Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:48:40.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency: Refugees from Objectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

Amos Perlmutter has raised an interesting series of points in his commentary on my recent article concerning the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). As I understand the crux of his argument, it is as follows. “From the outset UNRWA was a political organization” (p. 307). Despite this fact I have displayed a “low level of political judgment” (p. 306) which has led me to focus neither on the decisions rendered by UNRWA's commissioner-general nor on the future impact of UNRWA and the ways in which it can contribute to stability in the Middle East. Presumably these latter two types of analysis would be “high-level political judgments” (p. 308).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Perlmutter, Amos, “Patrons in the Babylonian Captivity of Clients: UNRWA and World Politics,” International Organization, Spring 1971 (Vol. 25, No. 2), pp. 306308CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Forsythe, David P., “UNRWA, the Palestine Refugees, and World Politics: 1949–1969,” International Organization, Winter 1971 (Vol. 25, No. 1), pp. 2645CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 I did this in my article; see ibid., p. 38, footnote 35. One could draw the same conclusion from Davis's, John recent book, The Evasive Peace: A Study of the Zionist-Arab Problem (London: John Murray, 1968)Google Scholar.

4 Stegenga, James A., “On Book Reviews,” PS, Spring 1971 (Vol. 4, No. 2), pp. 145146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.