Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:52:40.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Copenhagen Process Principles and Guidelines on the Handling of Detainees in International Military Operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jonathan Horowitz
Jonathan Horowitz*
Affiliation:
Open Society Justice Initiative's National Security and Counterterrorism program
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 51 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 1364 - 1380
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

1 Copenhagen Process on the Handling of Detainees in International Military Operations, The Copenhagen Process Principles and Guidelines, preambular ¶ II (July 2012), available at http://um.dk/en/~/media/UM/English-site/Documents/Politics-and-diplomacy/Copenhangen%20Process%20Principles%20and%20Guidelines.pdf [hereinafter Principles].

2 See Minutes of the 3rd Conference on the Handling of Detainees in International Military Operations, Copenhagen (Oct. 18-19,2012) (as recorded by the Chair) [hereinafter Minutes]; Thomas Winkler, The Handling of Detainees in Military Operations: An Update on the Copenhagen Process, Summary of Event at the British Institute of Int’l & Comp. L., available at http://www.biicl.org/files/4547_copenhagen_process.pdf.

3 Principles, supra note 1, preambular ¶¶ II & XI.

4 See Winkler, Thomas, The Copenhagen Process on Detainees: A Necessity, 78 Nordic J. Int’l L. 489, at 496 (2009).Google Scholar

5 Ministry of Foreign Aff. of Denmark Legal Serv., Non-Paper on Legal Framework and Aspects of Detention 3 (Oct. 2007) [hereinafter Non-Paper].

6 Id. at 4.

7 Geneva Convention [III] Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3316, 75 U.N.T.S. 135; Geneva Convention [IV] Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3516, 75 U.N.T.S. 287.

8 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Convention of Aug. 12, 1949 and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, Jun. 8, 1977, 16 I.L.M. 1391 (1977).

9 See Rep. of the Int’l Comm. Red Cross, Strengthening Legal Protection for Victims of Armed Conflict, 311C/11/5.1.1, at 9 (2011) (“While international humanitarian law contains detailed rules on conditions of detention in international armed conflicts, this is not the case in conflicts not of an international character.”); see also Non-Paper, supra note 5.

10 See Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 2004 I.C.J. 136 (July 9); Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo, Judgment, 2005 I.C.J. 168 (2005); Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 1996 I.C.J. 226 (July 8).

11 See generally Horowitz, Jonathan, Positive Obligations, Human Rights, and Armed Con?ict: Implementing the Right to Education in Occupied Territories, 1 J. Int’l Humanitarian Stud. 304 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Non-Paper, supra note 5, at 2.

13 Winkler, supra note 4, at 497.

14 Id.

15 Representatives from the following governments welcomed the Principles: Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Sweden, Turkey, Uganda, United Kingdom, and United States. Minutes, supra note 2.

16 Id.; see also Principles, supra note 1, ¶ XIII.

17 See also Oswald, Bruce “Ossie” & Winkler, Thomas, Copenhagen Process Principles and Guidelines on the Handling of Detainees in International Military Operations, ASIL Insights (Dec. 26, 2012), available at http://www.asil.org/pdfs/insights/insightl21226.pdf [hereinafter ASIL Insights].Google Scholar

18 Id.

19 See generally Horowitz, Jonathan, Transferring Wartime Detainees and a State’s Responsibility to Prevent Torture, 2 Am. U. Nat’l Sec. L. Brief (2012).Google Scholar

20 See also Jacques Hartmann, The Copenhagen Process: Principles and Guidelines, EJIL: Talk (Nov. 3, 2012), http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-copenhagen-process-principles-andguidelines/.

21 ASIL Insights, supra note 17.

22 Amnesty Int’l, Outcome of Copenhagen Process on Detainees in International Military Operations Undermines Respect for Human Rights, AI Index IOR 50/003/2012, Oct. 23, 2012, available at http://www.arrmesty.org/eri/library/asset/IOR50/003/2012/en/1186a695-097e-47eb-8b93-3d282f4c54cd/ior5-00032012en.pdf.

23 Id.

24 See Horowitz, supra note 19, at 59.

25 ASIL Insights, supra note 17.

26 Id.

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark Web site (visited December 31, 2012) http://um.dk/en/~/mediaAJM/English-site/Documents/Politics-and-diplomacy/Copenhangen%20Process%-20Principles%20and%20Guidelines.pdf.