Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:46:53.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Penalizing Atrocities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

Andrew H. Kydd Open the ORCID record for Andrew H. Kydd [Opens in a new window]
Andrew H. Kydd*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Syrian Civil War that began in 2011 killed more than 400,000 civilians. Could a limited intervention motivated by humanitarian concerns have reduced the death toll at an acceptable cost to the intervenors? I distinguish between two approaches to intervention: penalizing atrocities, by raising the cost and lowering the benefit of killing civilians; and fostering a balance of power, to convince the two sides that they cannot win on the battlefield and so must negotiate an end to the war. I show, using a game-theoretic model, that fostering a balance of power causes the government to commit more atrocities and prolongs the war. Penalizing atrocities, while it increases the likelihood of war, can reduce the expected level of atrocities. The model helps account for the failure of US efforts to promote negotiations by aiding Syrian rebels, and the success of efforts to deter Syrian chemical weapons use through threats and limited strikes.

Keywords

Civil wargame theoryhumanitarian interventionatrocitiesresponsibility to protectSyrian Civil War
Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , Summer 2022 , pp. 591 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The IO Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appel, Benjamin. 2018. In the Shadow of the International Criminal Court: Does the ICC Deter Human Rights Violations? Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (1):3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, Emma. 2021. Strategies of Restraint: Remaking America's Broken Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs 100 (5):128–41.Google Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan, and Enterline, Andrew J.. 2000. Killing Time: The World Politics of Civil War Duration, 1820–1992. International Studies Quarterly 44 (4):615–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan, Enterline, Andrew J., and Joyce, Kyle A.. 2008. Third-Party Intervention and the Civil War Process. Journal of Peace Research 45 (3):345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan C.. 1996. The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985. American Political Science Review 90 (2):239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Brett V. 2012. Constructing International Security: Alliances, Deterrence and Moral Hazard. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Brett V., Meirowitz, Adam, and Ramsay, Kristopher W.. 2016. Changing Capabilities, Uncertainty and the Risk of War in Crisis Bargaining. Research and Politics 3 (3) <doi:10.1177/2053168016657687>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, Gates, Scott, and Lujala, Paivi. 2009. Geography, Rebel Capability and the Duration of Civil Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):544–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher, and Gates, Scott. 2009. Asymmetry, Parity and (Civil) War: Can International Theories of Power Help Us Understand Civil War? International Interactions 35 (3):330–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chollet, Derek. 2016. The Long Game: How Obama Defied Washington and Redefined America's Role in the World. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Clayton, Govinda. 2013. Relative Rebel Strength and the Onset and Outcome of Civil War Mediation. Journal of Peace Research 50 (5):609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D. 2013. Revolutionary Leaders and International Conflict. World Politics 65 (4):656–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, Hoeffler, Anke, and Soderbom, Mans. 2004. On the Duration of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Timothy W. 2003. Pivotal Deterrence: Third-Party Statecraft and the Pursuit of Peace. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Timothy W., and Kuperman, Alan J., eds. 2006. Gambling on Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Hazard, Rebellion and Civil War. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cunningham, David E. 2010. Blocking Resolution: How External States Can Prolong Civil Wars. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2):115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Salehyan, Idean. 2009. It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):570–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRouen, Karl R. Jr., and Sobek, David. 2004. The Dynamics of Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander B. 2006. Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War. International Security 30 (4):152–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, Joan, Morelli, Massimo, and Rohner, Dominic. 2015. Strategic Mass Killing. Journal of Political Economy 123 (5):1087–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 2011. End of the Argument: How We Won the Debate over Stopping Genocide. Foreign Policy (December).Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, and Sahnoun, Mohamed. 2002. The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs 81 (6):99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favretto, Katja. 2009. Should Peacemakers Take Sides? Major Power Mediation, Coercion and Bias. American Political Science Review 103 (2):248–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1993. Threats to Use Force: Costly Signals and Bargaining in International Crises. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2004. Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others? Journal of Peace Research 41 (3):275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gent, Stephen E. 2008. Going In When It Counts: Military Intervention and the Outcome of Civil Conflicts. International Studies Quarterly 52 (4):713–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 2006. Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Regime. International Organization 60 (4):935–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoryan, Arman. 2010. Third-Party Intervention and the Escalation of State-Minority Conflicts. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4):1143–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, Havard. 2008. Gravitating Toward War: Preponderance May Pacify, but Power Kills. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (4):566–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2016. The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya. International Interactions 42 (4):616–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrooke, Richard C. 1998. To End a War. Random House.Google Scholar
Hultquist, Philip. 2013. Power Parity and Peace? The Role of Relative Power in Civil War Settlement. Journal of Peace Research 50 (5):623–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itani, Faysal. 2017. The End of American Support for Syrian Rebels Was Inevitable. The Atlantic, 21 July.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2016. Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? International Organization 70 (3):443–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Benjamin T. 2017. Altering Capabilities or Imposing Costs? Intervention Strategy and Civil War Outcomes. International Studies Quarterly 61 (1):52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutz, Joakim. 2010. How and When Armed Conflcits End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2):243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugler, Jacek, and Lemke, Douglas, eds. 1996. Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Leger. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J. 2008a. Mitigating the Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from Economics. Global Governance 14 (2):219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, Alan J. 2008b. The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly 52 (1):49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, Andrew H. 2019. The Sturdy Child vs. the Sword of Damocles: Nuclear Weapons and the Expected Cost of War. Security Studies 28 (4):645–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, Andrew H., and Straus, Scott. 2013. The Road to Hell: Third-Party Intervention to Prevent Atrocities. American Journal of Political Science 57 (3):673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1999. Give War a Chance. Foreign Affairs 78 (4):36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, David T., and Fett, Patrick J.. 1996. How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (4):546–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, David T., Weingarten, Joseph P., and Fett, Patrick J.. 1999. Win, Lose or Draw: Predicting the Outcome of Civil Wars. Political Research Quarterly 52 (2):239–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Michaela, and Savun, Burcu. 2010. Information, Agreement Design, and the Durability of Civil War Settlements. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Jacqueline R. 2019/20. Deterring Wartime Atrocities: Hard Lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal. Intenational Security 44 (3):84–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moul, William. 2003. Power Parity, Preponderance and War Between Great Powers, 1816–1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4):468–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narang, Neil. 2015. Assisting Uncertainty: How Humanitarian Aid Can Inadvertently Prolong Civil War. International Studies Quarterly 59 (1):184–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, A.F.K., and Kugler, Jacek. 1980. The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, Robert A. 2012. When Duty Calls: A Pragmatic Standard of Humanitarian Intervention. International Security 37 (1):41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1996. Stability and the Distribution of Power. World Politics 48 (1):239–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Samantha. 2002. Raising the Cost of Genocide. Dissent 49 (2):85–95.Google Scholar
Prorok, Alyssa K. 2017. The (In)compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination. International Organization 71 (2):213–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radtke, Mitchell, and Jo, Hyeran. 2018. Fighting the Hydra: United Nations Sanctions and Rebel Groups. Journal of Peace Research 55 (6):759–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, William. 2003. Information, Power and War. American Political Science Review 97 (4):633–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. 2000. Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention and Intrastate Conflict. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. 2002. Third-Party Interventions and the Duration of Intrastate Conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1):55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Aydin, Aysegul. 2006. Diplomacy and Other Forms of Intervention in Civil Wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5):736–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2009. How Wars End. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Katherine, Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher, and Reed, William. 2017. The Role of External Support in Civil War Termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (6):1174–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M., and Tennefoss, Michael R.. 1984. Power, Alliance and the Escalation of International Conflict, 1815–1965. American Political Science Review 78 (4):1057–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaperdas, Stergios. 1996. Contest Success Functions. Economic Theory 7 (2):283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2003/04. Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security 28 (3):5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, Scott. 2015. Making and Unmaking Nations: War, Leadership and Genocide in Modern Africa. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia L., and Karreth, Johannes. 2015. The Conditional Impact of Military Intervention on Internal Armed Conflict Outcomes. Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (3):269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, Fiona. 2002. Condemned to Repeat: The Paradox of Humanitarian Action. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2010. Ending Civil Wars: A Case for Rebel Victory. International Security 34 (4):7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A. 2004. Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A. 2011. The True Costs of Humanitarian Intervention: The Hard Truth About a Noble Notion. Foreign Affairs 90 (6):60–73.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A. 2014. Why We Kill: The Political Science of Political Violence Against Civilians. Annual Review of Political Science 17:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A., Huth, Paul, and Balch-Lindsay, Dylan. 2004. “Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerilla Warfare. International Organization 58 (2):375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 1997. The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement. International Organization 51 (3):335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Reed M. 2010. Rebel Capacity and Strategic Violence Against Civilians. Journal of Peace Research 47 (5):601–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Reed M., Kathman, Jacob D., and Gent, Stephen E.. 2012. Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 49 (5):647–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zartman, William I. 1989. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kydd supplementary material

Kydd supplementary material

Download Kydd supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 132.1 KB