Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:40:06.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Western Sahara Case

International Court of Justice.  22 May 1975 ; 16 October 1975 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State territory — In general — Nature of territorial sovereignty — Western Sahara-Desert region populated by nomadic tribes — Colonized in late nineteenth century by Spain — Whether terra nullius at time of colonization — Rights of nomadic tribes — Intertemporal law — Some tribes owing personal allegiance to Sultan of Morocco — Whether Western Sahara part of Moroccan territory — Relationship between personal allegiance and territorial sovereignty — Importance of religious ties — Proof of sovereignty — Immemorial possession — Evaluation of historical evidence — Importance of social, political, religious and cultural links with Mauritanian entity — Whether Western Sahara part of Mauritanian entity

Principle of self — determination — Whether a part of international law — Application of principle to decolonization of non-selfgoverning territory — Whether a requirement that people of the territory should be consulted — Whether consultation or choice offered to take any particular form — Concept of reintegration of colonized territory into former national State — Whether concept subject to overriding importance of self — determination-Nature of legal ties between State and colonized territory necessary for concept of reintegration to apply

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Advisory jurisdiction — Competence of Court limited to questions possessing legal character — Whether question must affect existing legal rights — Mixed questions of law and fact — Lack of consent of State specially interested in proceedings — Whether relevant to competence or to propriety of giving an opinion — Subject of request for advisory opinion overlapping with subject of dispute between States — Nature of a legal dispute between States — Whether advisory jurisdiction appropriate for determination of question involving complicated factual considerations — Object of request to guide United Nations as to form of decolonization — Propriety — Composition of Court — Conditions for appointment of judge ad hoc Subjects of international law — States — States taking different forms — Special characteristics of Sherifian State in nineteenth century Morocco — Need to take these characteristics into account in considering questions of territorial sovereignty and personal allegiance — Tribes and emirates of Mauritania not formed into State — Whether a legal entity — Whether group possessing rights against its members — Whether Islamic Republic of Mauritania succeeding to any such rights

Treaties — Interpretation — Bi-lingual treaties — Material differences between Arabic and Spanish texts — Value of treaties as evidence of international recognition of sovereignty

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)