Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:15:41.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eritrea’s Damages Claims (Eritrea/Ethiopia)

Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission.  17 August 2009 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Claims — Eritrea — Ethiopia Claims Commission — Eritrean — Ethiopian war 1998-2000 — Eritrea’s claims — Liability phase — Commission deciding on extent of Ethiopia’s liability in Awards — Final phase — Damages phase — Eritrea claiming compensation for violations of international law — Nationality of claims — Eritrea also claiming on behalf of its nationals — Dual nationals and long-term residents — Lack of time and resources — State-to-State claims — Claims divided into two groups — Group Number One comprising war front, prisoner of war and displaced persons claims and preliminary issues — Group Number Two comprising all remaining claims including civilians or home front claims and six individual claims — Quantum of damage

Damages — “Fast-track” damages phase — Monetary compensation — Satisfaction — Quantification of monetary damages — Function of compensation — Chorzów Factory test — Parties’ economic positions — Relevance — Economic conditions — Applicable legal principles — Article 5(13) of Algiers Agreement of 12 December 2000 — Relevant international law rules — Res judicata — Role of evidence and burden of proof — Proof of facts — Causation — Factors in assessment of compensation — Nature, seriousness and extent of unlawful acts — Intention — Mitigating circumstances — Victim numbers — Implication of injuries for victims — Group Number One damages claims — Ethiopia liable for damage on Central and Western Fronts — Loss of personal and business property — Damage to or destruction of buildings — Consequential damages — Damage to cultural property — Mistreatment of prisoners of war — Rape — Displacement of population of Awgaro — Group Number Two damages claims — Deprivation of nationality — Applicability of dominant and effective nationality rule — Wrongful expulsion — Harsh conditions of departure — Property losses by persons previously residing in Ethiopia — Property losses by non-residents — Other non-resident property — Unlawful detention of Eritrean civilians — Diplomatic claim — Individual claims — Compensation awarded to Eritrea for Ethiopia’s violations of jus in bello

State responsibility — Causation — Proximity — Nationality of claims — Responsibility for violations of jus in bello

War and armed conflict — Enforcement and implementation — Damages — For violations of jus ad bellum and jus in bello — Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)