No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2017
[1] J By previous opinion, this Court sustained a plea of sovereign immunity from execution as to the judgment here reviewed. State v. Dekle, Fla.App.1962, 137 so.2d 581.
[2] In Karris & Co. Advertising, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, Fla. App. 1961, 127 So.2d 687, we discussed the traditional rule which denies one sovereign the right to sit in court over another sovereign. The holding in the Harris case is not pertinent here since involved there was the doctrine of sovereign immunity (not applicable here as shown above) and the liability of a foreign sovereign to suit for commercial acts performed in this country.