Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T09:41:55.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nuclear power safety and the role of international organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Jack Barkenbus
Jack Barkenbus
Affiliation:
Political scientist with the Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, at Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Get access

Abstract

Sovereign states determine the health and safety regulation of nuclear power facilities almost exclusively. Yet the Soviet nuclear power accident at Chernobyl (April 1986) demonstrated that nuclear power can have significant health and political effects transcending state boundaries. Several meetings have been held at the headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) since the Chernobyl accident, with delegates seeking to find the proper balance between autonomous state decision-making and international or transboundary interests. This article examines the nuclear safety role of IAEA in the past, and comes to conclusions regarding its likely role in the future. I claim that IAEA is unlikely to become a powerful regulatory “watchdog,” but that incremental changes in the agency could, over time, create a significant international presence.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , Summer 1987 , pp. 475 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Congressional Research Service, Nuclear Safeguards: A Reader, a report prepared for the House Subcommittee on Energy Research and Production, 98th Congress, 1st sess., 12 1983, pp. 46–56Google Scholar.

2. Scheinman, Lawrence, “Nonproliferation Regime: Safeguards, Controls, and Sanctions,” in Weinberg, Alvin M., Alonso, Marcelo and Barkenbus, Jack N., eds., The Nuclear Connection (New York: Paragon House Publishers, 1985), pp. 177–210Google Scholar; Fischer, David and Szasz, Paul, Safeguarding the Atom: A Critical Appraisal (London: Taylor & Francis, 1985)Google Scholar; Scheinman, Lawrence, The Nonproliferation Role of the International Atomic Energy Agency: A Critical Assessment (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1985)Google Scholar.

3. Scheinman, Lawrence, “Security and a Transnational System: The Case of Nuclear Energy,” International Organization 25 (Summer 1971), pp. 626–49Google Scholar.

4. Herrington, John in The Energy Report (newsletter), 9 09 1986, p. 722Google Scholar.

5. Atomic Industrial Forum, INFO (newsletter), 06 1986, p. 4Google Scholar.

6. Graham, John, “The Graham Thesis” Nuclear News, 29 09 1986, p. 37Google Scholar.

7. European Energy Report (newsletter), 3 October 1986, pp. 3–4.

8. Fischer, David A. V., “The International Response,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 43 (08/09 1986), p. 47Google Scholar.

9. The Economist, 6 September 1986, p. 45.

10. World Environment Report (newsletter), 5 May 1980, p. 4; Nucleonics Week (newsletter), 12 June 1980, p. 1.

11. The New York Times, 1 September 1980, p. 35.

12. “Austrians Fume over Wackersdorf,” Nuclear Engineering International, 31 September 1986, p. 12.

13. Nucleonics Week (newsletter), 22 May 1986, pp. 10–11.

14. The New York Times, 4 January 1987, p. 6.

15. Rosen, Morris, “The Critical Issue of Nuclear Power Plant Safety in Developing Countries,” IAEA Bulletin, 19 04 1977, pp. 12–21Google Scholar; “Do We Need a New International Safety Body?” Nuclear Engineering International, 30 March 1985, pp. 19–21.

16. Barkenbus, Jack N., Prospects and Opportunities for Nuclear Power Regulatory Reform, Institute for Energy Analysis Research Memorandum (Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 04 1983), pp. 23–30Google Scholar.

17. Nucleonics Week (newsletter), 22 May 1986, p. 11.

18. Nuclear News, 29 September 1986, p. 75.

19. Nucleonics Week (newsletter), 11 May 1986, p. 11.

20. Nucleonics Week (newsletter), 4 September 1986.

21. World Resources Institute, Improving Environmental Cooperation, a report of a Panel of Business Leaders and Other Experts Convened by the World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., 1984, p. 42Google Scholar.

22. Jacobson, Harold K., “Technological Developments, Organizational Capabilities, and Values”, International Organization 25 (Autumn 1971), p. 778Google Scholar.

23. There are regional organizations active in nuclear safety issues, notably: the Nuclear Energy Agency of OECD; EURATOM, which comes under the European Economic Community; and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance which serves Eastern European nations and the Soviet Union. These organizations will not be discussed in this article.

24. Lawrence Scheinman, The Nonproliferation Role; Kapur, Ashok, “Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Security: Views from the South,” in Boardman, Robert and Kelley, James F., eds., Nuclear Exports and World Politics (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983), pp. 163–93Google Scholar.

25. Personal communication from David Fischer, 5 December 1983.

26. Skolnikoff, Eugene B., The International Imperatives of Technology (Berkeley: Berkeley Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1972)Google Scholar.

27. Stadie, K. B., “Sharing Safety Experience,” in IAEA, Current Nuclear Power Plant Safety Issues, vol. 1 (Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1981), p. 435Google Scholar.

28. Nuclear News (newsletter), January 1983, p. 14.

29. Nuclear Engineering International, 30 March 1985, pp. 19–21.

30. The Energy Daily (newsletter), 12 September 1986, p. 3.

31. Zebroski, Edwin, “The Dynamics of Institutional Changes Following the TMI Accident,” in Williams, M. R. and McCormick, N. J., eds., Progress in Nuclear Energy 10 (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982), pp. 249–58Google Scholar.

32. Lelan, Sillin et al. , Leadership in Achieving Operational Excellence: The Challenge for All Nuclear Utilities (report to the U.S. Nuclear Utility Industry), 08 1986Google Scholar.

33. Inside N.R.C. (newsletter), 3 February 1986, pp. 8–9.

34. Inside N.R.C. (newsletter), 29 September 1986, pp. 2–3.

35. Washington Post, 7 May 1986, p. A34.

36. Duchacek, Ivo D., The Territorial Dimensions of Politics: Within, Among and Across Nations (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986)Google Scholar.