Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:44:08.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The human rights priorities of the UN: a rejoinder to Alston

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Jack Donnelly
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Political Science at College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Similarly, the commentators that Alston lists who have cited my piece favorably cover a broad range of the non-Marxist political spectrum.

2. This is clear throughout my discussion and this focus was made quite explicit at p. 635. My use of the term “activity” rather than “doctrine” in the title may have been misleading but I think my focus was clear enough that no one should have been seriously misled.

3. The flowering of the right to development did not really come until 1979 (the Secretary-General's Report is dated January 1979). Thus it also fell largely outside the timeframe of my analysis. Nonetheless, my initial suspicion (in late 1980, when my article was written) seems t o have been confirmed by the ensuing discussion of the right to development, which reflects much of what is worst in the UN's treatment of human rights questions. For my own detailed assessment of this alleged human right, see “The Right to Development: How Not to Link Human Rights and Development,” in Welch, Claude E. Jr and Meltzer, Ronald I., eds., Human Rights and Development in Africa: Domestic, Regional and International Dilemmas (Albany: State University of New York Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar.