Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:34:35.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interim Resolution CM/RESDH(2017)429: Execution of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Ilgar Mammadov Against Azerbaijan (Council of Eur. Comm. of Ministers)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2018

Julie-Enni Zastrow
Julie-Enni Zastrow*
Affiliation:
Julie-Enni Zastrow currently works as a litigation lawyer in Berlin, Germany. She holds law degrees from Germany and France and a PhD in international law from the University of Potsdam, Germany. Her PhD research focused on the role of the Committee of Minsters of the Council of Europe in supervising the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On December 5, 2017, the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers (Committee) issued an interim resolution concerning the European Court of Human Rights case of Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan. In this resolution, the Committee, for the first time ever, launched infringement proceedings against a member state of the European Convention of Human Rights (Convention).

Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 358 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by The American Society of International Law 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 Committee of Ministers, Execution of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Ilgar Mammadov Against Azerbaijan, Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)429 (Dec. 5, 2017) [hereinafter Interim Resolution].

2 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms art. 46(1), Nov. 4, 1950, 213 UNTS 221 [hereinafter Convention].

3 Id. art. 46(2).

4 All member states of the Council of Europe are also parties to the Convention.

5 Hirst v. The United Kingdom (No. 2), (2005) Eur. Ct. H.R. 681.

6 See Marina Aksenova, Anchugov and Gladkov Is Not Enforceable: The Russian Constitutional Court Opines in Its First ECtHR Implementation Case, Opinio Juris (Apr. 25, 2016), at http://opiniojuris.org/2016/04/25/anchugov-and-gladkov-is-not-enforceable-the-russian-constitutional-court-opines-in-its-first-ecthr-implementation-case/.

7 Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Amending the Control System of the Convention, CETS 194, May 13, 2004, § 100.

8 Convention, supra note 2, art. 46(4).

9 Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, App. No. 15172/13 (Eur. Ct. H.R., May 22, 2014) [hereinafter Mammadov].

10 Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (No. 2), App. No. 919/15 (Eur. Ct. H.R., Nov. 16, 2017).

11 Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)379, Oct. 25, 2017.

12 Interim Resolution, supra note 1, appendix.

13 Interim Resolution, supra note 1, ¶¶ a, d, f.

14 Mammadov, supra note 9, ¶ 137.

15 Mammadov, supra note 9, ¶ 143.

16 Interim Resolution, supra note 1, ¶¶ b, c.

17 Papamichalopoulos v. Greece (Art. 50), (1993) Eur. Ct. H.R. 28, ¶ 34.

18 Interim Resolution, supra note 1, ¶ f.

19 Convention, supra note 2, art. 46(5).