Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T11:03:22.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Risking Peace: Do Hawks or Doves Deliver the Olive Branch?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2005

Kenneth A. Schultz
Kenneth A. Schultz
Affiliation:
Kenneth A. Schultz is Associate Professor of Political Science at Stanford University, Stanford, California. He can be reached at [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

This article explores the politics of risking international cooperation with a distrusted adversary. It develops a model in which two states attempt to learn over the course of two periods whether or not mutual cooperation is possible given their (initially unknown) preferences. In one of the states, the government is engaged in domestic political competition with an opposition party. One party is known to have more hawkish preferences than the other, on average, and voters must decide which party to elect after observing the international interaction in the first period. The model shows that, when trust is low but continued conflict is costly, cooperation is most likely to be initiated by a moderate hawk—a leader with moderate preferences from the more hawkish party. Moreover, while dovish leaders are better at eliciting cooperation in the short run, mutual cooperation is most likely to endure if it was initiated by a hawk. Some empirical implications and illustrations of the model are discussed.I gratefully acknowledge thoughtful comments received from Andrew Kydd, James Morrow, Brett Ashley Leeds, T. Clifton Morgan, Kenneth Scheve, Deborah Larson, Bruce Russett, Alex Mintz, and the anonymous reviewers. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the International Studies Association, March 2002.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Alvarez, Robert. 2003. North Korea: No Bygones at Yongbyon. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 59 (4):38–45.Google Scholar
Arian, Asher. 1995. Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arian, Asher. 2002. A Further Turn to the Right: Israeli Public Opinion on National Security. Strategic Assessment 5 (1). Available at <http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/sa/v5n1p4Ari.html>. Accessed 15 September 2004.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Tony. 1993. Breaking the Ice: Rapprochement Between East and West Germany, the United States and China, and Israel and Egypt. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Barlow, Ima Christina. 1971. The Agadir Crisis. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.
Bennett, D. Scott. 1998. Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry Termination. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1200–32.Google Scholar
Binion, Rudolph. 1960. Defeated Leaders: The Political Fate of Caillaux, Jouvenel, and Tardieu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Borker, Susan, Louis Kriesberg, and Abu Abdul-Quader. 1985. Conciliation, Confrontation, and Approval of the President. Peace and Change 1 (1):31–48.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Calvert, Randall C. 1985. The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice. Journal of Politics 47 (2):530–55.Google Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Ajin Choi. 2003. Guess Who Did What: Political Leaders and the Management of Territorial Disputes, 1950–1990. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (3):251–78.Google Scholar
Colaresi, Michael. 2004. When Doves Cry: International Rivalry, Unreciprocated Cooperation, and Leadership Turnover. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3):555–70.Google Scholar
Cortright, David, and Amitabh Mattoo. 1996. India and the Bomb: Public Opinion and Nuclear Options. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Coufoudakis, Van. 1985. Greek-Turkish Relations, 1973–1983: The View from Athens. International Security 9 (4):185–217.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tyler, and Daniel Sutter. 1998. Why Only Nixon Could Go to China. Public Choice 97 (4):605–15.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cukierman, Alex, and Mariano Tommasi. 1998. When Does It Take a Nixon to Go to China? American Economic Review 88 (1):180–197.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2003. Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace. International Organization 57 (2):337–72.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Melvin A. 1983. Sadat and Begin: The Domestic Politics of Peacemaking. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. 1999. Elections and War: The Electoral Incentive in the Democratic Politics of War and Peace. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Gelpi, Christopher. 2003. The Power of Legitimacy: Assessing the Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Goertz, Gary, and Paul F. Diehl. 1993. Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns. International Studies Quarterly 37 (2):147–71.Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R. 1994. The Haldeman Diaries: Inside the Nixon White House. New York: Putnam.
Huth, Paul K., and Todd L. Allee. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iklé, Fred Charles. 1971. Every War Must End. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation. International Organization 54 (2):325–57.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. Forthcoming. Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Larson, Deborah. 1997. Anatomy of Mistrust: U.S.-Soviet Relations during the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Maoz, Zeev, and Ben D. Mor. 2002. Bound by Struggle: The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mavrogordatos, George T. 1983. Stillborn Republic: Social Coalitions and Party Strategies in Greece, 1922–1936. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mor, Ben D. 1997. Peace Initiatives and Public Opinion: The Domestic Context of Conflict Resolution. Journal of Peace Research 34 (2):197–215.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Neilson, Keith. 1995. Britain and the Last Tsar: British Policy and Russia, 1894–1917. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nincic, Miroslav. 1988. The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Politics of Opposites. World Politics 40 (4):452–75.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in America's Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Papayoanou, Paul A. 1997. Economic Interdependence and the Balance of Power. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):113–40.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Jon Hurwitz. 1992. International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs: Public Response to Changing Soviet-U.S. Relations. American Journal of Political Science 36 (2):431–61.Google Scholar
Pentzopoulos, Dimitri. 1962. The Balkan Exchange of Minorities and Its Impact upon Greece. Paris: Mouton & Co.
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1991. Linkage Politics Theory and the Greek-Turkish Rapprochement. In The Greek-Turkish Conflict in the 1990s, edited by Dimitri Constas, 73–88. London: MacMillan.
Psomiades, Harry. 1962. Greek-Turkish Relations, 1923–30: A Study in the Politics of Rapprochement. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York.
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–61.Google Scholar
Quandt, William B. 1986. Camp David: Peacemaking and Politics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Roberts, Samuel J. 1990. Party and Policy in Israel: The Battle between Hawks and Doves. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Rock, Stephen R. 1989. Why Peace Breaks Out: Great Power Rapprochement in Historical Perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2004. Could Humphrey Have Gone to China? Measuring the Political Costs and Benefits of Making Peace. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigal, Leon V. 1998. Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Slantchev, Branislav. 2003. The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations. American Political Science Review 97 (4):621–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair, and Allan Stam. 2003. Bargaining and the Nature of War. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2000. Bargaining and War. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):469–84.Google Scholar
Ward, Hugh. 1989. Testing the Waters: Taking Risks to Gain Reassurance in Public Goods Games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33 (2):274–308.Google Scholar
Weinroth, Howard S. 1970. The British Radicals and the Balance of Power, 1902–1914. The Historical Journal 13 (4):653–82.Google Scholar
Werner, Suzanne. 1999. The Precarious Nature of Peace: Resolving the Issues, Enforcing the Settlement, and Renegotiating the Terms. American Journal of Political Science 43 (3):912–34.Google Scholar
Zartman, William I. 1989. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.