Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:50:20.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estate of Michael Heiser and 121 Others v. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security

United Kingdom, England.  31 July 2019 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — State immunity — Immunity from suit — Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, Section 31 — State Immunity Act 1978, Section 5 — Whether judgment against a State obtained in a foreign jurisdiction can be enforced in English courts

State immunity — Procedure — Service of proceedings on a foreign State — State Immunity Act 1978, Section 12 — Whether service of proceedings in compound of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of a foreign State constituting good service — Whether service was received by a foreign State where its Ministry of Foreign Affairs had refused to accept service — Whether service by email to Ministry of Foreign Affairs of a foreign State constituting good service

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Human rights — Right to a fair trial — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 6 — State Immunity Act 1978, Section 5 — Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, Section 31(1)(b) — English court’s interpretation of United Kingdom legislation — Whether Article 6 of European Convention having role to play

Terrorism — State-sponsored terrorism — Money damages awarded in United States judgments — Whether act of State-sponsored terrorism governmental or private act — Whether Section 3 of State Immunity Act 1978 applicable — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)