Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-pd9xq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:03:50.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private Life and the Margin of Appreciation, the European Court of Human Rights: Alex Springer Ag v. Germany and von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Guido Westkamp
Guido Westkamp*
Affiliation:
Centre for Commercial Law Studies Queen Mary, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 631 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

1 Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2) [GC], App. Nos. 40660/08 & 60641/08 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Feb. 7, 2012); Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], App. No. 39954/08 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Feb. 7, 2012).

2 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Nov. 4, 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222 (entered into force Sept. 3, 1953).

3 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerGE] [Federal Constitutional Court] Feb. 26, 2008, 1 BVerfGE 1602/07, Absatz-Nr. (1-109), available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20080226_1bvr160207.html.

4 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerGE] [Federal Constitutional Court] Oct. 14, 2004, 2 BvRGE 1481/04, Absatz-Nr. (1-73), Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 3407, 2004 (Ger.). available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20041014_2bvrl48104.html.

5 See MGN Ltd. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 39401/04, ¶¶ 150, 155 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Jan. 18, 2012); Palomo Sanchez v. Spain, App. Nos. 28955/06, 28957/04, 28959/04, 28964/06, ¶ 57 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Sept. 12, 2011).

6 See Chauvy & Others v. France, 2004-VI Eur. Ct. H.R. ¶ 70; see also Pfeifer v. Austria, App. No. 12556/03, ¶ 35 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Nov. 15, 2007).

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the European Court of Human Rights Web site (visited June 5, 2012) http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-109034.

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the European Court of Human Rights Web site (visited June 5, 2012) http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-109029.