Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:03:47.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regina (Ullah) v. Special Adjudicator;

United Kingdom, England.  17 June 2004 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Aliens — Entry — Asylum — Asylum-seeker failing to establish refugee status — Other grounds for claiming asylum — Claim that asylum-seeker’s rights to practise, teach and preach religion would be violated — Whether sufficient ground for resisting return to State of nationality

Human rights — Deportation and expulsion of aliens — Circumstances in which apprehended breach of human rights of a person abroad requires State not to remove person — Principle in Soering v. United Kingdom — Rights attracting obligation — Requisite degree of likelihood of breach — Necessary extent of breach — Interaction with obligations relating to refugees — Role of principle that sovereign States may regulate entry of aliens into their territory — Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951 — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Human rights — Religion — Right to manifest religious beliefs — Right to preach and teach religion — European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)