Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:06:44.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Court of Human Rights (GC): Şahin v. Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Chris Jenks
Chris Jenks*
Affiliation:
Office of The Judge Advocate General at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Materials
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 268 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

1 Şahin v. Turkey, App. No 13279/05 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Oct. 20, 2011).

2 See European Convention on Human Rights art. 6, Nov. 4, 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 221.

3 The minority disputes that characterization, citing the “flagrant inconsistency within the same branch of the court system,” referring to the Administrative Court (emphasis in original). Different chambers of the Administrative Court reached opposite conclusions on whether that court had jurisdiction to consider the various family members’ claims.

4 For arguably the opposite boundary of the European Court’s consideration of military processes, see Al Skeini v. United Kingdom, App. No. 55721/07 (Eur. Ct. H.R. July 7, 2011) (holding that British military investigations of the deaths of Iraqis killed by British troops did not comply with Article 2 of the Convention).