Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:18:28.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canada: Supreme Court Opinion in United States v. The Public Service Alliance of Canada Et Al (Canadian State Immunity Act)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 1 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Introductory Note was prepared for International Legal Materials by Linda C. Reif, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Canada, and I.L.M. Corresponding Editor for Canada.

[The Canadian State Immunity Act is reproduced at 21 I.L.M. 798 (1982). The United Kindgom State Immunity Act, 1978, appears at 17 I.L.M. 1123 (1978). The U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 appears at 15 I.L.M. 1388 (1976); amendments appear at 28 I.L.M. 396 (1989).]

1 State Immunity Act. R.S.C. 1985, c.S-18, as am. For commentary see e.g. H.L. Motot and M.L. Jewett, “The State Immunity Act of Canada” (1982), 20 Can. Yrbk. Int'l Law 79; B. Coad, “The Canadian State Immunity Act” (1983), 14 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 1197; C. Emanuelli, “Commentaire: La toi sur l'immunité des États” (1985) , 45 R. du B. 81; E. Morgan, International Law and the Canadian Courts (1990).

2 U.K.: State Immunity Act. 1978. Stats. U.K. 1978, c. 33; Trendtex Trading Corp. Ltd. v. Central Bank of Nigeria. [1977] 1 Q.B. 529 (C.A.). U.S.A.: Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976. 28 U.S.C. 1602 et seq.; 1952 Tate Letter, 26 Dep't State Bull. 984. For Developments in other states see C.H. Schreuer, State Immunity; Some Recent Developments (1988) .

3 [1971] S.C.R. 997. The majority found that the relevant act of the foreign state was a public or sovereign act.

4 Id. at 1024-25 (per Laskin J.).

5 See e.g. Zodiak International Products Inc. v. Polish Peopled Republic (1977), 81 D.L.R. (3d) 656 (Que. C.A.); Smith v. Canadian Javelin Ltd. (1976), 68 D.L.R. (3d) 428 (Ont. H.C.J.); Amanat Khan v. Fredson Travel Inc. (No. 2)(1982), 36 O.R. (2d) 17(H.C.J.); The Ship “Atra” v. torac Transport (1986), 28 D.L.R. (4th) 309 (Fed. C.A.).

6 Motot and Jewett, supra, n. 1, at 96-99.

7 State Immunity Act, supra, n. 1, s.3(l) states: “Except as provided by this Act, a foreign state is immune from the jurisdiction of any court in Canada.” See similar provision in s. 12(1) of the Act (a foreign state's property tocated in Canada is immune from attachment, execution, etc. unless provided otherwise).

8 Motot and Jewett, supra, n. 1, at 96-97.

9 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, s. 1603 (d)

10 Motot and Jewett, supra, n. 1, at 97-99.

11 See e.g. Jaffe v. Miller (1990), 75 O.R. (2d) 133 (H.C.J.); D & J Coustas Shipping Co. S.A. v. Cia de Naveqacao Ltoyd Brasileiro (1990), 24 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1004 (Fed.C. T.D.).

12 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 50; rev'q Re State Immunity Act. [1990] 1 F.C. 332, 100 N.R. 221 (Fed.C.A.).