Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:30:03.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gulliver Untied: Entry Deterrence Under Unipolarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Joanne Gowa  and
Kristopher W. Ramsay
Get access

Abstract

That the anarchic system generates incentives for states to balance each other's power is conventional wisdom in international relations. As such, the contemporary unipolar system is an anomaly. Observers explain its existence in several ways, including the benevolence of US hegemony and the constraints international institutions impose on the exercise of US power. None of them, however, explain what is perhaps the most puzzling outcome of the Soviet collapse: the decision of the United States to maintain its level of military spending. To explain its choice, we extend the seminal argument Waltz advanced long ago to a dynamic setting. Using a simple model, we show that the interest of the unipole in deterring a challenge to its power can induce it to continue to invest in guns rather than to shift its resources to the production of butter. This strategy can enable the incumbent unipole to pre-empt the balancing process that has long been thought to be central to state survival under anarchy.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , Summer 2017 , pp. 459 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Snidal, Duncan. 1989. Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies. World Politics 41 (2):143–69.Google Scholar
Alt, James, Calvert, Randall, and Humes, Brian. 1988. Reputation and Hegemonic Stability: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. American Political Science Review 82 (1):445–66.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John M., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2003. Why Is There So Little Money in US Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1):105–30.Google Scholar
Belasco, Amy. 2014. The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11. Congressional Research Service RL33110, 21 March. Available at <https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Beckley, Michael. 2011/2012. China's Century? Why America's Edge Will Endure. International Security 36 (3):41–78.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wolhforth, William C.. 2005. Hard Times for Soft Balancing. International Security 30 (1):72–108.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wolhforth, William C.. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wolhforth, William C.. 2015/16. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position. International Security 40 (3):7–53.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2002. Remarks to the US Military Academy. <http://www.cfr.org/world/remarks-us-military-academy/p5664>..>Google Scholar
Chilcoat, Robert A., and Henderson, David S.. 1994. Army Prepositioning Afloat. Joint Force Quarterly 4 (Spring): 51–57.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 2015. The China Challenge. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994–1999. 16 April 1992. Available at <http://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/pdf/2008-003-docs1-12.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Department of Defense. 2012. Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for Twenty-first Century Defense. Available at <http://archive.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Department of Defense. 2013. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China. Office of the Secretary of Defense. Avaiable at <http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/2013_China_Report_FINAL.pdf>..' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ADA582894>CrossRef.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Department+of+Defense.+2013.+Annual+Report+to+Congress:+Military+and+Security+Developments+Involving+the+People's+Republic+of+China.+Office+of+the+Secretary+of+Defense.+Avaiable+at+.>Google Scholar
Department of Defense. 2014a. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China. Office of the Secretary of Defense. Avaiable at <https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2014_DoD_China_Report.pdf>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Department+of+Defense.+2014a.+Annual+Report+to+Congress:+Military+and+Security+Developments+Involving+the+People's+Republic+of+China.+Office+of+the+Secretary+of+Defense.+Avaiable+at+.>Google Scholar
Department of Defense. 2014b. Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request Overview. Office of the Undersecretary of Defense/Chief Financial Officer. March. Available at <http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2015/fy2015_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Department of Defense, 2015a. The Asia-Pacific Maritime Security Strategy: Achieving US National Security Objectives in a Changing Environment. http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/NDAA Google Scholar
Department of Defense. 2015b. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China. Office of the Secretary of Defense. Available at <https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/NDAA%20A-P_Maritime_SecuritY_Strategy-08142015-1300-FINALFORMAT.PDF>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Department+of+Defense.+2015b.+Annual+Report+to+Congress:+Military+and+Security+Developments+Involving+the+People's+Republic+of+China.+Office+of+the+Secretary+of+Defense.+Available+at+.>Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash. 1980. The Role of Investment in Entry-Deterrence. The Economic Journal 90 (357):95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash. 1987. Strategic Behavior in Contests. The American Economic Review 77 (5):891–898.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Gregg. 2015. Our Navy Is Big Enough. The New York Times, 9 March, A17.Google Scholar
Erickson, Andrew S., and Strange, Austin M.. 2014. Ripples of Change in Chinese Foreign Policy? Evidence from Recent Approaches to Nontraditional Waterborne Security. Asia Policy 17 (1):93–126.Google Scholar
Fraumeni, Barbara M. 1997. The Measurement of Depreciation in US National Income and Product Accounts. Survey of Current Business July:7–23.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew, and Tirole, Jean. 1983. Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gholz, Eugene, and Sapolsky, Harvey M.. 1999/2000. Restructuring the US Defense Industry. International Security 24 (3):5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 2011. Why Unipolarity Doesn't Matter (Much). Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24 (2):135–47.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Avery. 1995. Discounting the Free Ride: Alliances and Security in the Postwar World. International Organization 49 (1):39–71.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Ken, Palmer, Robert R., and Wiley, Bell I.. 2004. The Organization of Ground Combat Troops. Washington, DC: Center for Military History.Google Scholar
Huff, David. 2001. Overseas Prepositioning—The Key to Forward Deterrence. Sea Power 44 (11):39–41.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2003. Is American Multilateralism in Decline? Perspectives on Politics 1 (3):533–50.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, Mastanduno, Michael, and Wohlforth, William. 2009. Introduction: Unipolarity, State Behavior and Systemic Consequences. World Politics 61 (1):1–27.Google Scholar
International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS). 2010. The Military Balance 110, 1.Google Scholar
International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS). 2012. The Military Balance 112, 1.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2009. Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective. World Politics 61 (1):188–213.Google Scholar
Joffe, Joseph. 1997. How America Does It. Foreign Affairs 76 (5):13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2013. How New and Assertive Is China's New Assertiveness? International Security 37 (4):7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klien, Margret. 2009. Russian Military Capabilities: Great Power Ambitions and Reality. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper #12.Google Scholar
Kristensen, M. Hans. 2005. US Nuclear Weapons in Europe: A Review of Post-Cold War Policy, Force Levels, and War Planning. Natural Resources Defense Council Report. Available at <https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/euro.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert Z. 2006. China and the Multilateral Trading System. NBER Working Paper No. 12759. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher. 2012. This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax America. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):203–13.Google Scholar
Liff, Adam P., and Erickson, Andrew S.. 2013. Demystifying China's Defence Spending: Less Mysterious in the Aggregate. The China Quarterly 216:805–30.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Julie A., Donahue, Amy, and Danyluk, Bethany. 2004. Energy Futures in Asia: Final Report. Washington, DC: Booz, Allen, Hamilton.Google Scholar
Mizokami, Kyle, 2014. Five Chinese Weapons of War America Should Fear. The National Interest. 7 May. <http://nationalinterest.org/feature/five-chinese-weapons-war-america-should-fear-10388>. Accessed 16 December 2016..+Accessed+16+December+2016.>Google Scholar
Norris, Robert S., and Kristensen, Hans M.. 2010. Global Nuclear Weapons Inventories: 1945–2010. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 66 (4):77–83.Google Scholar
OECD Science, Technology, and R&D Statistics. 2017. Government Budget Appropriations for Outlays for R&D. Available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00194-en>, Accessed 23 May 2017.,+Accessed+23+May+2017.>Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry. 2003. Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of US Hegemony. International Security 28 (1):5–46.Google Scholar
Rogers, James, and Simon, Luis. 2009. The Status and Location of the Military Installations of the Member States of the European Union and Their Potential Role for the European Security and Defense Policy. Directorate General External Policies of the Union Briefing Paper. 19 February. Available at <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2009/407004/EXPO-SEDE_NT(2009)407004_EN.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce, 19–49. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2011. Military Threats: The Costs of Coercion and the Price of Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, James, and O'Hanlon, Michael E.. 2014. Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: US–China Relations in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. N.d. Military Expenditures Database. <http://www.sipri.org/databases/milex> Accessed 16 December 2016.+Accessed+16+December+2016.>Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. SIPRI Yearbook 2008: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2002. Can Special Interests Buy Congressional Votes? Evidence from Financial Services Legislation. Journal of Law and Economics 45 (2):345–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellis, Ashley J., Bially, Janice, Layne, Christopher, and McPherson, Melissa. 2000. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2015. World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance. Geneva: United Nations Available at <http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2008. Alliances in a Unipolar World. World Politics 86 (1):86–120.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2009. Alliances in a Unipolar World. World Politics 61 (1):86–120.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, UK: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security 24 (1):5–41.Google Scholar
Wolf, Charles Jr., Yeh, K.C., Bamezai, Anil, Henry, Donald P., and Kennedy, Michael. 1994. Long-Term Economic and Military Trends in Asia 1994–2015: The United States and Asia. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2014. Modest Trade Growth Anticipated for 2014 and 2015 Following Two Year Slump. Press Release 721. 14 April. <https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres14_e/pr721_e.htm>. Accessed 16 December 2016..+Accessed+16+December+2016.>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2015. An In-depth Look at China. <https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/tprflyer2015_e.pdf>. Accessed 16 December 2016..+Accessed+16+December+2016.>Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gowa and Ramsay supplementary material

Gowa and Ramsay supplementary material

Download Gowa and Ramsay supplementary material(File)
File 17.6 KB