Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:57:45.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The International Criminal Court: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute and Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jennifer Easterday
Jennifer Easterday*
Affiliation:
Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies, Leiden University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Materials
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 51 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 1018 - 1205
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the International Criminal Court Web site (visited November 15, 2012) http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/docl379838.pdf.

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the International Criminal Court Web site (visited November 15, 2012) http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/docl438370.pdf.

1 Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ¶ 917 (Mar. 14, 2012) [hereinafter Judgment Pursuant to Article 74].

2 Id. ¶ 1006.

3 Id. ¶ 1013.

4 Id. ¶ 1013.

5 Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford, 1 10 (Mar. 14, 2012).

6 Id. ¶¶ 15-17.

7 Judgment Pursuant to Article 74, supra note 1, ¶ 607.

8 Id. ¶ 618.

9 Id. ¶ 617.

10 Id. ¶ 620.

11 Id. ¶ 628.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id.. ¶ 629-30.

15 Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Odio Benito, ¶¶ 8-20 (Mar. 14, 2012).

16 Judgment Pursuant to Article 74, ¶¶ 178-205.

17 Id. ¶ 482.

18 Id.

19 Id.

20 Id. ¶ 479-80.

21 Judge Odio Benito dissented the majority’s decision to the extent that it disregards the damage to the victims and their families, especially with regards to the commission of sexual violence and harsh punishments received by the children, and considered that Lubanga should be sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment. See Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Odio Benito.

22 Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, ¶¶ 107-8 (July 10, 2012).

23 Id. ¶ 57-81.

24 Id. ¶ 75.

25 Id. ¶ 91.