary material

Download Findlay supplementary material(File)
File 16.2 KB