Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:07:48.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Golder Case

European Court of Human Rights.  21 February 1975 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Sources — Codification treaty not yet in force — Value to international tribunal — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969

Treaties — Interpretation — Principles and rules of interpretation — Codification of rules in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 — Whether special approach required for organic treaty — European Convention on Human Rights

Treaties — Interpretation — Bilingual treaties — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights — Examination and comparison of English and French texts

Treaties — Special kinds of treaties — Treaties establishing special regimes — Whether special rules of interpretation applicable — European Convention on Human Rights

The individual in international law — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights — Prisoner's desire to contact legal adviser with view to taking proceedings against prison official refused by the authorities — Article 6(1) (right to a fair and public hearing in determining civil rights and obligations) — Whether Article 6(1) confers a right of access to the courts — Hindrance of effective exercise of right as an infringement — Whether right of access is absolute or subject to implied limitations — Limitation not to interfere with substance of a protected right

Interpretation of the Convention — Cognisance of Articles 31 to 33 of Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties — Interpretation of treaty as a unity — Comparison of French and English texts of Article 6(1) — Relationship of this to other Articles of the Convention — Significance of Preamble to the Convention as regards interpretation — The phrase “rule of law” — Principle of good faith — Importance of the concept of “rule of law” in the context of the Council of Europe — “General principles of law recognised by civilised nations” in the context of the Convention

Article 8 (respect for correspondence) — Impeding initiation of correspondence an “interference” within Article 8(2) — Whether there are implied limitations additional to those set out in Article 8(2) — Application of limitations in Article 8(2) — Power of appreciation left to Contracting States — Appraisal of necessity of interference by the Government — Legitimacy of taking into consideration the ordinary and reasonable requirements of imprisonment in applying the stated limitations

Article 50 (just satisfaction) — Question ready for decision and thus not reserved — The finding of violations of the Applicant's rights in the matter sufficient satisfaction

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)