Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T19:26:08.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cyprus v. Turkey Decision on the Admissibility of the Application

European Commission of Human Rights.  10 July 1978 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Nature and binding force Enforcement — Treaties — Non-recognition by one party to treaty of government of another party — Whether treaty still in force between the two States — Whether unrecognized government possessescapacity to bring claim to enforce treaty — European Convention on Human Rights

States as international persons — In general — Recognition of acts of foreign States and governments — Government lodging application with European Commission of Human Rights — Alleged constitutional defect in Governments decision to lodge application — Whether a bar to admissibility of application — European Convention on Human Rights

State territory — In general — Occupation of foreign territory in time of peace — Occupation of northern Cyprus by Turkish army — Whether Turkey’responsibility engaged by alleged violations of human rights in occupied areas — Whether European Convention on Human Rights applies to activities of State outside its own territory — Status of Turkish Federated State of Cyprus

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Territorial limits of jurisdiction — European Convention on Human Rights — Duty of each contracting State to secure rights and freedoms to persons 'within its jurisdiction' — Whether extending to persons in territory occupied by one contracting State but within territory of another contracting State

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights — Alleged violations of human rights by Turkish forces occupying part of Cyprus — Whether engaging international responsibility of Turkey — Acts of Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Whether attributable to Turkey

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility For taking of, or interference with, property — Alleged seizure of property belonging to Greek Cypriots in parts of Cyprus occupied by Turkish forces — Whether engaging international responsibility of Turkey — Whether attributable to Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Whether violating European Convention on Human Rights

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts and omissions of State organs and officials — Exhaustion of legal remedies — European Convention on Human Rights — Requirement that domestic remedies be exhausted — Effectiveness of domestic remedies — Alleged violations of human rights by Turkish forces in Turkish occupied Cyprus — Whether alleged victims required to exhaust remedies in Turkey — Remedies provided by Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Many alleged victims refugees forbidden to enter Turkish occupied area — Whether effective domestic remedies open to them — Whether allegedvictim required to seek redress in local courts when challenging legislation or administrative practice

State responsibility — Claims — In general — Claim that State has violated European Convention on Human Rights — Whether claim can be brought by government not recognized by respondent State

The individual in international law — In general — Position of the individual in international law — Human rights and freedoms European Convention on Human Rights — Nature of obligations under Convention — Whether owed by one contracting State to other contracting States or to individuals — Whether claim for alleged violation maybe brought bygovernmentunrecognized by respondent State — Scope of Convention — Whether applicable to acts of State's armed forces on territory of another State — Domestic remedies rule — Scope and application — Limitation period for bringing of claims — Machinery for enforcement of European Convention

Treaties — In general — Conception and function of treaties — European Convention on Human Rights — Whether conferring rights upon other contracting States or individuals — Enforcement — Collective nature of enforcement

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — Operation and enforcement — Machinery for enforcement of European Convention on Human Rights — Collective enforcement — Relationship between applicant and respondent governments — Whether a bar to admissibility of application that applicant government not recognized by respondent government

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — Effect on third parties — European Convention on Human Rights — Effect on individuals

Treaties — Interpretation — Agencies of interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights — Interpretation by European Com — mission of Human Rights — Purpose of Convention

Disputes — Other international courts — European Commission of Human Rights — Nature of proceedings before Commission — Whether adversarial claim or system of collective enforcement — Whether bar to admissibility of application that applicant government not recognized by respondent government

States as international persons — Recognition of Governments — Significance on international plane — Whether government may bring an international claim against State which does not recognize it — Proceedings before European Commission of Human Rights — Whether adversarial proceedings or system of collective enforcement — Significance of non — recognition by respondent State Factual test of existence of government — Government of Cyprus unrecognized by Turkey — Significance of recognition by Turkey of Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Status in international law

Treaties — European Convention on Human Rights — Interpretation — Scope — Whether applicable to alleged acts by Turkish forces in parts of Cyprus occupied by Turkey — Whether within Turkish jurisdiction

The individual in international law — Whether European Convention on Human Rights confers rights upon other contracting States or upon individuals — Individual as a subject of international law

State responsibility — Domestic remedies rule — Scope of domestic remedies rule under European Convention on Human Rights Effectiveness of remedies — Whether alleged victims of actions of Turkish forces in Cyprus expected to exhaust remedies in Turkey — Effectiveness of remedies in courts of Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Refugees forbidden to return to Turkish occupied areas — Whether able to exhaust remedies in those areas — Application of domestic remedies rule in case where alleged violation of human rights results from implementation of legislation or administrative practice — Whether actions of Turkish forces in Cyprus engaging international responsibility of Turkey — Turkish Federated State of Cyprus — Whether actions of Turkish Federated State imputable to Turkey — Whether existence of Turkish Federated State relieving Turkey of liability

European Convention on Human Rights — Nature of Convention — Whether creating mutual obligations between contracting States or obligations towards individuals — Scope of Convention — Whether applicable to alleged violations of human rights by Turkish forces in Cyprus — Extent of obligation of State to guarantee rights and freedoms to persons ‘within its jurisdiction’ — Procedure — Six month limitation period — Application in cases where no domestic remedies exist — Continuing violation of human rights

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)