Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T03:15:45.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bédat v. Switzerland (Eur. Ct. H.R.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Dimitrios Kagiaros
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Materials
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , 2016 , pp. 1126 - 1156
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Endnotes

1 Bédat v. Switzerland, 2016-IV Eur. Ct. H.R. 730 [hereinafter Bédat].

2 A.B. v. Switzerland, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2014), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i_001-145457 [hereinafter A.B.].

3 See infra note 6.

4 Bédat, supra note 1, ¶ 50.

5 Id.

6 Rusu v. Romania, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2016), http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2016/252.html; Brambilla v. Italy, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2016), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i_001-163915; Salihu v. Sweden, Decision on Admissibility, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2016), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i_001-163642; Erdtmann v. Germany, Decision on Admissibility, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2016), http://Hudoc.Echr.Coe.Int/Eng?I_001-160437.

7 Dirk Voorhoof, Guest Post: Grand Chamber Judgment Bédat v Switzerland, ECHR BLOG (Nov. 23, 2016), http://echrblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/guest-post-grand-chamberjudgment-bedat.html.

8 See Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2), 2012-I Eur. Ct. H.R. 399.

9 See Springer AG v. Germany, 55 Eur. H.R. Rep. 183 (2012); Stoll v. Switzerland, 2007-V Eur. Ct. H.R. 267.

10 Bédat, supra note 1, ¶ 76.

11 Id. ¶ 65.

12 Id. ¶ 76.

13 A.B., supra note 2, ¶ 60.

14 Id.

15 Haldimann v. Switzerland, Eur. Ct. H.R. ¶ 57 (2015), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i_001-152711; Voorhoof, supra note 7.

16 Bédat, supra note 1, ¶ 65.

17 Voorhoof, supra note 7.

page1156 note 1 314 U.S 260.

page1156 note 2 384 U.S. 333 (1966).

page1156 note 3 Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 593, (1976).

page1156 note 4 The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, no. 6538/74, § 65, 26 April 1979.

page1156 note 5 Tourancheau and July v. France, no. 53886/00, § 65, 24 November 2005).

page1156 note 6 427 U.S. 593 (1976).

page1156 note 7 I. Ya. Foinitskiy. “The course of criminal proceedings: in 2 volumes”, SPb., 1898, volume 1., p. 96–97.

page1156 note 8 See Recommendation Rec(2003)13 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member States on the provision of information through the media in relation to criminal proceedings, see paragraph 21 of the present judgment.