Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:07:20.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Globalization, the Macro Economy, and Reversals of Welfare: Expansion in Affluent Democracies, 1978–94

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2005

Alexander Hicks  and
Christopher Zorn
Alexander Hicks
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, [email protected]
Christopher Zorn
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, Columbia, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A key question in debates over globalization is its effect on the welfare states in particular on welfare “retrenchments”: programmatic retractions of the scope and coverage of social programs. We conceptualize such retrenchments as discrete policy events; and we offer a comprehensive model of their occurrence that integrates domestic economic, political, and institutional factors as well as those related to the global economy. Our analysis of all such retrenchments in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations between 1978 and 1994 indicates that the effects of globalization are complex, with trade openness and financial liberalization clearly operating against such retrenchments but outward foreign direct investment perhaps pressuring for them. In addition, we uncover support for a dynamic of “self-limiting immoderation”: economic and demographic pressures for costly welfare expenditures provoke actions to roll back eligibility and benefit rates that link increasing numbers of unemployed and retired persons to increased social spending. In short, the same demographic pressures that gave often been noted to substantially drive welfare spending may trigger welfare cutbacks.Our thanks to A. A. Alderson, Bob Jackman, Lane Kenworthy, Joakim Palme, Duane Swank, John Stephen, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and discussions, as well as to Kendralin Freedman for her work preparing the final manuscript. All remaining errors are our own. Previous versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association and the American Sociological Association. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the National Science Foundation or the U.S. government. All data and commands necessary to replicate the analyses presented here are available at our Web site 〈http://polisci.emory.edu/zorn/HZ/index.html〉.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 631 - 662
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of the Other Independent Variables. Paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, July, University of California at Los Angeles.
Alber, Jens. 1998. Recent Developments in Continental European Welfare States: Do Austria, Germany and the Netherlands Prove to Be Birds of a Feather? Paper Presented at the 14th World Conference of Sociology, July, Montreal, Canada.
Alderson, Arthur S. 1999. Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success? American Sociological Review 64 (5):701–21.Google Scholar
Allan, James P., and Lyle Scruggs. 2004. Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3):496–512.Google Scholar
Alwin, Duane, and Robert Hauser. 1975. The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis. American Sociological Review 40 (1):37–47.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. 2001. A Review of “Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism.” Contemporary Sociology 30 (4):383–84.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89 (3):634–47.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1996. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series–Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6 (1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 2004. Time-Series Cross-Section Data Analysis: 2004. Paper presented at the Annual Summer Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, July–August, Stanford University, Calif.
Birchfield, Vicki, and Markus M.L. Crepaz. 1998. The Impact of Constitutional Structures and Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Income Inequality in Industrialized Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 34 (2):175–200.Google Scholar
Bluestone, Barry, and Bennett Harrison. 1982. The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.
Boix, Carles. 2001. Democracy, Development, and the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christopher Zorn. 2002. Duration Models for Repeated Events. Journal of Politics 64 (4):1069–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David, Evelyn Huber, Stephanie Moller, Francois Nielsen, and John D. Stephens. 2003. Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies. World Politics 55 (2):193–228.Google Scholar
Brady, David. 2003. The Politics of Poverty: Left Political Institutions, the Welfare State and Poverty. Social Forces 82 (2):557–88.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind. International Organization 55 (3):509–51.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72 (4):1243–61.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1984. Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society. In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by John H. Goldthorpe, 143–78. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression Models and Life Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34 (2):187–220.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert H. 1993. The Development of the Dutch Welfare State: from Workers' Insurance to Universal Entitlement. Pittsburgh, Penn.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1985. Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. The Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feldstein, Martin, ed. 1998. Privatizing Social Security. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fleming, Thomas R., and David P. Harrington. 1991. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York: Wiley.
Fligstein, Neil. 2002. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Flora, Peter. 1986. Growth to Limits: the Western European Welfare States Since World War II, Vols. 1, 2, 3, 4. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Franzese, Robert J. 2002. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Thomas L. 2000. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Anchor.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998a. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998b. Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? International Organization 52 (4):787–824.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Deborah Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39 (2):145–77.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam, Peter Lange, and Michael Wallerstein. 1993. Trends in Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations in Non-Corporatist Countries: A Preliminary Report. Paper Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Washington, D.C.
Gordon, Andrew. 1998. The Wages of Affluence: Labor and Management in Post-War Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2003. Small States, Big Success: Party Politics and Governing the Economy in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1973 to 2000. Socioeconomic Review 1 (37):411–37.Google Scholar
Greider, William. 1997. One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hall, P. A., and David Soskice. 2001. An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism, edited by P. A. Hall and David Soskice, 1–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hewitt, Christopher. 1977. The Effects of Political Democracy and Social Democracy on Equality in Industrial Societies: A Cross-Sectional Comparison. American Sociological Review 42 (3):450–64.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1999. Social Democracy & Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Hicks, Alexander, and Gøsta Esping-Andersen. 2005. Introduction to the Comparative and Historical Political Sociology of the Welfare State. In Handbook of Political Sociology, edited by Thomas Janoski, Robert Alford, Alexander Hicks, and Mildred Schwartz. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, Alexander, and Joya Misra. 1993. Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Capitalist Democracies, 1960–1982. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):668–710.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Duane Swank. 1992. Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review 86 (2):658–674.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 1998. Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model—Crisis and Future Prospects. Comparative Political Studies 31 (3):353–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin, and John D. Stephens. 1993. Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):711–49.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Selected years. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen, Torben. 2001. The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, De-Industrialization and Partisan Politics. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 45–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iversen, Torben, and Thomas R. Cusack. 2000. The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization? World Politics 52 (3):313–49.Google Scholar
Judge, George G. R., Carter Hill, W. E. Griffiths, Helmut Lütkepohl, and Tsoung-Chao Lee. 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Wiley.
Kenworthy, Lane. 2001. Wage Setting Measures: A Survey and Assessment. World Politics 54 (1):57–98.Google Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, and Hannes Winner. Forthcoming. How Reliable Is Pooled Data in Political Economy: The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus? European Journal of Political Research 44 (2).
Korpi, Walter, and Joakim Palme. 2003. New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–1995. American Political Science Review 97 (3):425–46.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1995. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lange, Peter, and Geoffrey Garrett. 1985. The Politics of Growth: Strategic Interaction and Economic Performance in the Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1974–1980. Journal of Politics 47 (3):792–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Moller, Stephanie, David Bradley, Evelyne Huber, Francois Nielsen, and John D. Stephens. 2003. Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies. American Sociological Review 68 (1):22–51.Google Scholar
Myles, John, and Paul Pierson. 1997. Friedman's Revenge: The Reform of “Liberal” Welfare States in Canada and the United States. Politics and Society 25 (4):443–72.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1994. New Directions in Social Policy. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1996a. International Sectoral Data Base. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1996b. Social Expenditure Statistics of OECD Member Countries. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. Economic Outlook. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. Labor Force Statistics. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Selected years. National Accounts of OECD Member Nations. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Forthcoming. OECD Database on Entitlements and Replacement Rates. Paris: OECD.
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 1996. The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics 48 (2):143–79.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001a. Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 80–104. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2001b. Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 410–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ploemper, Thomas, Vera E. Troeger, and Philip Manow. Forthcoming. Panel Data in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2).
Quinn, Dennis. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review 91 (3):531–51.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis, and Carla Inclan. 1997. The Origins of Financial Openness: A Study of Current and Capital Account Liberalization. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3):771–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has International Economic Integration Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy. 106 (5):997–1032.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf, Fritz, and Vivien A. Schmidt. 2000. Conclusions. In Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Volume 1: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, edited by Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt, 310–36. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
StataCorp. 2004. Stata 8.0. College Station, Texas: StataCorp.
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.
Swank, Duane H. 2002. Diminished Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision-Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3):289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. Selected years. Demographic Yearbook. New York: United Nations.
Weede, Erich. 1995. Economic Development, Social Order, and World Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
Western, Bruce. 1997. Between Class and Market: Postwar Unionization in the Capitalist Democracies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
White, Halbert. 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (4):817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 1981. Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism. In The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, edited by Peter Flora and Arnold Heidenheimer, 345–82. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Williamson, John. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, edited by John Williamson, 5–20. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.