Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:33:17.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resolve, Time, and Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

Joshua D. Kertzer
Get access

Abstract

Why do some actors in international politics display remarkable persistence in wartime, while others “cut and run” at the first sign of trouble? I offer a behavioral theory of resolve, suggesting that variation in time and risk preferences can help explain why some actors display more resolve than others. I test the theory experimentally in the context of public opinion about military interventions. The results not only help explain why certain types of costs of war loom larger for certain types of actors but also shed light on some of the behavioral revolution's contributions more broadly.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Supplement S1 , April 2017 , pp. S109 - S136
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, John, Caplin, Andrew, Leahy, John, and Tyler, Tom. 2007. Measuring Self-Control Problems. American Economic Review 97 (3):966–72.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David. 1979. Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies. World Politics 31 (2):161–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayram, A. Burcu. 2017. Due Deference: Cosmopolitan Social Identity and the Psychology of Legal Obligation in International Politics. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S137–S163.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. 2002. The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly 46 (2):263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Vohs, Kathleen D., and Tice, Dianne M.. 2007. The Strength Model of Self-Control. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (6):351–55.Google Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Tirole, Jean. 2002. Self-Confidence and Personal Motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3):871–915.Google Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Tirole, Jean. 2004. Willpower and Personal Rules. Journal of Political Economy 112 (4):848–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Jess, and Bisin, Alberto. 2005. Modelling Internal Commitment Mechanisms and Self-Control: A Neuroeconomics Approach to Consumption-Saving Decisions. Games and Economic Behavior 52 (2):460–92.Google Scholar
Boettcher, William A. III, and Cobb, Michael D.. 2006. Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6):831–54.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, H.E.. 2004. International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient? American Journal of Political Science 48 (3):604–19.Google Scholar
Clark, David H. 2003. Can Strategic Interaction Divert Diversionary Behavior? A Model of US Conflict Propensity. Journal of Politics 65 (4):1013–39.Google Scholar
Cline, Ray S. 1975. World Power Assessment: A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1986. The Multiple Self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379–414.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 52–72. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1971. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5–20.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2008. The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach. American Political Science Review 102 (1):95–106.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter D., and Reifler, Jason. 2009. Paying the Human Costs of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goemans, Hein. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, Michael, and Hirschi, Travis. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grynaviski, Eric. 2014. Constructive Illusions: Misperceiving the Origins of International Cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., and Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S1–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagger, Martin S., Wood, Chantelle, Stiff, Chris, and Chatzisarantis, Nikos L.D.. 2010. Ego Depletion and the Strength Model of Self-Control: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136 (4):495–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, Todd H., and Ross, Andrew A.G.. 2015. Affective Politics after 9/11. International Organization 69 (4):847–79.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K. 1988. The Empirical Challenge of the Cognitive Revolution: A Strategy for the Drawing Inferences About Perceptions. International Studies Quarterly 32 (2):175–203.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K. 2017. How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S61–S84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3):553–73.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J. 1970. On the Law of Effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 13 (2):243–66.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., and Stam, Allan C.. 2014. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization 68 (3):527–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1979. Deterrence Theory Revisited. World Politics 31 (2):289–324.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank. 2003. Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129 (3):339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. Forthcoming. Microfoundations in International Relations. Conflict Management and Peace Science.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., and Brutger, Ryan. 2016. Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):234–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., and Rapport, Aaron. 2012. International Relations and the Psychology of Time Horizons. International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):530–43.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2003. Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4):597–611.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason. 2010. Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy's Impact on War Outcomes and Duration. International Organization 64 (1):167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Andrew. 1974. Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics 27 (2):175–200.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 1983. Resolve, Capabilities, and the Outcomes of Interstate Disputes, 1816–1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27 (2):195–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Michaela, and Morgan, T. Clifton. 2004. When Do They Stop? Modeling the Termination of War. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (3):179–93.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscience for Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4):691–706.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Meirowitz, Adam, and Sartori, Ann E.. 2008. Strategic Uncertainty as a Cause of War. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (4):327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):77–106.Google Scholar
Mischel, Walter, and Grusec, Joan. 1967. Waiting for Rewards and Punishments: Effects of Time and Probability on Choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 (1):24–31.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1951. In Defense of the National Interest. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Brief ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1987. On the Theoretical Basis of a Measure of National Risk Attitudes. International Studies Quarterly 31 (4):423–38.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Lisa M., and Peterson, Randall S.. 2001. A Contingent Configuration Approach to Understanding the Role of Personality in Organizational Groups. Research in Organizational Behavior 23:327–78.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1971. Trends in Popular Support for the Wars in Korea and Vietnam. American Political Science Review 65 (2):358–75.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1980. The Search for the “Breaking Point” in Vietnam: The Statistics of a Deadly Quarrel. International Studies Quarterly 24 (4):497–519.Google Scholar
Myers, David G., and Lamm, Helmut. 1976. The Group Polarization Phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin 83 (4):602–27.Google Scholar
Nelson, Stephen C., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2014. Uncertainty, Risk, and the Financial Crisis of 2008. International Organization 68 (2):361–92.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 2001. Risk Aversion in International Relations Theory. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):617–49.Google Scholar
Organski, A.F.K. 1968. World Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 38 (1):1–24.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A. 1996. Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1987. Crisis Bargaining, Escalation, and MAD. American Political Science Review 81 (3):717–35.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2003. Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defense. International Security 27 (4):86–118.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Kristopher W. 2008. Settling It on the Field: Battlefield Events and War Termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (6):850–79.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S33–S59.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan, and Stam, Allan C.. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, Lee, Julia J., and Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Emotions and the Micro-Foundations of Commitment Problems. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S189–S217.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2003. Politics and International Legal Obligation. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4):591–625.Google Scholar
Rho, Sungmin, and Tomz, Michael. 2017. Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S85–S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stephen. 1972. War Power and the Willingness to Suffer. In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce M., 167–83. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1980. Thinking Theory Thoroughly. In The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, revised ed., 19–31. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2005. Deterrence by Diplomacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2017. No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S219–S247. Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization 53 (2):233–66.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1985. Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science. American Political Science Review 79 (2):293–304.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2003. The Power to Hurt: Costly Conflict with Completely Informed States. American Political Science Review 97 (1):123–33.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2010. Feigning Weakness. International Organization 64 (3):357–88.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science 236 (4799):280–85.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair, and Stam, Allan C.. 2004. Bargaining and the Nature of War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6):783–813.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stam, Allan C. III. 1996. Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Steinbruner, John D. 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streich, Philip, and Levy, Jack S.. 2007. Time Horizons, Discounting, and Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2):199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia L. 2007. War Aims and War Outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (3):496–524.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 2003. Thinking the Unthinkable: Sacred Values and Taboo Cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7):320–24.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. 2016. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review 106 (7):1577–1600.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard, and Shefrin, H.M.. 1981. An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy 89 (2):392–406.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Rising Power on the Mind. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S165–S188.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2006. Issue Indivisibility and Time Horizons as Rationalist Explanations for War. Security Studies 15 (1):34–69.Google Scholar
Trager, Robert F. 2011. Multidimensional Diplomacy. International Organization 65 (3):469–506.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A., Huth, Paul K., and Croco, Sarah E.. 2010. Bear Any Burden? How Democracies Minimize the Costs of War. Journal of Politics 72 (2):528–44.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 2007. What Good Is a Will? In Action in Context, edited by Leist, Anton, 193–215. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wang, Mei, Oliver Rieger, Marc, and Hens, Thorsten. 2016. How Time Preferences Differ: Evidence from Fifty-Three Countries. Journal of Economic Psychology 52 (1):115–35.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L.P. 2014. Dictators at War and Peace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. 1964. A Study of War. Abridged ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1968. The Politics of Force: Bargaining During International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kertzer supplementary material

Kertzer supplementary material

Download Kertzer supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 32.9 KB