Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2009
The British Commonwealth of Nations and the United Nations have today at least one thing in common, namely, that each faces a crisis so serious as to threaten its very survival. Nor are the reasons for the crises so very different. In part they stem from the nature of the two institutions. Both are associations of sovereign states, each one of which views the Commonwealth or United Nations relationship as only one strand–and only rarely the most important strand–in a complex and variegated web of relationships.
1 Holmes, John, “The Impact on the Commonwealth of the Emergence of Africa,” International Organization, Spring 1962 (Vol. 16, No. 2), p. 298CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 There are rare exceptions, such as the declarations of the Commonwealth Prime Ministers on Korea in January 1951 or on disarmament in March 1961.
3 Fawcett, James E. S., The British Commonwealth in International Law (Stevens Library of World Affairs, No. 61) (London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1963), p. 144Google Scholar.
4 International Court of Justice, Yearbook 1958–1959 (Leyden: A. W. Sythoff, 1959), p. 226Google Scholar.
5 Fawcett, James E. S., “The Commonwealth in the United Nations,” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 05 1962 (Vol. 1, No. 2), p. 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 United Kingdom, Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 04 7, 1964 (Vol. 257, No. 47), col. 116Google Scholar.
7 See Millar, Thomas B., “The Commonwealth and the United Nations,” International Organization, Autumn 1962 (Vol. 16, No. 4), p. 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 The Spectator, May 15, 1964.
9 Millar, , International Organization, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 745Google Scholar.
10 Claude, Inis L. Jr., Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization (2nd ed.; New York: Random House, 1959), p. 122Google Scholar.
11 See Harnelly, Peter, “Canada, South Africa, and the Commonwealth 1960–61,” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 11 1963 (Vol. 2, No. 1), p. 39Google Scholar.
12 A disillusion which was deepened by the Indian use of force in Goa and by the withering away of parliamentary democratic forms of government in several Commonwealth countries.
13 Baker, Philip Noel, “Korea, the Commonwealth and World Peace,” New Commonwealth, 08 31, 1953 (Vol. 26, No. 5), p. 217Google Scholar.
14 Barclay, C. N., The First Commonwealth Division: The Story of British Commonwealth Land Forces in Korea (London: Gale and Polden, 1954)Google Scholar.
15 Holmes, John, “The United Nations in the Congo,” International Journal (Toronto), Winter 1960–1961 (Vol. 16, No. 1), p, 14Google Scholar.
16 See Eayrs, James (ed.), The Commonwealth and Suez: A Documentary Survey (London: Oxford University Press, 1964), p. 287Google Scholar.
17 For the Foreign Secretary's statement, see United Kingdom, Parliamentary Debates (Commons), 02 23, 1965 (Vol. 707, No. 63), cols. 234–236Google Scholar.
18 The Economist, 02 27, 1965 (Vol. 214, No. 6340), p. 875Google Scholar.
19 See Aid to Developing Countries (Cmnd. 2147) (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 09 1963), p. 15, for the figures for the geographical distribution of British aid from which these percentages are derivedGoogle Scholar.
20 Although the initiative came from Paul Hoffman and the main backing from President John F. Kennedy.
21 This is not, of course, to overlook the heavy drawings by the United Kingdom on the International Monetary Fund (IMF). For details of aid figures, see The Flow of Financial Resources to Less-Developed Countries, 1956–1963 (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1964)Google Scholar.
22 Myrdal, Gunnar, An International Economy: Problems and Prospects (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956), pp. 7–8Google Scholar.
23 Holmes, , International Organization, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 301Google Scholar.
24 Burke, Edmund, Speeches and Letters on American Affairs (London: J. M. Dent [Everyman's Library], 1956), p. 189Google Scholar.