No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Regina (Ullah) v. Special Adjudicator;
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Aliens — Entry — Asylum — Asylum-seeker failing to establish refugee status — Other grounds for claiming asylum — Claim that asylum-seeker’s rights to practise, teach and preach religion would be violated — Whether sufficient ground for resisting return to State of nationality
Human rights — Deportation and expulsion of aliens — Circumstances in which apprehended breach of human rights of a person abroad requires State not to remove person — Principle in Soering v. United Kingdom — Rights attracting obligation — Requisite degree of likelihood of breach — Necessary extent of breach — Interaction with obligations relating to refugees — Role of principle that sovereign States may regulate entry of aliens into their territory — Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951 — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950
Human rights — Religion — Right to manifest religious beliefs — Right to preach and teach religion — European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 — The law of England
Keywords
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2007