Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:44:00.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guzzardi Case

European Court of Human Rights.  06 November 1980 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts and omissions of State organs and officials — Exhaustion of domestic remedies — European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, Article 26 — Whether Article of Convention to be relied on expressly before domestic courts — Whether complaints before domestic courts relating to conduct in breach of Convention provisions relied on before Convention institutions

State responsibility — Damages — Award of damages in general — European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Request for compensation for prejudice suffered through unjust deprivation of liberty — Equitable determination of — Restitutio in integrum

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Admissibility of complaint — European Convention on Human Rights 1950, Article 25 — Extent of jurisdiction of EuropeanCommission of Human Rights — Whether complaints raised on applicant's own initiative — Date of decision of admissibility — Whether application has object and purpose — Whether application to be struck off the list

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, Article 5(1) — Unjust deprivation of liberty — Order of Italian court obliging alleged mafioso to reside in restricted area under police supervision — Whether conditions and implementation of residence amounting to deprivation of liberty — Whether justified under Article 5(1) paras. (a)-(f)

Article 8 — Respect for private and family life — Compatibility of compulsory residence order — Article 9 — Freedom of religion — Article 3 — Whether compulsory residence amounting to inhuman or degrading treatment — First Protocol to Convention, Article 2 — Right to education

Fourth Protocol to Convention — Non-ratification by State party to Convention — Article 2 — Restriction of movement and place of residence — Comparison between this provision and Article 5 of the Convention

Article 25 — Admissibility of application — Extent of jurisdiction of European Commission of Human Rights — Whether complaints before Commission raised on applicant's own initiative — Date of decision on admissibility — Whether application having object or purpose — Whether application should be struck off the list

Article 26 — Exhaustion of domestic remedies — Whether provisions of Convention to be relied on expressly before domestic courts — Whether complaints raised before domestic courts relating to conduct in breach of Convention may be relied on before Convention institutions

Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Request for compensation for prejudice suffered — Equitable determination of — Restitutio in integrum

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)