Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T09:29:57.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
International Organization , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , Summer 2000 , pp. 685 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Frederick M. 1990. GATT and the European Community: A Formula for Peaceful Coexistence. Michigan Journal of International Law 12 (1): 1–58.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1992a. Integration Without Institutions: The NAFTA Mutation of the EC Model and the Future of the GATT Regime. American Journal of Comparative Law 40:917–8.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1992b. Regional Integration and the Environment: The Evolution of Legal Regimes. Chicago Kent Law Review 68:173–201.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1993a. NAFTA and the Future of United States—European Community Trade Relations: The Consequences of Asymmetry in an Emerging Era of Regionalism. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 16: 489–526.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1993b. Regional Integration Mechanisms in the Law of the United States: Starting Over. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 1:155–184.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1995a. Law and Policy of Regional Integration: The NAFTA and Western Hemispheric Integration in the World Trade Organization System. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff/Kluwer.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1995b. The Maastricht Judgment, the Democracy Principle, and U.S. Participation in Western Hemispheric Integration. In German Yearbook of International Law 1994, 137–61. Berlin: Duncker and Humbolt.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1997a. The Intersection of Law and Trade in the WTO System: Economics and the Transition to a Hard Law System. In Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade, edited by Orden, David and Roberts, Donna, 33–48. Minneapolis, Minn.: International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 1997b. Foundation Building for Western Hemispheric Integration. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 17: 900–46.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. 2000. The North American Integration Regime and Its Implications for the World Trading System. In The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA, edited by Weiler, J. H. H., 171–99. Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol. 10, bk. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 1997. The Many Faces of Legalization. Paper presented at the Conference on International Law and Domestic Politics, 4–7 June, St. Helena, Calif.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. Why States Use Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1):3–32.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. International Standards and International Governance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 1998. Collective Identity and Conflict Management in Southeast Asia. In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, 198–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 1999. Realism, Insitutionalism, and the Asian Economic Crisis. Contemporary Southeast Asia 21 (1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod, Keohane, Robert O., and Yoffie, David. 1987. The Dynamics of Negotiated Protection. American Political Science Review 81:345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, Frieden, Jeffry, Gilligan, Michael, Rodrick, Dani, and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. The Political Economy of International Trade: Enduring Puzzles and an Agenda for Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies 29 (6):689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 1996a. The European Court's Political Power. West European Politics 19 (3):458–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 1996b. The Making of a Rule of Law: The European Court and the National Judiciaries. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 1998a. Explaining National Court Acceptance of European Court Jurisprudence: A Critical Evaluation of Theories of Legal Integration. In The European Court and National Court—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 227–52. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 1998b. Who Are the Masters of the Treaty? European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1): 121–47.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2000. Regime Design Matters: Designing International Legal Systems for Maximum or Minimum Effectiveness. Paper presented at the 41st International Studies Association Conference, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. Forthcoming. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe: The European Court of Justice and the National Judiciaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Vargas, Jeannette. 2000. Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: EC Law and UK Gender Equality Policy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (4):316–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Alejandro. 1943. La Reconstrucción del Derecho de Gentes. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Nascimento.Google Scholar
Watch, Americas. 1986. Paraguay: Latin America's Oldest Dictatorship Under Pressure. New York: Americas Watch.Google Scholar
Watch, Americas. 1995. Rule by Fear: Paraguay After Thirty Years Under Stroessner. New York: Americas Watch.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1975. Report on Torture. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1977a. Deaths Under Torture and Disappearance of Political Prisoners in Paraguay. New York: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1977.b Report of an Amnesty International Mission to Argentina. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1981. “Disappearances”: A Workbook. New York: AIUSA.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1984. Torture in the Eighties. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1999. Annual Report 1999. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
APEC. 1998. Convenor's Summary Report on Dispute Mediation. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat. Available at <www.apecsec.org.sg/cti/cti98rpt2mins98a1_10.html>..>Google Scholar
APEC Eminent Persons Group. 1993. A Vision for APEC: Towards An Asia Pacific Economic Community. Report of the Eminent Persons Group to APEC Ministers. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat.Google Scholar
APEC Eminent Persons Group. 1994. Achieving the APEC Vision: Free and Open Trade in the Asia Pacific. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat.Google Scholar
APEC Eminent Persons Group. 1995. Implementing the APEC Vision. Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat.Google Scholar
Asamblea Permanente por los Derechos Humanos. 1988. Las Cifras de la Guerra Sucia. Buenos Aires: Asamblea Permanente por los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
ASEAN Regional Forum. 1999. Chaiman's Statement. The Sixth Meeting of the ASEAN Regional Forum. Singapore 26 July 1999. Available at <www.dfat.gov.au/arf/990799_arf_chairman.html>..>Google Scholar
ASEAN Secretariat. 1997. ASEAN Economic Co-operation: Transition and Transformation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Goldstein, Judith, and Weingast, Barry. 1997. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 49 (3):309–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. 1998. Imposing Multilateral Discipline on Administered Protection. In The WTO as an International Organization, edited by Krueger, Anne, 297–327. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Carlos. 1996. The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Society: The Court of Justice, Social Policy, and Individual Rights Under the European Community's Legal Order. Harvard International Law Journal 37 (2):307–88.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 1997. Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Maude, and Campbell, Bruce. 1993. Take Back the Nation: Meeting the Threat of NAFTA. Rev. ed. Toronto: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
Barnard, Catherine. 1995. A European Litigation Strategy: The Case of the Equal Opportunities Commission. In New Legal Dynamics of European Union, edited by Shaw, J. and More, G., 254–72. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary Jonathan. 1998. Judging War: The Politics of International War Crimes Tribunals. Ph.D. diss., Harvard. University.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, compiler. 1998. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History. New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ed. 1999. International Criminal Law, Vols. I–III. 2d ed. New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Baxter, R. R. 1980. International Law in Her Infinite Variety. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 29:549–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebr, Gerard. 1981. Development of Judicial Control of the European Communities. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bebr, Gerard. 1983. The Rambling Ghost of Cohn-Bendit: Acte Clair and the Court of Justice. Common Market Law Reviews 20:439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.Google Scholar
Bello, Judith Hippler. 1996. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More. American Journal of International Law 90:416–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred. 1994. Sunrise in Seattle. International Economic Insights 5 (January–February):18–20.Google Scholar
Bermann, George A. 1998. Constitutional Implications of U.S. Participation in Regional Integration. American Journal of Comparative Law 46:463–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Nicolas. 1996. The Future of European Economic Law in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity. Common Market Law Review 33:633–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Rudolf. 1994. Human Rights and Judicial Review: The European Court of Human Rights. In Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Beatty, David M., 297–319. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard B. 1981. Managing the Risks of International Agreement. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard. 1996. Changes in Political Regimes and Continuity of the Rule of Law in Germany. In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert, Provine, Doris Marie, and Sanders, Joseph, 249–316. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, Judith, Fitzpatrick, Barry, Gregory, Jeanne, Knegt, Robert, and O'Hare, Ursula. 1995. The Utilisation of Sex Equality Litigation Procedures in the Member States of the European Community, a Comparative Study. Brussels: Commission of the European Union, DG V.Google Scholar
Bodiguel, Jean-Luc. 1981. L'Ecole Nationale d'Administration et ses Implications sur la Haute Fonction Public. Ph.D. diss., Institute d'Etudes Politiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Boehlhoff, Klaus, and Baumanns, Axel. 1989. Extra-Territorial Recognition of Exchange Control Regulations—A German Viewpoint. In Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance, edited by Horn, Norbert, 107–24. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 1998. Policy Guidance and Compliance Issues in Financial Activities: The World Bank Operational Standards. Paper prepared for meeting of American Society of International Law Project on Compliance with Soft Law, 8–10 October, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Briggs, Herbert W. 1985. Nicaragua v. United States: Jurisdiction and Admissibility. American Journal of International Law 79:373–78.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. 1984. The Expansion of International Society: The Consequences for the Law of Nations. In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 357–70. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buira, Ariel. 1983. The Exchange Crisis and the Adjustment Program in Mexico. In Prospects for Adjustment in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, edited by Williamson, John, 51–60. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1):41–76.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1993. From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization 47:327–52.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James, and Keeler, John. 1995. The European Union and Regional Integration Theory. In The State of the European Union, edited by Rhodes, Carolyn and Mazey, Sonia, 29–62. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner/Longmann.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro, and Golay, David. 1986. The Judicial Branch in the Federal and Transnational Union: Its Impact on Integration. In Methods, Tools, and Institutions: Political Organs, Integration Techniques, and Judicial Process, edited by Cappelletti, M., Seccombe, M., and Weiler, J., 261–348. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carman, Gregory W. 1997. Resolution of Trade Disputes by Chapter 19 Panels: A Long-term Solution or Interim Procedure of Dubious Constitutionality. Fordham International Law Journal 21:1–11.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1939. The Twenty Years'Crisis 1919–1939. London: The Macmillan Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1946. The Twenty Years'Crisis, 1919–1939. 2d ed. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Miguel. 1990. The Role of the Paraguayan Catholic Church in the Downfall of the Stroessner Regime. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 32 (4):67–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassia, Paul, and Saulnier, Emmanuelle. 1997. L'Imbroglio de la Banane. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européene (411):527–44.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Damian. 1997. Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order. Modern Law Review 60 (2):164–99.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Damian. 2000a. The Much Ado About Judicial Politics in the United Kingdom: A Statistical Analysis of Reported Decisions of United Kingdom Courts Invoking EU Law 1973–1998. Jean Monnet Working Paper. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Law School.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Damian. 2000b. The Positioning of EU Judicial Politics Within the United Kingdom. West European Politics 23 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I. 1994. Progress in Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law. American Journal of International Law 88 (2):227–56.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I. 1999. The Impact on the International Legal System of the Growth of International Courts and Tribunals. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):697–708.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. 1965. A Common Lawyer Looks at International Law. Harvard Law Review 78 (7):1396–1413.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2):175–205.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tun-jen. 1998. APEC and the Asian Financial Crisis: A Lost Opportunity for Institution-Building? Asian Journal of Political Science 6 (2):21–32.Google Scholar
Chia, Siow Yue. 1996. The Deepening and Widening of ASEAN. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 1 (1):59–78.Google Scholar
Chinkin, C. M. 1989. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38:850–66.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie. Forthcoming. Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. V. O. 1977. Exchange Stabilization in the Mid-1930s: Negotiating the Tripartite Agreement. Studies in International Finance, 41. Princeton, N.J.: International Financial Section, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. 1966. Collective Legitimation as a Political Function of the United Nations. International Organization 20 (3):367–79.Google Scholar
Claude, Richard P. 1992. The Case of Joelito Filártiga in the Courts. In Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Action, 2d ed., edited by Claude, Richard and Weston, Burns, 328–39. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 1998. The Geography of Money. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Colombatto, Enrico, and Macey, Jonathan R.. 1996. A Public Choice Model of International Economic Cooperation and the Decline of the Nation State. Cardozo Law Review 18:925–56.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa. 1998. Contained Justice: The Politics Behind Europe's Rule of Law. Ph.D. diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa. Forthcoming. Europeanization and the Courts: Variable Patterns of Adoption Among National Judiciaries. In Europeanization and Domestic Structural Change, edited by Caporaso, James, Cowles, Maria Green, and Risse, Thomas. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
d'Etat, Conseil. 1992. Rapport Public.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas. 1992. Intellectual Property in International Trade Law and Policy: The GATT Connection. Aussenwirtschaft 1:79–105.Google Scholar
Covey, Russell Dean. 1996. Note: Adventures in the Zone of Twilight: Separation of Powers and National Economic Security in the Mexican Bailout. Yale Law Journal 105:1311–45.Google Scholar
Craig, P. P. 1998. Report on the United Kingdom: Constitutional Doctrine Within the United Kingdom: The Impact of the EC. In The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 195–224. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Croome, John. 1995. Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W. 1982. The Rules of the Game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dashwood, A., and Arnull, A.. 1984. English Courts and Article 177 of the EEC Treaty. Yearbook of European Law: 255–302.Google Scholar
Dashwood, Alan, and White, Robin. 1989. Enforcement Actions Under Articles 169 and 170 EEC. European Law Review 14(6):388–413.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. 1992. The Appointments Clause and International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A False Conflict. Washington and Lee Law Review 49:1315–28.Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno. 1984. Retour à «Costa» La primauté du droit communautaire à la lumière du droit international. Revue Trimestrielle du Droit Europèene 20:425–54.Google Scholar
DeBoe, David C. 1974. Secretary Stimson and the Kellogg-Briand Pact. In Essays on American Foreign Policy, edited by Morris, Margaret F. and Myres, Sandra L., 32–53. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud. 1998. The European Court of Justice. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Denters, Erik. 1996. Law and Policy of IMF Conditionality. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Destler, I. M. 1995. American Trade Politics. 3d ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Destler, I. M., and Odell, John. 1987. Anti-Protection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Politics. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Diebold, William Jr. 1952. The End of the ITO. Essays in International Finance, No. 16. Department of Economics and Social Institutions, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1993. Democracy and the Management of International Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (1):42–68.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard F. 1997. Japan in East Asia: Institutions and Regional Leadership. In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, 197–233. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1989. Universal Human Rights in Theory and in Practice. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Doremus, Paul. 1996. Externalization of Domestic Regulation: Intellectual Property Rights Reform in the Global Era. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3:341–74.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1995. Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379–406.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1998. Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. International Organization 52 (2):397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983a. Kant, Liberal Theories, and Foreign Affairs, Part 1. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(4):205–35.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983b. Kant, Liberal Theories, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):323–53.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review 80:1151–69.Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, Andrew Z. 1983. European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dursht, Kenneth A. 1997. From Containment to Cooperation: Collective Action and the Wassenaar Arrangement. Cardozo Law Review 19:1079–1123.Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard W. Jr, 1985. International Monetary Collaboration. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1992. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1999. Toward a New International Financial Architecture. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, ed. 1985. The Gold Standard in Theory and History. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eissa, Farouk Abu. 1998. Promotion of the Rule of Law in the Arab Region. American Bar Association World Order Under Law Reporter 5 (2):5.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel. 1963. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (4):643–69.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Social Norms and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4):99–117.Google Scholar
Evans, John. 1971. The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Everling, Ulrich. 1996. Will Europe Slip on Bananas? The Bananas Judgment of the European Court of Justice and National Courts. Common Market Law Review 33:401–37.Google Scholar
Farer, Tom J., ed. 1998. The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox. In The Inter-American System of Human Rïghts, edited by Harris, David and Livingstone, Stephen, 31–64. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fasseur, Cornelis. 1992. Colonial Dilemma: Van Vollenhoven and the Struggle Between Adat Law and Western Law in Indonesia. In European Expansion and Law, edited by Mommsen, Wolfgang J. and de Moor, Jaap A., 237–56. New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269–306.Google Scholar
Feldman, Mark B. 1986. Ted L. Stein on the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal—Scholarship Par Excellence. Washington Law Review 61 (3):997–1005.Google Scholar
Ferrell, Robert H. 1952. Peace in Their Time: The Origins of the Kellogg-Briand Pact. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger. 1981. Improving Compliance with International Law. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Barry, Gregory, Jeanne, and Szyszczak, Erika. 1993. Sex Equality Litigation in the Member States of the European Community: A Comparative Study. Brussels: Commission of the European Union DG V.Google Scholar
Fix-Fierro, Hector, and Lopez-Ayllon, Sergio. 1997. Communication Between Legal Cultures: The Case of NAFTA's Chapter 19 Binational Panels. Unpublished manuscript, Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Folsom, Ralph H. 1995. European Union Law in a Nutshell. 2d ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 1998. China in the ASEAN Regional Forum. Asian Survey 38 (5):425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. G. 1985. Notes on the Working of the Gold Standard Before 1914. In The Gold Standard in Theory and History, edited by Eichengreen, Barry, 141–65. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David. 1989. Human Rights and World Politics. 2d ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Forsythe, David. 1994. Politics and the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Criminal Law Forum 5:401–22.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1992. The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance. American Journal of International Law 86:46–91.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1995. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Jonathan T. 1994. Two Paradigms for the Rule of International Trade Law. Canada–U.S. Law Journal 20:39–56.Google Scholar
Fried, Jonathan T. 1998. APEC as the Asia-Pacific Model for Regional Cooperation. In China in the World Trade: Defining the Principles of Engagement, edited by Abbott, Frederick M., 183–88. Cambridge, Mass.: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization 45 (4):425–51.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Funabashi, Yoichi. 1995. Asia Pacific Fusion: Japan's Role in APEC. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Gal-Or, Noemi. 1998. Private Party Access: A Comparison of the NAFTA and EU Disciplines. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 21:1–41.Google Scholar
Gamble, John King Jr, 1985. The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as Soft Law. Houston Journal of International Law 8:37–47.Google Scholar
Garofano, John. 1999. Flexibility or Irrelevance: Ways Forward for the ARF. Contemporary Southeast Asia 21 (1):74–94.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market. International Organization 46 (2):533–60.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49 (1):171–81.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Weingast, Barry. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the EC's Internal Market. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 173–206. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner. 1998. The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 52 (1):149–76.Google Scholar
Genevois, Bruno. 1989. Note. Revue français du Droit administratif 5 (5):824–33.Google Scholar
Gesser, Avi. 1998. Why NAFTA Violates the Canadian Constitution. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 27:121–50.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Charles. 1991. Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Glick, Leslie A. 1984. Multilateral Trade Negotiations: World Trade After the Tokyo Round. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1965. The International Monetary Fund and Private Business Transactions: Some Legal Effects of the Articles of Agreement. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1979. Legal and Institutional Aspects of the International Monetary System: Selected Essays. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1980. The Rule of Law in the International Monetary Fund. IMF Pamphlet Series, 32. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1983. Strengthening the Soft International Law of Exchange Arrangements. American Journal of International Law 77:443–89.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1984a. Public International Law in the International Monetary System. Southwestern Law Journal 38 (September):799–852.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1984b. Legal Models for the International Regulation of Exchange Rates. Michigan Law Review 82 (April/May):1533–54.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1988. Exchange Rates in international Law and Organization. Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Gold, Joseph. 1989. Article VIII, Section 2 (b) of the IMF Articles in Its International Setting. In Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance, edited by Horn, Norbert, 65–106. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1996. International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North American ‘Unfair’ Trade Laws. International Organization 50 (4):541–64.Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 1996. The Politics of Judicial Discretion: Rethinking the Interaction Between National Courts and the European Court of Justice. West European Politics 19 (2):360–85.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984. China's Entry into International Society. In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 171–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, John, Spar, Debra, and Yoffie, David. 1996. Foreign Direct Investment and the Demand for Protection in the United States. International Organization 50:565–91.Google Scholar
Green, Carl J. 1995. APEC and Trans-Pacific Dispute Management. Law and Policy in International Business 26 (3):719–34.Google Scholar
Gruchalla-Wesierski, Tadeusz. 1984. A Framework for Understanding Soft Law. McGill Law Journal 30:37–88.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1975. The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M., ed. 1992. Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1). Special issue.Google Scholar
Harding, Christopher. 1992. Who Goes to Court in Europe: An Analysis of Litigation Against the European Community. European Law Review 71(2):104–25.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. 1992. Toward a Theory of Access for the European Court of Justice. Yearbook of European Law 12:213–48.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. 1996. “Francovich” and the Problem of the Disobedient State. EU Working Paper RSC 96/62. Robert Shuman Centre, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Carol, and Rawlings, Richard. 1992. Pressure Through Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Stuart. 1999. The Regional Response in Asia-Pacific and its Global Implications. Paper presented at the conference After the Global Crises: What Next for Regionalism, Warwick University, September.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartley, Trevor. 1994. The Foundations of European Community Law. 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 1998. Adjudicating Copyright Claims Under the TRIPs Agreement: The Case for a European Human Rights Analogy. Harvard International Law Journal 39 (2):357–441.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication. Yale Law Journal 107 (2):273–391.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. 2d ed. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1996. Foreign Affairs and the United States Constitution. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, Neuman, Gerald L., Orentlicher, Diane F., and Leebron, David W.. 1999. Human Rights. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, Pugh, Richard Crawford, Schachter, Oscar, and Smit, Hans. 1993. International Law. 3d ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Hillman, Jimmye S. 1997. Nontariff Agricultural Barriers Revisited. In Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade, edited by Orden, David and Roberts, Donna, 1–32. Minneapolis, Minn.: International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.Google Scholar
Hoang, Anh Tuan. 1996. ASEAN Dispute Management: Implications for Vietnam and an Expanded ASEAN. Contemporary Southeast Asia 18 (1):61–80.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Michael. 1990. Debt Policies for an Evolving Crisis. In The Global Debt Crisis: Forecasting for the Future, edited by MacDonald, Scott B., Lindsay, Margie, and Crum, David L., 185–219. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. B. 1978. A Concise Legal History of South-East Asia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Norbert. 1985. The Crisis of International Lending and Legal Aspects of Crisis Management. In Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance, edited by Horn, Norbert. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Horsefield, John Keith, and de Vries, Margaret Garritsen. 1969. The International Monetary Fund, 1945–1965: Twenty Years of International Monetary Cooperation. 3 vol. Washington, D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1992. The Judicialization of GATT Dispute Settlement. In In Whose Interest? Due Process and Transparency in International Trade, edited by Hart, Michael M. and Steger, Debra P., 9–43. Ottowa, Ont.: The Centre for Trade Policy and Law.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, N.H.: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1999. The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8(1): 1–53.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Schott, Jeffrey J.. 1993. NAFTA: An Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch/Americas Watch. 1994. The Facts Speak for Themselves: The Preliminary Report on Disappearances of the National Commissioner for the Protection of Human Rights in Honduras. English trans, by Human Rights Watch/Americas and the Center for Justice and International Law. Washington, D.C. Human Rights Watch/Americas Watch.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1993. International Society and the Study of Regimes: A Reflective Approach. In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Rittberger, Volker, 49–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurtig, Mel 1992. The Betrayal of Canada. 2d ed. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 1978. Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Uruguay. OEA/Ser.L/Z/II.43. Washington, D.C: OAS.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 1979. Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 1978. OEA/Ser.L/V/II.47, Doc. 13, Rev. 1. Washington, D.C: OAS.Google Scholar
International Country Risk Guide. Database. Available at <http://prsgroup.com/.crg/icrg.html>..>Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. Exchange Arrangements and Restrictions. Washington, D.C: IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1974. Annual Report. Washington D.C: IMF.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 1989. The World Trading System. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 1992. The Status of International Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis. American Journal of International Law 86 (2):310–29.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 1997. Editorial Comment: The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding—Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation. American Journal of International Law 91: 60–64.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 1998. The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence. London: Royal Institute for International Affairs.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., and Davey, William J.. 1986. Legal Rules or Government Discretion—Which Rule Is Best? In Legal Problems of International Economic Relations, edited by Jackson, John H. and Davey, William J., 1220–41. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., Louis, Jean-Victor, and Matsushita, Mitsuo. 1984. Implementing the Tokyo Round: National Constitutions and International Economic Rules. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1995. Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data. Journal of Peace Research 32 (4):469–82.Google Scholar
James, Harold. 1995. The Historical Development of the Principle of Surveillance. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 42 (4):762–91.Google Scholar
Janow, Merit E. 1996/1997. Assessing APEC's Role in Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 17 (2–3):947–1013.Google Scholar
Jarmul, Holly Dawn. 1996. Effects of Decisions of Regional Human Rights Tribunals on National Courts. In International Law Decisions in National Courts, edited by Franck, Thomas M. and Fox, Gregory H., 247–84. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kevin R. 1994. Free Trade and Closed Borders: NAFTA and Mexican Immigration to the United States. University of California at Davis Law Review 27: 937–78.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1999. The Myth of the ASEAN Way? Explaining the Evolution of the ASEAN Regional Forum. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, edited by Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert O., and Wallander, Celeste A., 287–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Josling, Tim. 1999. The Agricultural Negotiations: An Overflowing Agenda. Paper prepared for the 24th Annual Economic Policy Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, “Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Issues for the Millennium Round,” St. Louis, 21–22 October.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1988. Organizing the Pacific. In Pacific-Asian Economic Policies and Regional Interdependence, edited by Scalapino, Robert A., Sato, Seizaburo, Wanandi, Jusuf, and Han, Sung-joo, 329–50. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., 1997. Introduction: Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, 1–46. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–86.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keech, William R. 1995. Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keesing, Donald B. 1998. Improving Trade Policy Reviews in the World Trade Organization. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Kegley, C. W. Jr,, and Raymond, Gregory. 1981. International Legal Norms and the Preservation of Peace, 1820–1964: Some Evidence and Bi-Variate Relationships. International Interactions 8 (3):171–87.Google Scholar
Kellermann, A. E., Levelt-Overmars, W. M., and Posser, F. H. M.. 1990. Primus Inter Pares: The European Court and National Courts: The Follow-up by National Courts of Preliminary Ruling ex. Art. 177 of the Treaty of Rome: A Report on the Situation in the Netherlands. European University Working Paper. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Kellman, Barry. 1998. Protection of Nuclear Materials. Paper prepared for meeting of American Society of Law Project on Compliance with Soft Law, 8–10 October, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F. 1984. Diplomacy in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89:1685–1778.Google Scholar
Kennish, Tim. 1995. NAFTA and Investment—A Canadian Perspective. In NAFTA and Investment, edited by Rubin, Seymour J. and Alexander, Dean C., 1–35. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization 40 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32:379–96.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1995. Contested Commitments and Commitment Pathways: United States Foreign Policy, 1783–1989. Paper presented at annual meeting of International Studies Association, 21–25 February, Chicago.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Martin, Lisa L.. 1999. Institutional Theory, Endogeneity, and Delegation. Working Paper Series 99–07. Cambridge, Mass.: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr, 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. Toward a Theory of Legalization. Paper presented at the Conference on International Law and Domestic Politics, 4–7 June, St. Helena, Calif.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Hoffmann, Stanley, eds. 1991. The New European Community: Decision-Making and Institutional Change. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Marie-Christine. 1986. Le Grand Cour d'Etat. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politique.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1997. Making Bricks Without Straw in the Asia Pacific? The Pacific Review 10 (2):289–300.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1998. ASEAN and the Southeast Asian Security Complex. In Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World, edited by Lake, David A. and Morgan, Patrick M., 318–42. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1986. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen, and Keefer, Philip. 1995. Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics 7 (3):207–27.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Knox, John H. 1999. Finding a Role for Supranational Adjudication in International Environmental Law: The Submissions Procedure of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Unpublished manuscript, Dickenson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University, Carlisle, Pa.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75:181–207.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 106:2598–2659.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1998. Bringing International Law Home. Houston Law Review 35 (3):623–82.Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliane. 1998. Report on Germany. In The European Courts and National Courts, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone-Sweet, Alec, and Weiler, J. H. H., 77–131. Cambridge, Mass.: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 1999. On the Duration and Renegotiation of International Agreements. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 1999. Letter to the Editors of the Symposium (Symposium on Method in International Law). American Journal of International Law 93:351–61.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of State. International Organization 40 (4):753–75.Google Scholar
Krause, Lawrence B. 1994. The Pacific Century: Myth or Reality? The 1994 Panglaykim Memorial Lecture, 29 September, Jakarta.Google Scholar
Krause, Lawrence B. 1997. The Progress to Date and Agenda for the Future: A Summary. In Whither APEC? The Progress to Date and Agenda for the Future, edited by Bergsten, C. Fred, 241–46. Washington, D. C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne. 1998. The WTO as an International Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lauren, Paul Gordon. 1998. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1995. Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism. International Organization 51 (1):31–63.Google Scholar
Leifer, Michael. 1989. ASEAN and the Security of Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leifer, Michael. 1996. The ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending ASEAN's Model of Regional Security. London: International Institute of Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1995. The Regulation of Social Meaning. University of Chicago Law Review 62 (3): 968–73.Google Scholar
Lev, Daniel S. 1972. Islamic Courts in Indonesia: A Study in the Political Bases of Legal Institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Werner. 1976. Law and Politics in the International Society. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., and Brower, Charles N., eds. 1994. International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Toward Judicalization and Uniformity? New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1991. Why Are Some International Agreements Informal? International Organization 45 (4):495–538.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence. International Organization 48 (4):595–632.Google Scholar
Long, Olivier. 1985. Law and Its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trading System. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Loschak, Daniele. 1972. Le role politique du judge administratif Français. Paris: Librarie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F. 1996. Agora: The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act, Congress, and Cuba: The Helms-Burton Act. American Journal of International Law 90: 419–34.Google Scholar
Luchaire, François. 1991. Le Conseil constitutionnel et la souveraineté nationale. Revue du droit public II:1449–1513.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David Halloran. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, Robert E., and Trice, Russell C.. 1998. NAFTA at Five and the Loewen Case: Is NAFTA the Blood Relative of Lady Justice or the Angel of Death for State Sovereignty? Translex 2:1–5.Google Scholar
Macdermot, Niall. 1981. Uruguay in the International Organizations for the Protection of Human Rights. Colloquium on the Policy of Institutionalization of the State of Exception and Its Rejection by the Uruguayan People. Geneva.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mancini, Federico, and Keeling, David. 1992. From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge Facing the European Court. Yearbook of European Law 11:1–13.Google Scholar
Maresca, John J. 1985. To Helsinki: The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe 1973–75. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Marreese, Michael. 1986. CMEA: Effective but Cumbersome Political Economy. International Organization 40 (2):287–328.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization 49 (1): 183–90.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1998a. The Role of National Courts in the Process of European Integration: Accounting for Judicial Preferences and Constraints. The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 77–131. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1998b. Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1):177–209.Google Scholar
Maupain, Francis. 1998. Compliance with International Human Rights Soft Law: The Case of International Labour Recommendations and Similar Instruments. Paper prepared for meeting of American Society of International Law Project on Compliance with Soft Law, 8–10 October, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Mayer, Wolfgang. 1984. Endogenous Tariff Formation. American Economic Review 74:970–85.Google Scholar
Mazey, Sonia. 1998. The European Union and Women's Rights: From the Europeanization of National Agendas to the Nationalization of a European Agenda? Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1): 131–52.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P. 1996. The WTO and Developing Asian Economies: Special Provisions for Dispute Resolution and Emerging Paradigms Within APEC. In The Asia-Pacific Region and the Expanding Borders of the WTO: Implications, Challenges, and Opportunities, edited by Buchanan, Mark A., 94–107. Victoria, B.C.: Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy J. 1984. Firms and Tariff Regime Change: Explaining the Demand for Protection. World Politics 36:215–33.Google Scholar
Medina Quiroga, Cecilia. 1990. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Reflections on a Joint Venture. Human Rights Quarterly 12 (4): 439–64.Google Scholar
Meier, Gert. 1994. Der Streit um die Umsatzausgleichsteuer aus integrationspolitischer Sicht. Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 3/94.Google Scholar
Mekouar, Mohamed Ali. 1998. FAO/UNEP Non-Legally-Binding Instruments on Pesticides and Chemicals: The Requirement of Prior Informed Consent. Draft paper prepared for meeting of American Society of International Law Project on Compliance with Soft Law, 8–10 October, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Mendez, Juan E., and Vivanco, Jose Miguel. 1990. Disappearances and the Inter-American Court: Reflections on a Litigation Experience. Hamline Law Review 13: 507–77.Google Scholar
Mignone, Emilio F. 1991. Derechos Humanos y Sociedad: El Caso Argentino. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales y Ediciones del Pensamiento Nacional.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance. International Organization 48 (3):425–58.Google Scholar
Morales, Isidro. 1997. Confidence Building and Dispute Resolution under NAFTA. Assessing the Impact of Trade Regimes in the Deepening of Integration. Unpublished manuscript, University of the Americas, Puebla.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations 1 (2): 157–89.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origin of International Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2): 217–52.Google Scholar
Morris, Virginia, and Scharf, Michael P.. 1995. An Insider's Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Documentary History and Analysis. Irvington-on-Hudson, U.K.: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Morris, Virginia, and Scharf, Michael P.. 1998. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Irvington-on-Hudson, U.K.: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information. International Organization 48 (3):387–423.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1997. The Laws of War as an International Institution. Paper presented at Program on International Politics, Economics, and Security, February, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1998. The Institutional Features of the Prisoner of War Treaties. Paper presented at the Conference on Rational International Institutions, April, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Sujoy. 1998. Ambiguity Aversion and the Incompleteness of Contractual Form. American Economic Review 88 (5):1207–31.Google Scholar
Nadal, Alejandro. 1997. Mexico: Open Economy, Closed Options: The Making of a Vulnerable Economy. In Joining Together, Standing Apart: National Identities After NAFTA, edited by Dallmeyer, Dorinda G., 35–62. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Noyes, John E. 1998. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Cornell International Law Review 32:109–82.Google Scholar
Ostry, Sylvia. 1998. APEC and Regime Creation in the Asia-Pacific: The OECD Model? In Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles E., 317–50. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Palmer, David Scott. 1996. Collectively Defending Democracy in the Western Hemisphere. In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas, edited by Farer, Tom. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Geoffrey. 1992. New Ways to Make International Environmental Law. American Journal of International Law 86:259–83.Google Scholar
Pan, Eric J. 1999. Assessing the NAFTA Chapter 19 Binational Panel System: An Experiment in International Adjudication. Harvard International Law Journal 40 (2):379–449.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain. 1998. The Conseil Constitutionnel, la souveraineté et les traités. Cahier de Conseil Constitutionnel 4 (second semester).Google Scholar
Pescatore, Pierre. 1981. Les Travaux du <Groupe Juridique> Dans la négociation des Traités de Rome. Studia Diplomatica (Chronique de Politique Etrangère) 34 (1–4): 159–78.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1991. Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, and Hilf, Meinhard, eds. 1988. The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Petri, Peter A. 1997. Measuring and Comparing Progress in APEC. In Whither APEC? The Progress to Date and Agenda for the Future, edited by Bergsten, C. Fred, 41–59. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Philip, George. 1985. Mexico: Learning to Live with the Crisis. In Latin America and the World Recession, edited by Durán, Esperanza, 81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Picker, Randal. 1997. Simple Games in a Complex World: A Generative Approach to the Adoption of Norms. University of Chicago Law Review 64:1225–88.Google Scholar
Plötner, Jens. 1998. Report on France: The Reception of the Direct Effect and Supremacy Doctrine by the French Supreme Courts. In The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 41–75. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Plummer, Michael G. 1998. ASEAN and Institutional Nesting in the Asia-Pacific: Leading from Behind in APEC. In Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles E., 279–316. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51: (1):99–134.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Uriarte, Ramos, Luis, Jorge. 1995. Foreign Investment in Mexico Under NAḞTA. In NAFTA and Investment, edited by Rubin, Seymour J. and Alexander, Dean C., 85–110. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1997. Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte. 1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. 2000. Does International Law Matter in Preventing Ethnic Conflict? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32:591–698.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., and Abrams, Jason S.. 1997. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 1996. International Enforcement of Enforcement Under the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (3):721–63.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 1997. The Participatory Revolution in International Environmental Law. Harvard Environmental Law Review 21:537–86.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 1995. Economic Cooperation in Southeast Asia: Changing Incentives. Asian Survey 25 (9):850–66.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 1998. Australia and APEC. In Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles E., 143–64. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gregory. 1994. Democracies. Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (1):24–42.Google Scholar
Reich, Norbert. 1996. Judge-Made “Europe a la carte”: Some Remarks on Recent Conflicts Between European and German Constitutional Law Provoked by the Banana Litigation. European Journal of International Law 7:103–11.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Eric. 1995. Efficiency and Distribution in GATT Dispute Outcomes: A Statistical Study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 31 August–3 September.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael. 1988. Remarks. Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 82:373–377.Google Scholar
Richards, John E. 1999. Toward a Positive Theory of International Institutions: Regulating International Aviation Markets. International Organization 53 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan A. 1974. Legal Systems of Regional Economic Integration. American Journal of Comparative Law 22:415–43.Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan A., and Abbott, Frederick M.. 1994a. Foreword. In Parliamentary Participation in the Making and Operation of Treaties: A Comparative Study, edited by Riesenfeld, Stefan A. and Abbott, Frederick M., 1–18. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan A., and Abbott, Frederick M.. 1994b. The Scope of U.S. Senate Control over the Conclusion and Operation of Treaties. In Parliamentary Participation in the Making and Operation of Treaties, edited by Riesenfeld, Stefan A. and Abbott, Frederick M., 261–327. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1995a. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995b. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. H. 1966. European Institutions—Cooperation: Integration: Unification. 2d ed. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Rock, David. 1989. Argentina 1516–1987: From Spanish Colonization to Alfonsin. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Roessler, Friederich, Schwartz, Warren F., and Sykes, Alan. 1997. Understanding Dispute Resolution in the WTO/GATT System. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare. 1999. The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4):709–51.Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai. 1995. The World Court: What It Is and How It Works. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, Mackenzie, Ruth, and Shany, Yuval, eds. 1999. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sauvy, Alfred. 1967. Histoire Économique de la France entre les Deux Guerres. Vol. 2. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Scammell, W. M. 1985. The Working of the Gold Standard. In The Gold Standard in Theory and History, edited by Eichengreen, Barry, 103–19. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar. 1977. The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements. American Journal of International Law 71:296–304.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar. 1991. International Law in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1935. Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, and Wise, Virginia J.. 1997. Legal Positivism as Legal Information. Cornell Law Review 82 (5):1080–1110.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. 1998. The Mobilisation of European Community Law. In Soziologie des Rechts, edited by Brand, J. and Strempel, D., 443–56. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Thomas. 1998. APEC and Dispute Settlement. In China in the World Trade: Defining the Principles of Engagement, edited by Abbott, Frederick M., 189–96. Cambridge, Mass.: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Schoultz, Lars. 1981. Human Rights and United States Policy Toward Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, Donald E., and Schulz, Deborah Sundloff. 1994. The United States, Honduras, and the Crisis in Central America. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jürgen. 1988. Die Befolgung von Vorabentscheidungen des Europäischen Gerichtshofs durch deutsche Gerichte. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M. 1996. The Performance and Prospects of the International Court of Justice. In Perspectives of Air Law, Space Law, and International Business Law for the Next Century, edited by Bockstiegel, Karl-Heinz, 291–98. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.Google Scholar
Secchi, Carlo 1997. The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round: Groups, Strategies, Interests, and Results. In Multilateralism and Regionalism After the Uruguay Round, edited by Faini, R. and Grilli, E., 61–111. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Seidel, Martin. 1987. Article 177 EEC: Experiences and Problems—Germany as a Member State. In Asser Institute Colloquium on European Law Session XV, edited by Schermers, H., Timmermans, C., Kellermann, A., and Stewart, W. J, 239–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Servicio Paz y Justicia Uruguay. 1992. Uruguay Nunca Más: Human Rights Violations 1972–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Setear, Johm K. 1999. Whaling and Legalization. Unpublished manuscript. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Sevilla, Christina R. 1997. A Political Economy Model of GATT/WTO Trade Complaints. Jean Monnet Working Paper 5/97. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Law School.Google Scholar
Sevilla, Christina R. 1998. The Politics of Enforcing GATT and WTO Rules. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jo. 1998. Constitutional Settlements and the Citizen After the Treaty of Amsterdam. Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/98. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Law School.Google Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. 1994. The World Bank Inspection Panel. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
Shonfield, Andrew. 1976. Politics and Trade. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 47 (3):411–42.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1996. The Emergence, Evolution, and Effectiveness of the Latin American Human Rights Network. In Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship, and Society in Latin America, edited by Jelin, Elizabeth and Hershberg, Eric, 59–84. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1997. Reconceptualizing Sovereignty in the Americas: Historical Precursors and Current Practices. Houston Journal of International Law 19 (3):705–29.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, and Paulus, Andreas L.. 1999. The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View. The American Journal of International Law 93:302–16.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1993. Why Innovate? Founding the Bank for International Settlements, 1929–30. World Politics. 45 (3):361–405.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1994. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy During the Interwar Years. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1997. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Law and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 28 August.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1998. Compliance with International Agreements. In Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 1, edited by Polsby, Nelson W., 75–94. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000a. Soft Law Compliance: The Case of Money Laundering. In Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System, edited by Shelton, Dinah. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000b. Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Simon, Jose Luis. 1990. La Dictadura de Stroessner y Los Derechos Humanos. Asuncion, Paraguay: Comite de Iglesias.Google Scholar
Skiles, Marilyn E. 1991. Stabilization and Financial Sector Reform in Mexico. Research Paper No. 9125. New York: Federal Reserve Bank.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995a. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6:503–38.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995b. The Liberal Agenda for Peace: International Relations Theory and the Future of the United Nations. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 4:377–419.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997a. Busting Out All Over: The Proliferation of Actors in the International System. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the Conference on New Challenges for the Rule of Law: Lawyers, Internationalization, and the Social Construction of Legal Rules, 7–9 November, Santa Barbara, Calif.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997b. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs 76 (5): 183–97.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. Governing the Global Economy Through Government Networks. In The Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael, 177–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, Joseph H. H., eds. 1998. The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, James McCall. 2000. The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts. International Organization 54 (1): 137–80.Google Scholar
Soesastro, Hadi. 1994. The Institutional Framework for APEC: An ASEAN Perspective. In APEC: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by Yue, Chia Siow, 38–53. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Eric. 1981. Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. American Journal of International Law 75:1–27.Google Scholar
Stewart, Terence, ed. 1993–1999. I–IV GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History 1986–1994. Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1998. Constitutional Dialogues in the European Community. In The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 305–30. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1999. Judicialization and the Construction of Governance. Comparative Political Studies 32 (2): 147–84.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas. 1998a. The European Court and the National Courts: A Statistical Analysis of Preliminary References, 1961–95. Journal of Public European Policy 5 (1):66–97.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas. 1998b. Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community. American Political Science Review 92 (1):63–80.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra. 1995. Is Democratic Supranationalism a Danger? In Nationalism and Nationalities in the New Europe, edited by Kupchan, C., 66–84. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1986. Legal Interference with Private Preferences. University of Chicago Law Review 53:1129–74.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O. 1991. Protectionism as a “Safeguard”: A Positive Analysis of the GATT “Escape Clause” with Normative Speculations. University of Chicago Law Review 58:255–305.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O. 1992. Constructive Unilateral Threats in International Commercial Relations: The Limited Case for Section 301. Law and Policy in International Business 23 (2/3):263–330.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 1999. Making States Comply: The European Commission, the European Court of Justice, and the Enforcement of the Internal Market. Ph.D. diss., Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1987. Juridification—Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust, and Social Welfare Law, edited by Teubner, Gunther, 3–48. New York: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Thambipillai, Pushpa, and Saravanamuttu, Johan. 1985. ASEAN Negotiations: Two Insights. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Touffait, Adolphe. 1975. Les jurisdictions judiciares françaises devant l'interprétation et l'application du droit communautaire. In La France et les Communautés Européenes, edited by Rideau, J., Gerbet, P., Torrelli, M., and Chevallier, R. M.. Paris: Librairie Générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Trimble, Philip. 1985. International Trade and the “Rule of Law.” Michigan Law Review 83 (February): 1016–32.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1994. The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda-Setter. American Political Science Review 88 (1): 128–42.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Garrett, Geoffrey. n.d. The Institutional Determinants of Supranationalism in the European Union. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Congressional Research Service. 1979. Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Assistance: Experiences and Issues in Policy Implementation (1977–1978). Report Prepared for U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1998. Honduras Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997. Available at <www.global/human_rights/1997_hrp_report/honduras.html>..>Google Scholar
U.S. Executive Branch. 1997. Study on the Operation and Effect of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Available at <www.ustreas.gov>..>Google Scholar
United Nations. 1991. Commission on Human Rights. Report of the United Nations Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. New York: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1992–1999. Reports of the Special Rapporteur on Torture, Sir Nigel Rodley. New York: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1998. Report of the United Nations Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. New York: UN.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. 1987. Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Urata, Shujiro. 1998. Foreign Direct Investment and APEC. In Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles E.. 87–188. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Vaky, Viron, and Munoz, Heraldo. 1993. The Future of the Organization of American States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Vedel, Georges. 1987. L'attitude des jurisdictions françaises envers les traités européens. Working Paper. Saarbrücken: Europa-Institut der Universität des Saarlands.Google Scholar
Verdier, Daniel. 1994. Democracy and International Trade: Britain, France, and the United Stales, 1860–1990. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Victor, David G. 1998. The Operation and Effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol's Non-compliance Procedure. In The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments, edited by Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B., 137–76. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Victor, David G., Raustalia, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B.. 1998. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weatherhill, Steven. 1997. Reflections on EC Law's Implementation Imbalance in Light of the Ruling in Heley Lomas. In Law and Diffuse Interests in the European Legal Order, edited by Kramer, Ludwig, Micklitz, Hans W., and Tonner, Klaus, 31–53. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper. 1972. Preface. In Le role politique du judge administratif Français, edited by Lorschak, Daniele. Paris: Librarie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper. 1983. Towards Relative Normativity in International Law? American Journal of International Law 77:413–42.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1991. The Transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal 100:2403–83.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1994. A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4):510–34.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1995. The State Über Alles: Demos, Telos, and the German Maastricht Decision. European University Institute Working Paper. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1998. Epilogue: The European Courts of Justice: Beyond Doctrine or the Legitimacy Crisis of European Constitutionalism. In The European Court and National Courts—Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, J. H. H., 365–91. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1999. The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? And Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude E. Jr, 1992. The African Commission on Human and People's Rights: A Five-Year Report and Assessment. Human Rights Quarterly 14:43–57.Google Scholar
Wesley, Michael. 1999. The Asian Crisis and the Adequacy of Regional Institutions. Contemporary South-east Asia 21 (1):54–73.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1990. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1989. Transaction Cost Economics. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, edited by Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D., 135–182. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wils, G. 1993. Prejudiciële vragen van Belgische rechters en hun gevolgen. Pradvies. Belgium: Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert. 1986. International Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert. 1998. NAFTA Chapter 19 and the Development of International Administrative Law—Applications in Antidumping and Competition Law. Journal of World Trade 32 (1):65–84.Google Scholar
Wirth, David A. 1994. Reexamining Decision-Making Processes in International Environmental Law. Iowa Law Review 79:769–802.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1995. World Data. CD-ROM, STARS retrieval system. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1998. World Development Indicators database. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 1995. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
Yamakage, Susumu. 1997. Japan's National Security and Asia-Pacific's Regional Institutions in the Post-Cold War Era. In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, 275–305. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yamazawa, Ippei. 1992. On Pacific Economic Integration. Economic Journal 102 (November):1519–29.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth, and Yarbrough, Robert M.. 1992. Cooperation and Governance in International Trade: The Strategic Organizational Approach. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1979. Compliance with Public Authority. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1989. The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment. International Organization 43 (3):349–75.Google Scholar
Zaring, David. 1998. International Law by Other Means: The Twilight Existence of International Financial Regulatory Organizations. Texas International Law Journal 33:218–330.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yunling. 1998. China and APEC. In Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles E., 213–34. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Zoller, Elisabeth. 1992. Droit des relations extérieures. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris.Google Scholar
Zuleeg, Manfred. 1993. Bundesfinanzhof und Gemeinschaftsrecht. In 75 Jahre Reichsfinanzhof-Bundesfinanzhof, edited by Bundesfinanzhof, Prasident der, 115–30. Bonn: Stollfuß Verlag.Google Scholar