Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:51:48.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce—The EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Arrangement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2003

Henry Farrell
Get access

Abstract

Much recent international relations scholarship has argued that states are unable to control e-commerce, so that private actors are coming to play a dominant role. However, this body of literature fails to account for emerging “hybrid institutions,” in which states create general frameworks of rules, which are then implemented by private actors. This article examines a prominent example of such an institution, the EU-U.S. Safe Harbor arrangement in the field of privacy, and sets out an alternative explanation of state–private actor relations in the sphere of e-commerce. It shows how Safe Harbor had its origins in efforts by the European Union (EU) and United States to mitigate problems of interdependence that threatened to undermine the principles of order on which their regulatory systems were based. Safe Harbor reflects neither the EU nor U.S. approach, but rather a novel blend of state and private regulation. The article demonstrates the vital role of argument and persuasion in identifying Safe Harbor as a solution, and in negotiating its particulars. It finds that conventional game-theoretic accounts of bargaining are unable to explain the negotiation of Safe Harbor, and argues that constructivist approaches should pay more attention to how argument can disclose new possibilities of action.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , Spring 2003 , pp. 277 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, David L. 1999. Remarks of David L. Aaron, Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade, at the 4th Annual IT Policy Summit of the Information Technology Association of America, March, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Beier, David. 1999. Opening Remarks. Presented at the Conference on the Digital Economy in International Perspective: Common Construction or Regional Rivalry? 27 May, Washington, D.C. Available at ⟨http://e-conomy.berkeley.edu/events/deip/summary.html⟩.Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1997. Convergence Revisited: Toward a Global Public Policy for the Protection of Personal Data? In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Agre, Philip E. and Rotenberg, Marc, 99–123. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne. 2000. Globalization and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 3:43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1990. Essays on the Foundation of Game Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1993. De-Bayesing Game Theory. In Frontiers of Game Theory, edited by Binmore, Ken, Kriman, Alan, and Tani, Piero, 321–39. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas. 2000. When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration Online Papers 4(15). Available at ⟨http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Cavoukian, Ann, and Crompton, Malcolm. 2000. Web Seals: A Review of Online Privacy Programs. Ontario: Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, and Canberra: Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner of Australia.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? European Union Politics 2 (2):219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green. 2001. Who Writes the Rules of E-Commerce? A Case-Study of the Global Business Dialogue on E-Commerce. AICGS Policy Paper 14. Baltimore, Md.: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire. 2000. Patterns of Public-Private Interaction at the International Level: Global Governance and the Modern Lex Mercatoria. Paper presented at the Conference on Common Goods and Governance Across Multiple Arenas, Max Planck Project Group–Common Goods: Law, Politics, Economics, June–July, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization 43 (3):441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, William J., and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 1999. Global Electronic Commerce and the General Agreement on Trade in Services: The Millenium Round and Beyond. In GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, edited by Sauvé, Pierre and Stern, Robert M., 399–437. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. Forthcoming. The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the Great Powers Back In. Political Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. 2000. The Work of the OECD on Electronic Commerce. Available at ⟨http://www1.oecd.org/subject/e_commerce/Ottowa_speech.pdf⟩.Google Scholar
Egan, Michelle P. 2001. Constructing an European Market: Standards, Regulation and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union/United States. 1997. Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce. Available at ⟨http://www.qlinks.net/comdocs/eu-us.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2002. Negotiating Privacy Across Arenas: The EU-US ‘Safe Harbor’ Discussions. In Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, edited by Héritier, Adrienne, 105–26. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. Forthcoming. Hybrid Institutions and the Law: Interface Solutions or Outlaw Arrangements? Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Knight, Jack. Forthcoming. Trust, Institutions and Institutional Evolution: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis. Politics and Society.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 2000. Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory, and Farrell, Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3):505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. Michael. 1997. The Internet as a Source of Regulatory Arbitrage. In Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure, edited by Kahin, Brian and Nesson, Charles, 129–63. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. Michael. 2000a. The Death of Privacy? Stanford Law Review 52 (5):1461–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. Michael. 2000b. Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law Journal 50 (1): 17–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Union's Internal Market. In Ideas and Foreign Policy, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 173–206. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Geanakoplos, John. 1992. Common Knowledge. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (4):53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. 2000. Unilateral Regulation of the Internet: A Modest Defence. European Journal of International Law 11 (1):135–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A.. Forthcoming. Moral and Legal Rhetoric in International Relations: A Rational Choice Perspective. Journal of Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1990. Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1986. Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior. In Rational Choice, edited by Elster, Jon, 82–107. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Dorothee, and Fandel, Marie-Helène. 2002. Projecting EU Regimes Abroad: The EU Data Protection Regime as Global Standard. Paper presented at the 98th Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, Boston.Google Scholar
Hurley, Deborah, and Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. 2000. Information Policy and Governance. In Governance in a Globalizing World, edited by Nye, Joseph S. Jr. and Donahue, John D., 135–151. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David R., and Post, David. 1996. Law and Borders: The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review 48 (5):1367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James. 1997. Symbol and Strategy in Comparative Political Analysis. APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 8 (2):6–9.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 2002. How Conceptual Problems Migrate: Rational Choice, Interpretation, and the Hazards of Pluralism. Annual Review of Political Science 5:223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2000. Power and Interdependence. 3d ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Knill, Christoph, and Lehmkuhl, Dirk. 2002. Private Actors and State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance. Governance 15 (1):41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J. 1997. The Architecture of Globalization: State Sovereignty in a Networked Global Economy. In Governments, Globalization, and International Business, edited by Dunning, John H., 146–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J. 2002. Safe Harbors Are Hard to Find: The Transatlantic Data Privacy Dispute, Territorial Jurisdiction and Global Governance. Unpublished manuscript, Wharton Business School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J. Forthcoming. Economic Governance in an Electronically Networked Global Economy. In The Emergence of Private Authority: Forms of Private Authority and Their Implications for Global Governance, edited by Hall, Rodney Bruce and Biersteker, Thomas J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):336–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 2001. Globalization, Power and Authority. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4):753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, William, and Quek, Pang. Forthcoming. Personal Data Privacy Protection in the Age of Globalization: The EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Compromise. Journal of European Public Policy.Google Scholar
Mann, Catherine L., Eckert, Sue E., and Knight, Sarah Cleeland. 2000. Global Electronic Commerce: A Policy Primer. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 2001a. Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration. International Organization 55 (4):919–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 2001b. The Politics and Economics of International Institutional Standards Setting: An Introduction. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3):328–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. 1997. Generational Development of Data Protection in Europe. In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Agre, Philip E. and Rotenberg, Marc, 219–41. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information. International Organization 48 (3):387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Abraham, and Bach, David. 2001. In the Shadow of the State: Self-Regulatory Trajectories in a Digital Age. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August–September, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham, and Bach, David. 2002. The Transnationalization of Regulation. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of Europeanists, March, Chicago.Google Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 2001. Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1):37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Priscilla M. 1999. American Business and the European Data Protection Directive: Lobbying Strategies and Tactics. In Visions of Privacy: Policy Choices for the Digital Age, edited by Bennett, Colin J. and Grant, Rebecca, 199–216. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1991. Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory. Econometrica 59 (4):909–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1994. Community and Autonomy. Multi-Level Policy Making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 1 (2):1350–1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Susan. 1998. Overall Comments on the Safe Harbor Program. Available at ⟨www.ita.doc.gov/td/ecom/com4abc.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2000. Globalization and Social Protection: The Impact of EU and International Rules in the Ratcheting Up of U.S. Privacy Standards. Yale Journal of International Law 25 (1):1–88.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. Forthcoming. Managing U.S.-EU Trade Relations through Mutual Recognition and Safe Harbor Agreements: “New” and “Global” Approaches to Transatlantic Economic Governance? Columbia Journal of European Law.Google Scholar
Simon, Leslie David. 2000. NetPolicy.Com: Public Agenda for a Digital World. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Spar, Debora L. 1999. Lost in (Cyber)space: The Private Rules of Online Commerce. In Private Authority and International Affairs, edited by Cutler, A. Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony, 31–51. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Spar, Debora L. 2001. Ruling the Waves: Cycles of Discovery, Chaos, and Wealth from the Compass to the Internet. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
Stone-Sweet, Alec. 1999. Islands of Transnational Governance. Unpublished manuscript, Nuffield College, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1985. Community, Market, State–and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order, in Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe C., 1–29. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Swire, Peter P., and Litan, Robert E.. 1998. None of Your Business: World Data Flows, Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
White House. 1997. A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce. Available at ⟨http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-framework-970706.html⟩.Google Scholar
White House. 2000. Fact Sheet: Data Privacy Accord with EU (Safe Harbor). Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary, White House. Available at ⟨http://www.useu.be/SUMMIT/fsdataprivacy.html⟩.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1991. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization 45 (3):281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zysman, John, and Weber, Steven. 2001. Governance and Politics of the Internet Economy–Historical Transformation or Ordinary Politics with a New Vocabulary? Available at ⟨http://e-conomy.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/wp141.pdf⟩.Google Scholar