Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:28:20.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2004

Mark Zachary Taylor
Mark Zachary Taylor
Affiliation:
Mark Zachary Taylor is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. He can be reached at [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

How can one explain cross-national differences in innovative activity across the industrialized democracies? In this article, I examine the “varieties of capitalism” (VOC) response to this question. VOC theory predicts that societies with liberal-market economies will direct their inventive activity toward radical technological change, while societies with coordinated-market economies will direct their inventive activity toward incremental technological change. I find that these predictions are not supported by the empirical data, and that the evidence offered by VOC proponents depends heavily on the inclusion of a major outlier, the United States, in the class of liberal-market economies. My empirical investigation includes simple patent counts, patents weighted by forward citations, and scholarly publications (both simple counts and citations-weighted). I analyze data covering all of the VOC countries over the course of several decades, little of which reveals the innovative patterns predicted by VOC scholars.For their excellent insights, critiques, and encouragement I gratefully thank Thomas Cusack, Tracy Gabridge, Michael Brewster Hawes, Derek Hill, Daniel K. Johnson, Chappel Lawson, Mark Lewis, Benedicta Marzinotto, Andrew Miller, Michael Piore, Jonathan Rodden, Herman Schwartz, James Snyder, David Soskice, Edward Steinfeld, Scott Stern, Dan Winship, the editors at International Organization, and two anonymous reviewers.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 601 - 631
Copyright
© 2004 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibugi, Daniel, and Mario Pianta. 1996. Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys. Technovation 16 (9):451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by Richard R. Nelson, 609–26. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Bauer, Martin, ed. 1995. Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beasley, David. 1988. The Suppression of the Automobile: Skulduggery at the Crossroads. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bimber, Bruce. 1994. Three Faces of Technological Determinism. In Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by Merrit Roe Smith and Leo Marx, 79–100. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bourke, Paul, and Linda Butler. 1996. Publication Types, Citation Rates, and Evaluation. Scientometrics 37 (3):473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 1999. International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement. International Economic Review 40 (3):537–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edquist, Charles, ed. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. New York: Pinter.
Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Garfield, Eugene. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Glanzel, Wolfgang, and Henk F. Moed. 2002. Journal Impact Measures in Bibiliometric Research. Scientometrics 53 (2):171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, ed. 1984. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Griliches, Zvi. 1990. Patents Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4):1661–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, Bronwyn H. Hall, and Ariel Pakes. 1987. The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity. In Economic Policy and Technological Performance, edited by Partha Dasgupta and Paul Stoneman, 68–103. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2000. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. Working Paper 7741. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Working Paper 8498. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. Introduction. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 1–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harhoff, Dietmar, Francis Narin, F. M. Scherer, and Katrin Vopel. 1999. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventories. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3):511–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan. 1984. Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets, and Trade Theory. In Handbook of International Economics, edited by Ronald Jones and Peter Kenen, 325–65. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Hicks, Dana. 1999. The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences. Scientometrics 44 (2):193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Manuel Trajtenberg, and Michael Fogarty. 2000. The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve Survey of Patentees. Working Paper 7631. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Krugman, Paul, ed. 1986. Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lanjouw, Jean O., and Mark Schankerman. 1997. Stylized Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope, and Ownership. Working Paper 6297. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lanjouw, Jean O., and Mark Schankerman. 1999. The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. Working Paper 7345. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lundvall, Bengt-Ake, ed. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
McMillan, G. Steven, and Robert D. Hamilton. 2000. Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12 (4):465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mowery, David C., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1979. The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy 8 (2):102–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Economic Research. 2001. The NBER U.S. Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Available at 〈www.nber.org/patents〉. Accessed on 24 March 2004.
National Science Board. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators–2002. Washington, D.C.: National Science Board.
Nelson, Richard R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pakes, Ariel. 1986. Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks. Econometrica 54 (4):755–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5):S71–102.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan, and L. E. Birdzell_Jr. 1986. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York: Basic Books.
Samuels, Richard J. 1994. “Rich Nation, Strong Army”: National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Saxenian, Anna-Lee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Scherer, Frederic M. 1965. Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Innovations. American Economic Review 55 (5):1097–125.Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Solow, Robert M. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (3):312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1):172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1993. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflicts in High-Technology Industries. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Utterback, James M. 1994. Mastering The Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.