Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:29:05.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Reservations on the Entry into Force of the American Convention (Articles 74 And 75)

Inter-American Court of Human Right.  24 September 1982 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Whether States parties to human rights treaties assumed obligations towards individuals — Individual right to petition — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

Treaties — In general — Conception and function of treaties — Character of human rights treaties compared to traditional multilateral treaties — Object and purpose — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

Treaties — Conclusion and operation of treaties — Ratification of treaties — With reservations — Entry into force — Whether dependent on acceptance by other States parties — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

Treaties — Interpretation of treaties — Principles and rules of interpretation — Interpretation of provisions in their context — Object and purpose of the treaty

Treaties — Interpretation of treaties — Consideration of preparatory work — Examination ofpreparatory work of the American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

Disputes — Other international courts — Inter-American Court of Human Rights — Scope of advisory jurisdiction — Whether Inter-American Commission competent to request advisory opinion — Adjudicatory and advisory machinery — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

Treaties — Conclusion and operation of treaties — Reservations — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969, Articles 74 and 75 — Entry into force of a ratification with a reservation — Whether dependent on acceptance by other States parties — Competence of Court to give advisory opinion — Competence of Commission to request advisory opinion — Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, 1969 — Object and purpose of reservation — Character of human rights treaties compared with traditional multilateral treaties — Whether State parties assumed obligations towards individuals or other States — Availability of adjudicatory and advisory machinery to object to reservations

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)