No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
[ Reproduced from the text provided By the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The agreement deciding that the Commission would determine the amount of compensation due, done at Santiago, June 11, 1990, appears at 30 I.L.M. 412 (1991); the agreement is also reproduced in the text of this decision.
[The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Memorandum Opinion addressing jurisdictional issues in the suit brought by the families of Letelier and Moffitt against Chile appears at 19 I.L.M. 409 (1980); a later Memorandum Opinion by the same court, at 19 I.L.M. 1418 (1980), sets forth amounts the plaintiffs were entitled to in judgments by default.]
* [ Reproduced from the text provided By the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The agreement deciding that the Commission would determine the amount of compensation due, done at Santiago, June 11, 1990, appears at 30 I.L.M. 412 (1991); the agreement is also reproduced in the text of this decision.
[The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Memorandum Opinion addressing jurisdictional issues in the suit brought by the families of Letelier and Moffitt against Chile appears at 19 I.L.M. 409 (1980); a later Memorandum Opinion by the same court, at 19 I.L.M. 1418 (1980), sets forth amounts the plaintiffs were entitled to in judgments by default.]