Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:24:27.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Inc. v. Westpac Banking Corporation

Australia.  14 December 1988 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Diplomatic relations — Immunity — Proceedings in which diplomatic agent is a necessary and proper party — Proceedings relating to acts performed by diplomatic agent in official capacity — Whether joinder of diplomatic agent as party infringes diplomatic immunity and immunity of the foreign State — Proceedings relating to funds donated by Saudi Arabia on condition that control of funds exercised jointly by ambassador and recipient of donation — Whether ambassador a necessary and proper party — Whether court bound to stay proceedings — Common law — Australian Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967, Article 31

State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — State agent — Funds donated by ambassador on behalf of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on condition that control of funds exercised jointly by ambassador and recipient of donation — Whether ambassador a necessary and proper party to proceedings — Whether joinder as party in proceedings would have effect of impleading foreign State — Whether partial control over funds sufficient to base claim of immunity — Whether court bound to stay proceedings — Whether party not being the representative of the State nor its ambassador can raise issue of immunity — The law of Australia

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)