Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T08:37:10.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Axen Case

European Court of Human Rights.  29 June 1982 ; 08 December 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(1) — Whether literal interpretation acceptable — Form of publicity — Assessment in light of special features of proceedings — Entirety of proceedings to be taken into account

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and rules of interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(1) — Civil proceedings — Right to public pronouncement of judgment — Literal interpretation — Object and purpose of Article 6 — Fair trial — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of Convention

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — European Commission of Human Rights — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Jurisdiction of Chamber of Court — Whether to be relinquished in favour of plenary Court — Preliminary objection — Decision by Commission to refer case to Court — Whether Court has jurisdiction to evaluate expediency of decision

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — Civil proceedings — Right to public hearing and public pronouncement of judgment — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 6(1) — Fair trial — Entirety of proceedings to be taken into account — Form of publicity — Literal interpretation of Article 6(1) — Whether acceptable — Assessment in light of special features of proceedings — Object and purpose of Article 6 — Whether case raising serious questions affecting interpretation of Convention — Jurisdiction of Chamber of European Court of Human Rights — Whether to be relinquished in favour of plenary Court — Preliminary objection — Decision by European Commission of Human Rights to refer case to Court — Whether Court has jurisdiction to evaluate expediency of decision

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)