Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:51:34.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Klöckner Industrie-Anlagen GmbH and Others v. Republic of Cameroon

United Nations Human Rights Comm.  21 October 1983 ; 03 May 1985 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — ICSID arbitration clauses in agreements between government and company — Whether superseded by later agreement — Jurisdiction ratione materiae — Doctrine of forum prorogatum — Written submissions — Whether sufficient evidence of acceptance of tribunals’ jurisdiction

Arbitration — Annulment — Grounds for annulment — Excess of jurisdiction — Requirement that excess must be manifest — Uncertainty to be resolved in favorem validitatis sententiae — Distinction between non-application of applicable law and mistaken application of applicable law — Alleged absence of deliberation and other irregularities — Alleged lack of impartiality — Whether constituting failure of tribunal to adhere to fundamental rules of procedure — Contradiction of reasons — Dubious or hypothetical reasons — Sufficiently relevant reasons — Alleged failure of tribunal to deal with questions submitted to it — Challenge to award of arbitral tribunal — ICSID — Reference to ad hoc Committee — Powers of Committee — Whether limited to annulment for manifest excess of jurisdiction — Whether error of law constituting manifest excess of jurisdiction — Consequences of annulment — Whether award to be annulled in whole or in part

Arbitration — Applicable law — ICSID arbitration — Absence of express choice of law — Law of Contracting State to apply — Inclusion of Contracting State’s rules on conflict of laws — Part of Contracting State applying common law while other part applying civil law — Geographical location of project — Applicability of civil law

Claims — For breach of contract — Effect of non-disclosure of circumstances adversely affecting profitability of project — Deductions from claim as result of failure adequately to perform contractual obligations — Exceptio non adimpleti contractus — Release of one party from obligations by virtue of non-performance by other party — Whether principle of international law

Claims — Counterclaim — For damages — Claim by State for losses attributable to participation in failed joint venture project — Capital contribution to joint venture company — Government-guaranteed loans — Non-financial damages — Alleged failure of company to perform duty of disclosure — Effect of denial of company’s claim for contract price on government’s counterclaim

Treaties — Interpretation — Annulment provisions of ICSID Convention — Interpretation of provisions relating to applicable law — Whether interpreted in accordance with general principles of treaty interpretation

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)